Papers for

earthquake early warning teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Multi-station AI improves earthquake detection and location accuracy

Event-Centric Earthquake Monitoring with a Multi-Station Transformer

Abstract: Earthquake catalogs underpin studies such as fault structure, earthquake processes and seismic hazard, and their value depends on being both complete and reliable. Machine learning has improved individual tasks of earthquake monitoring, but processing stations independently discards the consistency of arrivals across the network, and running tasks in sequence fragments the information describing each earthquake. We present EQNet2, a geometry-aware multi-station Transformer that jointly predicts phase arrivals, first-motion polarities, source location and magnitude, and the association of arrivals into events. On a Northern California test dataset and on continuous waveforms from Ridgecrest and the San Francisco Bay Area, EQNet2 recovers more weak arrivals, produces fewer false detections, and associates more picks into located events. Its learned attention links information across stations along time--distance patterns consistent with seismic moveout. As seismic networks grow denser, exploiting multi-station coherence and event-centric prediction offers a path to more complete and reliable catalogs.

Mon 12 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Earthquake monitoring relies on detecting tiny signals from many sensors spread across an area. Traditional methods look at each sensor separately, missing patterns that appear only when comparing sensors together. The authors developed an AI model called EQNet2 that looks at data from multiple sensors at once to better detect and link earthquake signals. This model finds weaker signals, makes fewer mistakes, and more accurately groups signals from the same earthquake. It uses patterns in how seismic waves move through the earth to connect information across sensors.
Open → 2610.17404v1

Seismic site response predictions improve using scarce sensor data

Seismic Site Response Prediction from Sparse Observations Using Finite-Element-Pretrained Latent Dynamics

Abstract: Numerical site-response predictions often deviate from observations, yet correcting these discrepancies is difficult because records are limited in both sensor coverage and number of events. This study proposes the Transfer-Enabled Forced Latent Autoencoder for Response Equations (FLARE-T) to improve these predictions by learning and calibrating low-dimensional latent dynamics that connect the base acceleration input to acceleration outputs at multiple depths. FLARE-T learns a low-dimensional response manifold and input-driven dynamics from dense finite-element simulations. It then trains a sparse encoder to map simulated sensor responses into the learned coordinates and uses limited records to calibrate the dynamics within them. A short response window initializes each prediction, while the complete base motion drives the response. The framework was evaluated using a layered-soil centrifuge test and the Lotung field vertical array. Test-set results show that FLARE-T improved multi-depth acceleration histories and 5%-damped pseudoacceleration response spectra relative to the original finite-element models, reducing errors at every evaluated sensor for motions of different intensities and, at Lotung, for both horizontal components. Two Lotung source models with different constitutive parameters achieved comparable test-set accuracy, indicating reduced dependence on precise prior calibration. FLARE-T therefore provides a data-efficient means of combining dense numerical response information with limited field records to improve future site-response predictions.

Thu 17 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Predicting how the ground shakes during earthquakes is hard because there are few sensors and records to learn from. The authors developed a method called FLARE-T that uses detailed computer simulations combined with limited real measurements to better predict shaking at different depths underground. Their approach reduces errors compared to traditional models, even with limited data, and works for different shaking intensities and directions. This makes earthquake response forecasts more accurate and less dependent on perfectly calibrated starting models.
Open → 2609.20451v1