Papers for
document automation teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Vision language model improves multi-step data extraction from complex documents
DocMIDE: Learning Multi-Hop Implicit Derivation in Visually Rich Documents
Abstract: Real-world document processing systems rely on rigid, predefined schemas, yet critical target fields often lack direct visual counterparts on the page. Extracting these implicit values requires multi-hop derivation, such as aggregating sub-categories or reasoning over visual marks. While existing methods handle explicit text spans or simple implicit queries, they fail at multi-hop visual reasoning even after standard fine-tuning: models retrieve incorrect visual evidence, or retrieve it correctly and then skip the intermediate steps of the derivation. To address this, we introduce DocMIDE, a fine-tuning framework that trains compact vision-language models to retrieve visual evidence explicitly before deriving an answer. DocMIDE constrains generation to a plan-retrieve-derive structure and optimizes it with Group Relative Policy Optimization under a four-component, rule-based reward that scores output format, the retrieved evidence block, every intermediate derivation step, and the final value against a verified reference trace. On a 4,151-pair implicit extraction benchmark, DocMIDE raises accuracy from 70.8% to 95.9% on Qwen3.5-4B from only a small set of annotated examples, and transfers to a second backbone architecture. Supervised demonstrations alone do not close this gap at any budget we tested; rewarding the intermediate steps is what does.
High quality form field detection data improves document understanding
Mind the Gaps: A Curated Benchmark for Form Field Detection
Abstract: Form Field Detection (FFD) is a fundamental component of document understanding systems, enabling applications ranging from large-scale industrial digitization to accessible form interaction for automated analysis. Unlike conventional object detection tasks, FFD is inherently challenging because fields are often defined by layout structure and whitespace rather than visible foreground content. Existing large-scale datasets frequently rely on heuristic annotation pipelines, resulting in noisy and inconsistent labels that hinder reliable evaluation. In this work, we introduce mini-CommonForms, a carefully curated FFD benchmark with consistent, high-quality annotations, and present a detailed evaluation of state-of-the-art detection approaches. The benchmark is designed to support reproducible research in document automation and accessibility-oriented applications. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/moured/mini-commonforms
Improving confidence scores for reliable automatic processing of financial documents
Perception, Layout, and Validation: Calibrated Confidence for Reliable Straight-Through Processing of Financial Documents
Abstract: Straight-through processing (STP) on extracted key-value fields from financial documents without human review requires a calibrated probability together with a bounded guarantee on the residual error of the auto-approved tier. The emergence of modern Vision Language Models (VLMs) provides an out-of-the-box capability for extracting the key-values, but their verbalized confidence signals are unreliable and weakly track field correctness. This paper introduces a decomposed confidence layer along three interpretable channels, including perception, layout, and validation. Together with a final conformal risk control, the score can be used for reliable STP of financial documents. The method is validated on three public datasets covering real invoices, synthetic invoices, and ad-buy forms, using two different VLM families (Qwen3.6-27B and Gemini-3.1-Flash-Lite). Our decomposed score consistently improves the separation of correct from incorrect extractions, substantially raising the AUROC from 0.54-0.74 for VLM verbalized signals to 0.90-0.99 with contributions from all three designed channels. Crucially for industrial deployment, this enables usable STP. The native VLM confidence signals could clear only 0.1%-7.0% of fields under risk control at a target error of <10%. In contrast, the proposed method auto-approves 49-72% of fields while holding the empirical error of the accepted tier at or below the target.
Benchmarking scientific figures as editable powerpoint slides
ReFigBench: Benchmarking Scientific Figure Reconstruction as Editable PowerPoint Artifacts
Abstract: Multimodal coding agents are expected to turn visual inputs into usable artifacts, and they act through a harness, the layer of tools, context management, and execution environment around the model. Existing evaluations often isolate short tool calls, API traces, or screenshot resemblance, and a low score under these proxies cannot say whether the model saw poorly, planned poorly, or was failed by its harness. We study scientific overview figure reconstruction, an agent task in which a source image must become an editable PowerPoint slide that preserves text, topology, layout, and native document structure. We introduce ReFigBench, a benchmark and evaluation framework built on 1,000 real overview figures retrieved from arXiv papers with full provenance. Coding agents from four model families reconstruct every figure under two workflows, direct code generation and a specialized PPTX workflow, and the strongest model runs inside two commercial harnesses, yielding ten configurations. Evaluation combines deterministic artifact checks, repeated automated scoring by judges from two model families, and blinded human comparisons. Perception remains a bottleneck that iterative rendering only partly repays. Whether workflow effort converts into quality depends on the model together with its harness, since the same model gains from the specialized workflow inside one harness and loses inside the other, and the harness shifts scores even under an identical direct prompt. The specialized workflow erases native connectors in every configuration, human judges still prefer its renderings in most matchups, and even the strongest agent falls short of the rubric ceiling. These results expose the tension between fidelity and editability as the central challenge for practical multimodal document agents.