Papers for

e-commerce recommendation teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Personalized recommendation method improves user engagement and diversity

SPAR: Stepwise Personalized Autoregressive Recommendation with Prefix-Balanced Semantic IDs

Abstract: Semantic ID (SID)-based generative recommendation retrieves items through successive token-level decisions, making personalization at each decoding step essential. However, existing methods insufficiently account for prefix-dependent user evidence and imbalanced historical interaction loads among candidate branches. This can cause irreversible branch-selection errors and favor popular paths. We propose SPAR, a generative recommendation framework that jointly improves stepwise personalization and SID construction. Its PATH Decoder retrieves prefix-relevant evidence from compressed long-term user memories and combines it with recent behavior, user profiles, and event context to guide each token decision. Its RQ-PIB module balances historical interaction loads among sibling branches under each parent prefix while preserving semantic structure. Experiments on large-scale Youku production data show an average relative HitRate improvement of 2.66% over the strongest baseline. SPAR also increases target-prefix retention by 5.79 percentage points and reduces the traffic-weighted largest child-branch share by 32.84% across SID levels. In a 7-day online A/B test, SPAR serves 10% of Youku's production traffic and improves average watch time per user by 3.95% and play conversion rate by 3.38%. These results demonstrate more reliable hierarchical decoding, balanced SID branches, and improved user engagement in industrial recommendation.

Tue 20 OctInformation Retrieval
The gist
Recommender systems suggest items like videos or products based on what a user likes, but they can make mistakes if early guesses go wrong or if popular items get too much focus. The authors propose SPAR, a new approach that improves step-by-step decision making by looking at past user behavior and balancing the choices more fairly. This method was tested on a large video platform and showed better accuracy, more balanced suggestions, and higher user watch time compared to existing systems.
Open → 2610.27898v1

Generative recommenders improve ranking by separating training supervision

Training with Missed Targets in Generative Recommendation: Separating Supervision from Probability Competition

Abstract: Generative recommenders return a limited candidate set and may omit observed targets before reranking. A training strategy appends these missed targets to reranker training lists, although inference still ranks only original candidates. This operation simultaneously changes retrieved-target weight, adds supervision over appended targets, and makes the two groups compete for probability. An append/no-append comparison therefore cannot explain changes in returned-item rankings. We construct three matched losses that hold retrieved-target weight fixed while introducing appended-target supervision and group competition separately. The intermediate loss trains within both groups but normalizes them separately, preventing training-only targets from competing with inference candidates. Experiments with a released OneRec model and locally trained Amazon generators show that this competition can harm returned-item ranking. In four prespecified Amazon Video Games comparisons, removing it improved full-target normalized discounted cumulative gain (FT-NDCG) by 7.8--22.2\%; 95\% intervals over users and three of four intervals over training runs excluded zero. A conservative development-set rule selected appended-target training for two of three generators in one held-out category and rejected it for all three in another, avoiding a 1.7\% loss. Candidate completion should therefore be evaluated for each generator rather than applied automatically.

Wed 7 OctInformation RetrievalMachine Learning
The gist
Generative recommendation systems try to suggest items to users but sometimes miss items they should have recommended. The authors study how adding these missed items during training affects the final ranked suggestions. They find that making missed items compete with original candidates for ranking can actually harm performance. By separating supervision on missed items during training from the ranking competition during inference, recommendation quality improves. This means recommendation systems should carefully choose how they train on missed items rather than always using the same approach.
Open → 2610.10124v1

Generative ad retrieval improves Douyin’s recommendation accuracy

Generative End-to-end Ad Retrieval at Douyin

Abstract: Generative retrieval reformulates recommendation as the generation of discrete item tokens. However, scaling this paradigm to real-world recommender systems reveals two critical bottlenecks: 1) Representation collapse, where the item tokenizer converges to degenerate results under continuous distribution shifts, fundamentally hindering stable end-to-end adaptation. 2) Item collisions, where the massive candidate pool causes distinct items to share identical token sequences, compromising the final retrieval precision. Crucially, these bottlenecks are inherently coupled: expanding codebook capacity to mitigate collisions inevitably exacerbates collapse. To address them simultaneously, we propose GEAR, an end-to-end framework that jointly optimizes the tokenizer, generator, and reranker. To mitigate representation collapse, we introduce BasisVQ, which re-parameterizes the codebook via an orthogonal basis to enable global gradient sharing and rigid spatial rotation of the latent space, effectively stabilizing gradient dynamics without ad-hoc heuristics. We further extend it to prefix-aware BasisRQ, substantially enhancing the codebook's expressiveness with the same asymptotic time complexity. To resolve item collisions, GEAR integrates a context-conditioned reranking head into the generative process, efficiently disambiguating colliding items with minimal computational overhead. By unifying stable tokenization and joint reranking within an end-to-end generative framework, GEAR establishes a fully differentiable and scalable paradigm. It currently serves hundreds of millions of daily active users on Douyin Ads, yielding substantial empirical improvements in extensive online A/B tests.

Wed 30 SeptInformation Retrieval
The gist
Recommending ads on big platforms can be tricky because similar items can get mixed up and models can become unstable over time. The authors propose a method called GEAR that fixes these problems by making the system’s internal code more stable and by checking hard-to-distinguish items closely. This system works together smoothly and helps Douyin show better ads to hundreds of millions of users every day.
Open → 2609.39327v1

Selective routing improves novelty in personalized recommendations

Routing Between Generative and Collaborative User Profiles: A Serving-Time Gate for Controllable Novelty

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) enable rich semantic user profiles for recommendation, but such profiles are more expensive to generate and are not necessarily desirable to deploy uniformly. We study whether LLM-generated profiles can instead be invoked selectively within a production recommendation pipeline. Using a real-world streaming dataset covering movies, TV shows, and sports content, we train a serving-time routing gate that assigns each user to either a collaborative sequential recommendation model or a recommendation model driven by an LLM-generated profile. The gate uses only serving-time features and learns to identify users for whom profile-based routing can increase Novelty@10 while preserving ranking relevance. A routing threshold controls how aggressively users are sent to the generative model, exposing a tunable novelty--relevance trade-off. At an overall NDCG-loss budget of 5\%, the learned gate increases Novelty@10 by 6.5\% while routing 12.5\% of users, outperforming simple heuristic and random routing policies at comparable relevance cost. These results show that LLM-generated user profiles can serve as a controllable complement to collaborative recommendation, while results with non-generative semantic profiles indicate that the benefit stems from selective routing rather than LLM generation alone.

Wed 30 SeptInformation Retrieval
The gist
Making recommendations more interesting without losing accuracy is tricky. The authors studied how to use smart user profiles made by large language models (LLMs) only when it really helps. They built a system that decides in real time if a user should see recommendations based on an LLM profile or a usual collaborative method. This system boosts the chance of showing new content without making recommendations worse overall.
Open → 2609.39043v1