Papers for

digital image security teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Featmark protects images from mimicry attacks using subtle semantic features

FeatMark: Feature-level Watermark Protection against Mimicry Attacks with Diffusion Models

Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models enable data-efficient "mimicry" attacks, wherein adversaries fine-tune the model on a handful of public photos to synthesize convincing forgeries of a target individual. A common countermeasure is to embed imperceptible, low-energy watermarks, yet recent studies show these signatures are brittle: modest post-processing or lightweight adversarial perturbations readily suppress detection, exposing a fundamental tension between imperceptibility and robustness. We introduce FeatMark, a watermarking framework that shifts from pixel-level, energy-starved perturbations to inconspicuous semantic features: small, scene-consistent micro-features that remain natural to humans while providing a stronger, machine-verifiable provenance signal. FeatMark builds domain-specific feature banks that encode each watermark as a compact concept program, pairing open-vocabulary semantic cues with reliable edit regions and instruction templates. It then automatically selects features that are both feasible and executable and injects them through modular, mask-guided concept editing, yielding highly localized, scene-consistent micro-edits that are difficult to perceive. We conduct extensive experiments across VGGFace2, CelebA-HQ, and WikiArt, evaluating against 10 strong watermark removal/purification attacks (including regeneration-style purification) and several bespoke adaptive attacks tailored to FeatMark, to assess perceptual fidelity, watermark detection accuracy, and robustness. We further demonstrate FeatMark's extensibility to video mimicry attacks. The results show FeatMark remains virtually impervious, withstanding all evaluated attacks with negligible bit-accuracy and fidelity degradation.

Fri 25 SeptCryptography and SecurityComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
When people use powerful AI models to create fake images by learning from just a few photos, it becomes hard to tell real from fake. Existing watermarks that slightly change pixels are easy to erase or hide. The authors introduce FeatMark, a way to hide tiny, natural-looking details that machines can detect but humans barely notice. These hidden features stay intact even after attempts to remove them, helping prove which images are genuine. They tested FeatMark on photos and videos and found it very hard for attackers to remove the watermark without ruining the image.
Open → 2609.30980v1

Local image watermarks struggle with geometric and editing changes

What Breaks Local Watermarks? A Robustness Benchmark for Local Invisible Image Watermarking

Abstract: Local image watermarking embeds an invisible signal into selected image regions rather than spreading it across the entire image, enabling payload recovery from specific objects or regions without perceptibly altering the image. Existing studies evaluate the robustness of payload recovery and localization under image transformations, but they often focus on their own proposed method, resulting in narrow evaluations with inconsistent choices of transformations, datasets, and metrics. These inconsistencies across studies limit direct comparisons across methods and muddle the overall picture of local watermark robustness. To address this gap, we present the first systematic robustness benchmark for local watermarks across 55 image transformations, including (i) signal distortions, (ii) changes in image coordinate alignment, (iii) indirect local edits, and (iv) direct watermark edits. The benchmark evaluates MaskWM, WAM, OmniGuard, TrustMark, and PixelSeal, all methods that either provide native localization or require minimal adaptation to support it. Our results show that all evaluated methods are vulnerable to some transformation, with MaskWM standing out as offering the strongest payload recovery and localization, although it has the lowest image quality in the clean setting. Synchronization further improves MaskWM's payload recovery under several geometric transformations, albeit at an additional cost to image quality. A key finding is that local watermark robustness depends strongly on the nature of the transformation: signal distortions are often tolerated by the strongest methods, while geometric misalignment and generative local edits, such as inpainting and outpainting, can completely impair payload recovery. We observe that payload recovery and localization are related but not interchangeable, and both strongly depend on the transformation's impact on the watermark region.

Tue 15 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceCryptography and Security
The gist
Invisible watermarks hidden in specific parts of images are meant to help recover information without changing what the picture looks like. The authors studied how well these local watermarks survive many different image changes, like edits or distortions. They tested five different watermarking methods and found that all can be broken by some kinds of changes, especially ones that move parts of the image or use AI-based editing. One method, MaskWM, was generally better at recovering watermarks but made the original image look worse. This work shows why it’s important to test watermarks against many types of changes to understand their weaknesses.
Open → 2609.16832v1