Papers for
digital humanities developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Image based prototypes improve document classification accuracy moderately
ProtoSemImage: Image-Valued Prototypes with Deformable Row Alignment for Interpretable Document Classification
Abstract: Prototypes in classification models are almost always vectors, and a vector has no readable form. This paper asks what happens when a prototype is an image. Documents give the question a natural form, because a document can be rendered as a multi-channel image in which every token becomes a pixel, so a class representative can take the same shape and the same channel semantics as the inputs it stands for. ProtoSemImage represents each class by one or more visual archetypes: prototype images in a four-channel HSV space whose channels carry named linguistic factors. A Skip-Gram objective learns that color space end to end through a four-dimensional bottleneck, discourse boundary rows become differentiable typed difference rows, and classification reduces to 2D visual template matching: a deformable row alignment between a document image and the archetype bank, in the spirit of dynamic time warping. Because the match is a spatial pattern comparison rather than a linear readout, the model reports where an input departs from its archetype and along which channel, and a generative head decodes each archetype back into text. The image representation works: it beats an otherwise identical model with vector prototypes in all three paired seeds, by between 4.3 and 11.8 points on a ten-class task. The distance-based matching does not. A diagnostic that keeps the representation fixed and swaps only the classifier recovers the sequence baselines, which locates a 20.6-point shortfall in the matching rather than in the color compression, and a benchmark built so that a pair of documents shares a bag of words and differs only in arrangement confirms the layout-preservation it was designed for. We report both directions, because for a representation whose whole purpose is inspect ability, the failure modes are as informative as the gains.
Language models evaluated for explaining cultural references with evidence
From annotation to reasoning: Culture in language models
Abstract: How should we evaluate language models when more than one interpretation can be right? Cultural benchmarks often test factual knowledge, agreement with survey responses, or recognition of a predefined meaning. These tasks leave open whether a model can explain how a cultural reference works in a particular text, support a reading with evidence, or revise it after criticism. This is a question of interpretive depth, complementary to the breadth of cultural coverage. We argue that literary interpretation offers a useful setting for studying these capabilities. We focus on cultural referencing and reuse: how texts invoke, repeat, and transform earlier expressions across historical and linguistic contexts. Our central claim is that literary scholars can disagree about an interpretation while recognizing the quality of its support. We propose linking evidence-centered benchmarks, evaluation that preserves scholarly disagreement, and model-development experiments on literary data, contextual resources, and scholarly feedback. Danish literature provides a concrete starting point, with implications for other languages and domains. The aim is to develop alternative evaluation strategies that go beyond conventional benchmark metrics and guide model development toward cultural robustness in AI systems.