Papers for
drone operators
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Global path planner adapts robot movement for different terrains
Global Path Planner with Multi-Model Switching
Abstract: This work enhances global path planning via a pure-pursuit controller with multi-model kinematic switching that sustains plan fidelity across diverse terrains. The system includes a traversability graph for terrain analysis, a Heading-Aware A* algorithm for generating feasible paths, and a multi-model Pure Pursuit controller for dynamic tracking. A core innovation is adaptive kinematic modeling, enabling real-time switching between kinematic models based on terrain features and robot states. This adaptability optimizes path efficiency and energy use in challenging scenarios. We validate the approach in simulation on different platforms, namely the Artaban quadruped and the X3 quadrotor drone, showcasing improved performance, robustness, and adaptability over standard baselines.
Geometry helps drones handoff tracked targets accurately in flight
PATH: Continuous Target Sensing among Autonomous Cooperative Drones
Abstract: Continuous target sensing by uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) is constrained by limited flight endurance, motivating the transfer of tracking responsibility between cooperating UAVs. Such a handoff requires the receiver to identify the same physical target currently tracked by the sender despite differences in viewpoint, scale, and target appearance. Existing approaches based on global target localization or appearance-based cross-view association are limited by positioning uncertainty or ambiguous visual features. This paper presents Perspective Alignment \& Tracking Handoff (\textbf{PATH}), a platform-agnostic, geometry-assisted sensing and verification framework for target handoff between two moving UAVs. The sender reconstructs the tracked target as a metric 3D point using RGB-D sensing, while the receiver estimates its relative pose from a fiducial observation and projects the transmitted target point into its own image as a spatial prior for target acquisition. The receiver-generated candidate is then returned to the sender and verified through a cross-view Mutual Agreement Handshake before tracking responsibility is transferred. Real-world UAV experiments show mean relative-position and target-position errors of 0.047~m and 0.030~m, respectively. Under visually ambiguous conditions, PATH achieves 96.0\% frame-level receiver-side target acquisition accuracy, with 2.0\% false-positive and 2.0\% false-negative rates. A sensor-error sensitivity analysis shows that relative-pose uncertainty is the dominant contributor to receiver-view projection error. The implementation operates at video rate with compact inter-UAV communication below 16~kB/s at 60~Hz, demonstrating the feasibility of lightweight geometry-assisted target handoff on resource-constrained UAV platforms.
Multirotors plan routes to save battery under localized disturbances
Battery-Aware Predictive Trajectory Planning and Control for Multirotors Under Disturbances
Abstract: This paper presents a battery-aware predictive trajectory-planning and control framework for multirotors operating under spatially localized disturbances. Candidate trajectories are evaluated through closed-loop vehicle--motor--battery propagation, allowing disturbance-induced control demand, electrical energy, battery evolution, and terminal-voltage-dependent actuator capability to enter the planning process. % A reduced-order battery model is numerically benchmarked against an independently implemented Simscape equivalent-circuit reference, with a power NRMSE of $0.64\%$ and a cumulative-energy discrepancy below $0.7\%$. % In a $150$-s, $640$-m mission containing three disturbance regions, the selected trajectory reduces electrical energy consumption by $7.46\%$ and position-tracking RMSE by approximately $72\%$ relative to the disturbance-aware fixed-reference baseline. % Planner ablations show that battery-dependent terms are nonbinding at nominal SOC but alter the selected trajectory under a depleted-battery stress condition. % Execution with multiple feedback controllers further demonstrates that controller selection changes the tradeoff among tracking accuracy, energy consumption, and actuator utilization. % The results demonstrate the benefit of accounting for predicted closed-loop energetic and battery--actuator consequences during trajectory selection.
UAVs follow targets safely using future-aware path planning
Future-Aware Flow Planning for Safe UAV Target Following
Abstract: UAV target following in cluttered environments is inherently predictive: current-state followers can lag behind turns, choose blocked corridors, or trade tracking for unsafe near-horizon motion. We propose a future-aware flow planning framework for state-informed UAV target following. Predicted target futures guide clean UAV trajectory generation as horizon-aligned residual signals, while risk-scored executable-prefix repair is embedded inside the sampling loop. On fixed ID/OOD receding-horizon benchmarks, the planner improves the intended safety--tracking trade-off rather than dominating every metric: it matches zero measured ID collision rate with the highest ID safe-tracking time, and gives the lowest OOD macro collision rate and final tracking error among the displayed methods, while Future-MPC remains smoother and stronger on some thresholded OOD success metrics under its hand-designed objective. Ablations show that future adaptation improves candidate generation before safety repair, and simulator-facing stress tests probe interface, sensing, and controller-execution effects. These results support horizon-aligned future adaptation and embedded prefix repair as complementary ingredients for safe UAV target following under the tested simulation conditions.
Cognitive radar hides decision patterns against adversaries effectively
Masking Radar Cognition under Adversarial Surveillance: A Distributional Privacy Framework
Abstract: In this article, we propose an online electronic counter-countermeasure (ECCM) framework designed to conceal the strategic decision-making processes of a cognitive radar (CR) operating under adversarial surveillance. We model the CR under two distinct decision paradigms: a static constrained utility-maximizing behavior and a dynamic expected utility-maximizing behavior. The radar's utility function is modeled via a von Mises--Fisher (vMF) distribution, with the distributional parameter constituting the private information to be protected from adversarial inference. We adopt a distribution privacy framework to conceal this private information and provide formal distribution privacy guarantees for cognition masking. In this work, we develop cognition-hiding algorithms for both static constrained utility maximization (WDPCH-SU), and dynamic expected utility maximization (WDPCH-DU). Through rigorous mathematical analysis, we show that both WDPCH-SU and WDPCH-DU satisfy $ε$-distribution privacy ($ε$-DistP) against inference-based adversarial attacks and present the privacy--performance trade-off bounds, quantifying utility loss (in static setting) and expected utility deviation (in dynamic setting) as functions of $ε$. Numerical results show that WDPCH-SU gives about 15\% improvement in utility loss at maximum privacy compared to the existing methodology while WDPCH-DU achieves a greater reduction in adversarial Fisher information without requiring explicit Fisher information constraints, at a moderate, analytically bounded utility deviation. These results are highly promising in many 6G communication scenarios such as network slicing for automated driving and swarm UAV coordination, where it is essential to keep the resource allocation policy robust against privacy attacks.