document digitization teams

Abstract: Text-centric Visual Question Answering (VQA) requires reading and reasoning over text embedded in images, a task made substantially harder when images suffer from real-world degradation such as motion blur, low resolution, or compression artifacts. While modular OCR-based pipelines and end-to-end vision-language models are both widely used for this task, their comparative robustness under degraded conditions remains underexplored. We present an empirical study comparing two modular pipelines with SA-DBNet, a custom detector architecture combining ResNet-18 with self-attention spatial modeling and deformable convolutions against an end-to-end vision-language baseline, evaluated on 4013 degraded images with 7000 question-answer pairs. Fine-tuned modular pipelines achieve up to 57.50% exact-match accuracy versus 38.00% for the end-to-end baseline, with domain-specific fine-tuning yielding a gain of up to 29.50 percentage points. Critically, we find that conventional OCR error metrics like Character Error Rate and Word Error Rate are unreliable predictors of downstream VQA performance, as semantic reasoning can compensate for recognition failures when contextual cues are present. These findings highlight the importance of task-aware evaluation for text-centric VQA systems under realistic visual conditions. Codes are available here

Abstract: Handwritten mathematical expression recognition (HMER) is conventionally scored by exact-match rates and string-similarity metrics that are blind to where an error occurs: two predictions with identical token-error counts receive identical scores whether they misplace a subscript or swap the operands of a fraction. Render-based character detection matching (CDM) aligns glyphs robustly but remains position-blind---on controlled fraction-operand swaps it scores 0.8595 where position-aware scoring yields 0.6253. Tree-edit metrics exhibit a complementary blind spot: rewrites outside the parser's normalization coverage are penalized as structural errors (0.8552 where render-based metrics score 1.0). We propose PA-CDM, a position-aware metric that couples character detection matching with position-forest encoding and divergence-level weighting; StructPerturb v2.0, a frozen benchmark of 1,340 controlled perturbation pairs across 15 type--intensity cells; and a cross-metric consistency protocol combining a sensitivity matrix, a human study, and LLM-judge calibration. In a six-annotator study, PA-CDM attains the highest correlation with human judgments among seven automatic metrics (Spearman rho=0.9535, n=990). A frontier LLM judge correlates slightly higher (rho=0.9613) but is costly, nondeterministic, and API-dependent; PA-CDM approaches it at zero marginal cost with deterministic, diagnosable behavior.

Abstract: Handwritten text recognition resources are often small and distributed across collections that differ in language, script, document structure, and annotation format, making joint page-level training difficult. We propose ExpertHTR, a unified vision-language framework that addresses this problem through complementary supervision and conditional model capacity. Structural annotations from heterogeneous datasets are first organized through a common Page-Region-Line representation and used to construct four related training tasks for complete transcription, physical-line coverage, text localization, and localized recognition, without requiring additional manual labels. Building on a jointly trained dense model, ExpertHTR introduces a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with an always-active shared branch and conditionally routed full-MLP experts. Sparsegen allows the number of active routed experts to vary with the hidden representation, while routing regularization reduces persistent concentration on a small subset of experts. Experiments on seven heterogeneous handwriting benchmarks show that complementary supervision consistently improves training with page transcription alone, while joint multi-source training provides further gains on most datasets. The proposed sparse expert model further improves the dense baseline on six of the seven sources. The final unified model also substantially outperforms the evaluated general-purpose OCR and vision-language systems on most benchmarks and achieves state-of-the-art performance on the IAM paragraph-level benchmark, while specialized HTR systems remain stronger on several challenging collections.