Papers for

digital imaging teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

VIEScore2 scores images and pinpoints defects on a grid

VIEScore2: Unified Image Evaluation with Spatially Grounded Explanations

Abstract: Existing synthetic image evaluators typically provide only a scalar quality score and do not identify the image regions that support it. We introduce VIEScore2, a unified evaluator for image generation and editing tasks with optional conditioning images. VIEScore2 represents an image as an N x N grid and jointly predicts quality scores and defect locations in a single model pass. Its text-native grid representation provides a common interface for heterogeneous spatial supervision and enables directly verifiable post-training objectives. We train on 38K examples spanning score-only, localization-only, and joint supervision across generation and editing tasks. Starting from supervised fine-tuning, we further apply GRPO to improve defect localization using rewards that combine cell-level Dice overlap, score accuracy, and output-format validity. A parameter-free parser converts the structured predictions into readable explanations. On the primary suite, VIEScore2 achieves an overall-score SRCC of 0.601, compared with 0.491 for Gemini-3-Flash, the strongest zero-shot general-purpose VLM baseline under matched inputs. For defect localization, VIEScore2 outperforms both general-purpose VLMs and specialized spatial evaluators on three of six benchmarks in per-image grid IoU and ranks among the top three on five, including datasets beyond its training sources.

Thu 1 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Images made or changed by computers are usually given a single quality score, but it's hard to know what parts of the image caused that score. This work introduces VIEScore2, a system that looks at a picture in a grid layout and gives both a quality score and marks spots where defects may be. It learns from many examples with different types of feedback, and it explains its assessment in an easy-to-read way. The system performs better than similar existing tools, both for scoring image quality and for showing where problems are.
Open → 2610.00994v1