Papers for

digital rights managers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

AI detection benchmark reveals music artifact patterns and limits

MUSEBENCH: A Benchmark for AI-Generated Music Detection and Artifact Analysis

Abstract: Advances in generative AI have made it possible to produce music that is nearly indistinguishable from human compositions, raising the question of whether such works can be reliably distinguished from human compositions. We present MUSEBENCH, a large-scale benchmark for AI-generated music detection and artifact analysis, comprising over 361K tracks. The dataset includes human compositions, stylistically matched music generated by ten state-of-the-art open-source and commercial models, such as Suno and Udio, as well as human-AI co-creations and variants processed with adversarial perturbations, compression, and acoustic post-processing. Using MUSEBENCH, we benchmark 11 automated detectors and evaluate their accuracy, generalization, and robustness, under default, out-of-domain, and transformed-variant experiment settings. We further conduct a comprehensive artifact analysis through acoustic feature inspection, identifying recurring signatures such as non-idiomatic harmonic progressions, upsampling induced spectral periodicities, and violations of physical performance constraints. Our findings reveal key strengths and vulnerabilities of existing detectors and provide practical insights for building more reliable AI music detection systems.

Wed 14 OctSound
The gist
It is becoming very hard to tell AI-generated music from human-made music. The authors created MUSEBENCH, a huge collection of music tracks made by humans and AI, to test how well detection tools work. They analyzed 11 detectors using many types of AI music and tricks that change the sounds to see where detectors succeed or fail. They also studied typical AI music glitches, like strange chords and unrealistic sounds. This research helps improve tools for spotting AI-created music in the future.
Open → 2610.20310v1

Tokenization-Invariant watermarking secures text with byte-level scoring

Tokenization-Invariant Watermarking: A Byte-Local Method for LLM Text

Abstract: We introduce Tokenization-Invariant Watermarking (TI-WM), a method that embeds a watermark during token generation but keys and scores it on canonicalized UTF-8 bytes. The detector does not invoke the tokenizer. Canonicalizer-preserving edits leave its score unchanged; other localized canonical-byte edits affect a bounded number of scoring windows. Across three fixed keys and 128 prompts per key and model, a deterministic white-box attack at a 5% word-edit budget leaves mean attacked-AUC 0.530 on Qwen3-8B and 0.664 on Gemma 4 E4B, compared with 0.410 and 0.489 for Unigram with detection-side deletion. These operating points are not jointly matched on quality and clean detectability. Bias sweeps show model-dependent distortion costs, and shared-rule controls support a locality interpretation without establishing a unique advantage of bytes. Visible insertion outside the canonicalizer's deletion set defeats the default design. Alphabetic filtering closes that channel but does not resolve source shift or calibrated detection power. TI-WM thus provides a concrete construction with local scoring guarantees and measured attack-ranking gains, not a general robustness or low-false-positive-rate deployment guarantee.

Fri 9 OctCryptography and SecurityComputation and Language
The gist
Detecting if a text was created by a language model is tricky because different ways of splitting words can change the hidden signals. The authors present a way to hide a secret mark in text by looking directly at the underlying bytes of characters instead of word tokens. This approach makes the mark harder to remove or alter, even if some changes are made to the text. However, it does not guarantee perfect detection or full protection against all attacks.
Open → 2610.14378v1

Data attribution benchmark assesses text to music model training impact

TrueMuse: A Benchmark for Data Attribution in Text-to-Music Models

Abstract: Text-to-music generation models are trained on massive music collections, creating a growing need for data attribution methods that can quantify the contribution of individual training samples. However, existing attribution methods are difficult to rigorously evaluate due to the lack of reliable ground truth, making it challenging to reliably assess their actual effectiveness. To address this gap, we introduce TrueMuse, a controlled dataset and benchmark for text-to-music data attribution. TrueMuse is constructed by fine-tuning three diffusion-based text-to-music models on carefully curated attribution samples, whose known inclusion in fine-tuning provides controlled attribution targets for evaluation. The benchmark covers four attribution settings, spanning melodic structure, timbral characteristics, artist-level stylistic signatures, and genre-level shared patterns, and includes 133 attributes, 648 fine-tuned models, and 95,456 generated samples across two prompt types. Using TrueMuse, we systematically evaluate existing black-box attribution methods along four dimensions: fine-tuning improvement, prompt-type difficulty, multi-task training, and fine-tuning data size. Our results show that attribution remains challenging, with existing methods exhibiting substantial variation across evaluation settings, highlighting the need for more reliable and generalizable attribution methods for text-to-music generation. Code and Dataset will be released upon acceptance.

Wed 30 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Text-to-music models learn from huge music collections, but it’s hard to tell which parts of the training data influence the output. The authors created TrueMuse, a special dataset and test setup to measure how well methods can attribute generated music back to specific training samples. They fine-tuned models on known pieces and tested several attribution techniques in different scenarios, showing that current methods struggle and vary widely in accuracy. This work helps identify the challenges and sets a path for better data attribution in music generation.
Open → 2610.00835v1

Query-limited ram programs enable controlled stateful quantum computations

Query-Limited RAM Programs and their Applications

Abstract: Quantum one-time programs (Broadbent, Gutoski and Stebila, CRYPTO 2013) or OTPs for short, enable a functionality to be encoded into a quantum token that can be evaluated on a single chosen input and then becomes unusable. While powerful, this primitive is inherently stateless and tied to a setting in which a quantum token needs to be issued and distributed for every single evaluation of a circuit. This raises a natural question: can the one-time computation paradigm be extended to richer, stateful forms of controlled access, and would such an extension offer inherent advantages beyond standard OTPs? We introduce $\textit{query-limited RAM programs}$ (QLPs), a RAM-generalization of QOTPs that supports structured, stateful computation under bounded or policy-driven access. QLPs allow controlled sequences of evaluations while preventing adversarial forking or rollback of computational state. This enables new applications beyond stateless one-time programs, including quantum tokens for Turing Machines whose size depends only on $\textit{code length}$ (and not runtime), transferable $k$-time or budget-limited programs, and low-communication mechanisms for delegating computation in settings such as Software-as-a-Service. To construct QLPs, we introduce $\textit{one-shot programs}$, unifying one-shot signatures (Amos, Georgiou, Kiayias and Zhandry, STOC 2020) with the single effective query paradigm (Gupte, Liu, Raizes, Roberts and Vaikuntanathan, STOC 2025). We prove that one-shot programs generically imply query-limited programs, demonstrating that the strengthened unclonability guarantees of one-shot signatures translate into enhanced functionality. Along the way, we clarify the relationship between signature-token primitives and quantum one-time programs via generic constructions, essentially showing that one-time signing programs imply one-time general computation.

Wed 30 SeptCryptography and Security
The gist
Traditional quantum one-time programs let you use a quantum token to run a computation just once, but they can't keep track of state or allow multiple interactions. The authors developed query-limited RAM programs, which extend these ideas to allow multiple controlled uses of a program while protecting its internal state from being copied or reverted by attackers. They build these programs using new tools called one-shot programs, combining cryptographic and quantum concepts to enable more powerful and flexible quantum tokens. This work opens the door to new applications where quantum computations need to be stateful and access-controlled.
Open → 2609.40194v1

Pairwise watermarking improves detection in machine generated text

TTMark: Pairwise Distortion-Free Watermarking Beyond Single-Token Entropy

Abstract: Distortion-free watermarking enables reliable attribution of machine-generated text while preserving output distribution. However, existing methods operate independently on each generated token, making their detection capability fundamentally constrained by the entropy of the next-token distribution. We present Tandem Token WaterMark (TTMARK), a general pairwise watermarking framework that extends distortion-free watermarking from individual tokens to adjacent token pairs. By watermarking the joint distribution of consecutive tokens, TTMARK enlarges the effective watermarking alphabet from V to $V^2$, allowing the detector to exploit both token entropy and conditional entropy while preserving distortion-freeness over the joint distribution. We further introduce a branch-isolating concatenated tandem generation algorithm that efficiently constructs the joint distribution in a single forward pass. Theoretically, we show that pairwise watermarking achieves better expected detection strength in low-entropy regimes. Extensive experiments across multiple language models, datasets, and three representative distortion-free watermarking schemes demonstrate that TTMARK consistently improves detectability without degrading generation quality, while also improving robustness to edits and substantially enhancing localized watermark detection.

Mon 28 SeptCryptography and SecurityComputation and Language
The gist
Watermarks in AI-written text help show who created it without changing the text itself. Existing watermarks check one word at a time, limiting how well they can be found. The authors introduce a method that watermarks pairs of words together, making detection much stronger without altering the text quality. This new approach also works better if the text is edited and can find watermarks in smaller excerpts more reliably.
Open → 2609.36372v1

Frozen audio watermarkers boosted with learned decoders for better message recovery

No Time to Collapse: Unlocking Robustness and Multiplexed Capacity in Frozen Audio Watermarkers

Abstract: Modern neural audio watermarking systems typically embed a message repeatedly across time and then collapse the resulting temporal evidence into a single payload using averaging, voting, or another fixed aggregation rule. We argue that this temporal collapse limits both robustness and the recovery of multiple payloads, and that the limitation can be addressed without retraining the underlying watermarker. We freeze a pretrained watermarker's encoder and detector and train only a low-latency Conformer-based decoder. The decoder consumes the detector's temporal soft outputs, which a system-specific adapter pools into a sequence of window-level representations, and predicts the embedded message. On three frozen watermarkers (AURA, AudioSeal, and WavMark), the learned decoder improves recovery of attacked messages and yields higher detection AUROC point estimates on all three. Under controlled full- and partial-coverage multiplexing, it improves joint-exact recovery of two alternating payload words by 9.7-48.0, 6.9-17.3, and 8.2-14.2 percentage points, respectively, under one to three chained attacks on feasible clips.

Thu 24 SeptSound
The gist
Watermarking audio means hiding secret messages inside sounds so they can be detected later. Usually, these systems repeat messages over time and then combine all the clues into one final message, which can weaken the ability to recover the message accurately. The authors show that by keeping the original watermark system fixed and training a new small part to better interpret all the clues together, they can recover hidden messages more reliably and even get multiple messages back from the same audio. This improves performance on tests with attacks that distort the audio.
Open → 2609.29737v1