Papers for

drone navigation engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

LiDAR odometry tuning improves drone flight navigation accuracy

Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Aerial LiDAR-Inertial Odometries in low-altitude flights

Abstract: LiDAR-based SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) and LIO (LiDAR-inertial odometry) algorithms are often used for precise navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles, especially during interactions with the aerial robot's environment. However, the performance of these algorithms is greatly dependent on the scenario, LiDAR, and robot motion characteristics, often requiring an intensive tuning process to achieve the desired performance. To aid these tuning efforts, this paper analyzes the influence on performance of the parameters of an EKF-based LIO algorithm (FAST-LIO2) and the LIO module of a graph-based SLAM algorithm (Cartographer) on aerial LiDAR SLAM datasets recorded using different LiDARs in low-to-moderate-altitude flights in diverse environments. The analysis is conducted on the absolute trajectory error (ATE) resulting from processing the datasets with the LIO algorithms configured with each combination of parameters obtained in an exhaustive grid search. The relationship between individual parameters and the ATE results is assessed using Pearson's correlation, while the influence of each parameter is assessed using random forest permutation importance analyses with random forest models trained to predict the resulting ATE values based on the choice of parameters. The performed analysis obtains for Cartographer and FAST-LIO2: i) the identification of parameters with stronger influence in performance, ii) a simplified tuning procedure, and iii) tuning recommendations. Using the proposed tuning recommendations, both algorithms obtain on the analyzed datasets ATE values within 5 cm to the optimal performance found in the grid search procedure in 94% of the analyzed cases.

Fri 11 SeptRobotics
The gist
Drones use special sensors like LiDAR and inertial devices to figure out where they are while flying. Getting these sensors to work just right can be tricky because there are many settings to adjust, and it depends on things like the drone’s movement and environment. The paper looks at how changing these settings affects how accurately drones can track their position. The authors studied two popular drone mapping methods and gave clear advice on how to tune their settings to get good accuracy without much trial and error.
Open 2609.12837v1

Trajectory planning method optimizes drone flight paths without needing models

Trajectory Bundle Method in SE(3) for Black-Box Fixed-Wing Aircraft Trajectory Optimization

Abstract: Dynamically feasible trajectory optimization for rigid-body systems is naturally formulated on the special Euclidean group SE(3) but is challenging when dynamics are available only as black-box computations without derivatives. This paper formulates the Trajectory Bundle Method (TBM) for motion planning implicitly on SE(3). Bundles are constructed in the Lie algebra and propagated through nonlinear rigid-body dynamics using exponential and logarithmic maps, enabling derivative-free planning of non-Euclidean trajectories. We show that Euclidean TBM interpolation error is bounded quadratically by bundle diameter and extend this result to SE(3), where the bound additionally depends on a local Lipschitz constant of the Log map. Numerical experiments corroborate these bounds. Finally, we demonstrate SE(3) TBM by optimizing an acrobatic, collision-free fixed-wing maneuver through a rotated aperture without explicit models or derivatives of the vehicle dynamics, aerodynamics, or collision model.

Thu 10 SeptRobotics
The gist
Planning safe and doable flight paths for flying robots is hard when you don't know exactly how they move. The authors created a way to plan paths that respect 3D rotations and positions, using special math tools that don't need detailed models or derivatives. They tested this method on a drone flying through a tricky space and found it could plan smooth, collision-free maneuvers. This approach helps plan complex moves even when the robot’s dynamics are unknown or hard to model.
Open 2609.12248v1

AirAnchor improves drone navigation by combining local and global spatial data

AirAnchor: Bridging Local and Global Spatial Information for Zero-Shot Aerial Vision-and-Language Navigation

Abstract: Aerial Vision-and-Language Navigation requires drones to follow natural-language instructions and navigate through complex urban environments. Accurate navigation relies on both local and global spatial information, which support immediate action grounding and long-horizon path planning, respectively. However, existing zero-shot methods typically operate at a single spatial scale, relying either on local representations constructed online from current observations or on global memories built offline from historical experience. To address this limitation, we propose AirAnchor, a new paradigm that bridges local and global spatial information through spatial anchors and integrates both into a shared navigation framework, enabling comprehensive spatial grounding for decision-making. AirAnchor consists of three core components: (1) Query-Driven Spatial Anchor Grounding, which identifies decision-relevant anchors from visual observations and organizes them into local spatial representations; (2) Persistent Object Spatial Memory, which incrementally maintains an object knowledge base as persistent global spatial memory and retrieves landmark-related spatial priors; and (3) a Spatially-Informed Navigation Agent, which explicitly integrates both local and global spatial information into an agentic framework for decision-making. Extensive experiments on AerialVLN demonstrate that AirAnchor substantially outperforms existing zero-shot baselines, validating the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed paradigm.

Tue 8 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceRobotics
The gist
Drones need to understand both nearby surroundings and big-picture maps to follow spoken directions in cities accurately. The researchers created AirAnchor, a new system that connects close-up visuals and long-term landmarks, helping drones navigate better without training on new tasks. It uses three parts: one picks out important local spots, another remembers key objects over time, and the last uses both to make smart navigation choices. Tests show AirAnchor works better than previous methods that only focus on one type of information.
Open 2609.08442v1

Aerial drone navigation improves finding outdoor targets with dual belief maps

Dual-Layer Semantic-Spatial Belief Mapping for Aerial Object Goal Navigation

Abstract: Aerial Object Goal Navigation (ObjectNav) requires an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to locate a described target in an unknown outdoor environment using onboard visual observations. Vision-language models (VLMs) can interpret open-ended target descriptions and visual observations, but their frame-level outputs are often noisy, sparse, and spatially transient. We propose AeroBelief, a dual-layer semantic-spatial belief mapping framework that transforms transient VLM observations into persistent spatial guidance. It separates broad contextual plausibility from target-specific evidence: an intuition layer accumulates scene-level semantic cues for exploration, while an evidence layer preserves qualified target-specific observations for approach and confirmation. Evidence-gated fusion combines the two layers into spatial belief hotspots. We further introduce object-conditioned visual reasoning with conservative evidence qualification to improve observation reliability before spatial accumulation. In parallel, egocentric regional guidance converts quadtree coverage into UAV-centered, yaw-aligned directional proposals and stabilizes them through temporal commitment. Its regional scoring is independent of semantic belief values, maintaining exploration pressure and reducing repeated low-gain search. Experiments on the UAV-ON benchmark show that AeroBelief achieves the best reported overall SR, OSR, and SPL among the compared methods, reaching 21.61%, 35.57%, and 10.62, respectively. These results support the effectiveness of persistent semantic-spatial belief, conservative evidence qualification, and temporally stable regional guidance for aerial ObjectNav.

Tue 8 SeptRoboticsArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Finding specific objects outdoors with drones is hard because their camera views can be unclear or change quickly. The authors created a system called AeroBelief that helps drones remember where they might find the target by building two layers of information: one that guesses where things could be, and another that confirms actual sightings. This lets the drone explore intelligently and focus on the right areas without getting confused by brief or noisy observations. Their method performed best on a test that measures how well drones find outdoor objects.
Open 2609.08164v1