digitization teams

Abstract: Historical document analysis is crucial for cultural heritage preservation and low-resource language digitization. However, real historical documents often suffer from severe degradation, such as ink erosion and structural damage, causing mixed-visibility character sequences. Conventional OCR systems struggle in such evidence-limited scenarios, while contextual language models may over-correct visually clear characters. To address these challenges, we propose DDVR-Net, a degradation-aware decoupling and visibility-guided restoration framework for historical document recognition. DDVR-Net decouples intrinsic glyph structures from physical corruption at the feature level and predicts local visibility to estimate character reliability. A contextual decoder is selectively activated through a visibility-guided gate, restoring degraded characters while preserving clear visual recognition. Furthermore, we construct a low-resource multilingual benchmark covering Tibetan, Mongolian, and Uyghur scripts with 187000 document pairs, combining large-scale synthetic data and progressive training with real-world annotations to reduce the synthetic-to-real gap. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DDVR-Net consistently outperforms existing methods across three languages and diverse reading orders, providing an effective framework and benchmark for low-resource historical document recognition. Code and Benchmark: https://github.com/Shajiu/DDVR-Net

Abstract: Chinese historical documents are invaluable cultural treasures, but their complexity poses significant comprehension challenges for non-specialists. Despite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) in modern document tasks, their capabilities in Long (full-book) Historical Document understanding remain largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce LongHisDoc, the first benchmark tailored for long historical document understanding. LongHisDoc comprises 1,012 expert-annotated QA pairs derived from 101 PDF documents, with an average of 85.1 pages and 42,776.4 tokens per document. It spans 10 categories and features four QA types: single-page, cross-page, multi-hop, and unanswerable. Answering these questions requires integrating multimodal evidence from text, layout, and visual elements. Our evaluation reveals that the top-performing LVLM and LLM achieve only 62.9% and 69.9% accuracy, respectively, highlighting a substantial performance gap. Furthermore, we assess various modal retrievers and the end-to-end RAG performance to provide references for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. We believe that LongHisDoc serves as a comprehensive benchmark to catalyze future research in full-book historical document understanding. The benchmark and evaluation code are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/qweq12433454/LongHisDoc and https://github.com/SCUT-DLVCLab/LongHisDoc.