Papers for
document summarization teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Propalign estimates proposition importance from multiple summaries
The Sum of All Summaries: PROPALIGN for Graded Proposition Salience Evaluation
Abstract: Identification and ranking of salient propositions in documents is indirectly involved in many AI tasks, but few papers define proposition salience scores clearly, make diverse data available, or evaluate models directly on the task. This paper proposes PROPALIGN, a multiple-summary-based approach for propositional salience score estimation, and releases PROPALIGNBANK, an accompanying dataset for the method with 138K alignments of over 35K propositions. We compare several approaches to salient proposition extraction in English across a broad range of spoken and written genres, and demonstrate that naively asking models for judgments leads to inconsistencies. By contrast, graded, summary-based metrics are more stable. We further observe that while single models perform worse than humans, an ensemble of models incorporating linguistic features approaches manual annotation quality ceilings. In addition, analyses of the model outputs suggest insights into how models can extract salient information with and without the use of summaries.
MORSE method improves evidence retention by reordering contexts
MORSE: Multi-Context Ordering via Reverse Scoring for Evidence-Preserving Compression
Abstract: Likelihood-based context compression can account for cross-context redundancy through sequential scoring, but this makes compression outcomes sensitive to context order. We show that different permutations of the same context collection can produce markedly different evidence-retention outcomes under an unchanged compressor. We attribute this sensitivity to information preemption: earlier partially relevant contexts can absorb credit for shared information, suppressing the incremental score of later, stronger evidence carriers and increasing their risk of removal. Controlled pair-swap interventions directly support this mechanism by showing that evidence-first ordering substantially improves supporting-evidence survival. To address this problem, we introduce MORSE, a compression-aware method for evidence-preserving context ordering. MORSE applies a common reverse query-evidence principle to both individual contexts and compressed candidate outputs, using the former to construct an evidence-first anchor and the latter to guide compression-aware permutation selection. Across multi-hop QA benchmarks, compression procedures, budgets, and scoring models, MORSE consistently improves evidence preservation over static reverse ordering and compute-matched random search, with corresponding overall improvements in downstream QA. Our code is available at https://github.com/tbn5pj/MORSE_code.