Papers for
digital music archivists
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Dual encoder transformer improves piano performance transcription accuracy
DuET: Note-Frame Dual Encoding for Piano Performance-to-Score Transcription
Abstract: Transcribing expressive piano performances into scores requires interpreting individual note timings within an underlying metrical structure. However, score attributes are associated with notes, whereas beats may occur without coincident note onsets. We introduce DuET, a Dual-Encoder Transformer that jointly learns note-level performance MIDI-to-score (PM2S) transcription and frame-level beat and downbeat tracking. Bidirectional cross-attention connects note and frame encoders, while an autoregressive decoder alternates between their representations to predict structured score attributes. We further introduce TimeRoPE and Time-Pitch Rotary Positional Encoding (TPRoPE) to establish a shared performance-time reference and explicitly encode relative temporal and pitch relationships. Evaluations on ASAP, a classical piano dataset, and our curated Gangqinpu dataset, which spans multiple genres with a focus on popular piano music, demonstrate improvements in score timing and notated duration. Compared with the strongest baseline on each dataset, DuET reduces MUSTER mean error from 6.56% to 3.64% on Gangqinpu and from 11.30% to 11.22% on ASAP. Ablations support the benefits of frame-level context, time-based positional encoding, and decoder-history masking. Code, weights, and demos are available at https://github.com/wei-zeng98/DuET.
Medieval chant manuscripts digitized with new music recognition data
From Volpiano to Pixels: 30,000 Lines of OMR Ground Truth for Medieval Chant
Abstract: Optical music recognition (OMR) for medieval chant lacks training data linking manuscript images to musical symbols across notational families. Using existing Volpiano transcriptions from the Cantus Database, we created 30,567 image-target pairs from ten sources in eleven exports, including 339 verse fragments. Their target sequences contain 1,952,143 tokens. The pipeline locates staff systems, infers clefs and maps known pitches to staff positions. Six detector families handle the different layouts and notations. Where heuristics failed, two small U-Nets learned staff lines and clef letters from manual annotations. Reviews of sampled export lines found zero to four pitch or clef errors, but used different error definitions and do not provide a uniform audit of the corpus. A CRNN trained from scratch achieved a symbol error rate of 9.6 % on 3,086 test lines. The earlier model, trained mainly on Austrian sources of the 15th and 16th centuries, scored 45.3 %. In three separate training runs, each excluding one manuscript, error rates on the excluded manuscript were 21.5-31.0 %. Model-assisted alignment recovered a further 2,686 lines.