Papers for

digital forensics teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Watermarking method secures AI images against removal attacks

Provably Secure Diffusion Watermarking Against Removal Adversaries with Batched Detector Access

Abstract: Recent latent-based watermarking methods can embed undetectable watermarks into AI-generated content. However, these approaches are vulnerable to removal attacks as their watermark detection boundaries are exposed, prompting the use of secret long-term transformations to hide these boundaries. We show that such defenses are insecure under a stronger threat model motivated by publicly reachable detectors: an adversary with batched detector access can reconstruct the transformations, permanently re-exposing the decision boundary. To address this, we propose a watermarking scheme based on a hybrid of long-term and one-time secret transformations, which prevents the reuse of structure across samples and keeps the long-term secret hidden. Besides undetectability, we show that this scheme is provably secure against removal adversaries with batched detector access, in the sense that no probabilistic polynomial-time adversary can achieve a non-negligible advantage over an adversary restricted to adding isotropic white-noise with a $\sqrt{2}\times$ larger perturbation budget, and we show this $\sqrt{2}$ factor to be tight. Evaluations on Stable Diffusion 2.1 and XL demonstrate the attack against the existing defense, and show that our scheme preserves generation quality and withstands common perturbations and targeted removal attacks.

Thu 29 OctCryptography and Security
The gist
Creating hidden watermarks in AI-generated images helps prove who made them, but attackers can remove these marks by figuring out how detection works. The authors show that attackers who can test many images can break current watermark protections by learning secret details. To fix this, they designed a new watermark that uses both permanent secrets and single-use secrets, making it much harder to remove without hurting the image. Their approach is proven mathematically secure against strong attackers and works well in real AI image systems.
Open → 2610.39189v1

Image forensics improved by trusted partial provenance data

Enhanced image forensics through partial C2PA-based provenance information

Abstract: Cryptographically verifiable C2PA-based Content Credentials (CCs) can be attached to freshly acquired or generated digital images but also to already existing ones with no previous provenance information, for instance after processing through trusted C2PA-enabled software tools. The latter case leads to images with so-called partial CCs, which capture only the last operations applied, while prior provenance remains unknown and can be investigated through signal forensics. This paper addresses the forensic analysis of such images, highlighting the opportunity to leverage the partial CCs as additional trusted knowledge to adapt forensic detectors towards the statistical characteristics of the image under analysis and mitigate potential distribution shifts. To this end, a two-step strategy is envisioned: (i) reconstructing the operations applied by the last signer through a structural analysis of the partial CCs; (ii) exploiting the obtained reconstruction to enhance the forensic detector of the analyst through an adaptation process. An empirical analysis on partial CCs produced by commercial C2PA-enabled software tools through different editing operations is carried out, providing evidence on the feasibility of the reconstruction in practical cases. An experimental case study on the forensic task of synthetic image detection is then presented, showing that the proposed strategy can significantly enhance the performance of state-of-the-art detectors on test images that are postprocessed via C2PA-enabled software tools after being generated/acquired.

Wed 28 OctCryptography and SecurityArtificial IntelligenceMultimedia
The gist
It can be hard to tell if an image was digitally altered when you only know about the most recent changes made to it. The authors show how using partial provenance data—records about the last edits made with trusted software—helps forensic tools better detect manipulations like synthetic images. They developed a two-step method to recover these recent edits and then adjust forensic checks accordingly. Their experiments show this improves the ability to spot fake or altered images even after they go through trusted editing programs.
Open → 2610.38639v1

Spectralcanary plants hidden low-frequency signals for image model auditing

SpectralCanary: Embarrassingly Simple Low-Frequency Traces for T2I Dataset-Use Auditing

Abstract: Auditing whether a text-to-image (T2I) model was fine-tuned on a particular image collection is difficult: a model can absorb collection-level visual characteristics without reproducing training images. Proactive dataset-use auditing plants a shared signal in a dataset before release, then later checks whether that signal appears in a suspect model's generated outputs. Existing approaches often trade off verifiability, fidelity, robustness, and deployability. We introduce $\textbf{SpectralCanary}$, which uses a smooth low-pass mask to blend a fixed canary image into every collection image while leaving captions unchanged and requiring neither auxiliary generation nor per-image optimization. A lightweight verifier detects the transferred signal in suspect-model outputs. Across eight tests on the Pokemon dataset and three realistic data transformations, spanning two architectures families, SpectralCanary achieves the highest average per-generation TPR@$1\%$ FPR ($91.1\%$) and fixed threshold model-level accuracy using 30 generations ($94.8\%$) among the evaluated methods. Across five datasets spanning artistic, medical, satellite, and fashion domains with SD3.5, SpectralCanary averages $92.4\%$ per-generation TPR@$1\%$ FPR while preserving the released images (SSIM $0.989$, LPIPS $0.022$) with a near-zero mean change FID (mean $Δ$FID $0.05$) across datasets. Matched-energy ablations on Pokemon and ROCOv2 support our design choice, low-frequency placement transfers more reliably compared to mid/high-frequency placement. Under the evaluated adaptive attacks, the most effective removal requires aggressive modification and incurs more than $25$ $Δ$FID points. These results identify low-frequency visual signals as effective carriers for collection-level T2I audit traces.

Thu 22 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMachine Learning
The gist
It can be hard to tell if an image-generation AI was trained on a specific set of pictures, since the AI might learn general features without copying exact images. The authors propose SpectralCanary, which subtly mixes a special low-frequency pattern called a canary into every image of a dataset before it’s shared. Later, if a model is suspected of using that dataset, a simple check can find this hidden pattern in images it creates. Tests show this method works well across different data types and models, and the hidden signals are hard to remove without ruining image quality.
Open → 2610.31659v1

Llm assisted digital forensics vulnerable to attacker planted text injections

Prompt Injection Through Forensic Evidence: A Taxonomy and Proof of Concept of Anti-Forensic Attacks on LLM-Assisted Digital Investigations

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are entering digital forensics as examination assistants and autonomous agents. Digital forensics inverts the usual setting for indirect prompt injection: the evidence under analysis is attacker-controlled by definition, and the examiner is obliged to read it closely. This makes the reasoning layer a new anti-forensic target, next to the classical ones of data and tools. Classical anti-forensic taxonomies do not cover it, and prompt injection defences do not anticipate it. We extend the anti-forensic model to reflect the manipulation of reasoning, and present a taxonomy of attacks carried through adversarial evidence: an attacker selects an objective, a technique, a payload location, and a concealment method. We observe a perception gap, i.e., the fact that deterministic tools, the human examiner, and the model perceive the same evidence differently, which is what lets an injection reach the model unseen by the examiner. We demonstrate three attacks against an LLM-assisted analysis pipeline, changing a reported conclusion, writing attacker-chosen content to the analyst's workstation, and causing outbound network traffic, each driven only by text planted on the seized device. Mitigations to these attacks are also proposed.

Wed 21 OctCryptography and Security
The gist
Digital forensics experts now use large language models (LLMs) to help analyze digital evidence. The authors found that attackers can hide tricky text inside evidence that fools both human examiners and these AI models, causing misleading conclusions or even malicious actions on the analyst's machine. They created a system to classify and demonstrate these attacks and suggested ways to reduce the risks. This work shows new challenges when AI tools analyze potentially harmful digital evidence.
Open → 2610.29747v1

Prnu fingerprints remain identifiable on modern smartphone images

A New Hope for PRNU on Modern Smartphones? Evidence That Device-Specific Fingerprints Survive Computational Photography

Abstract: Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) is widely regarded as the most reliable marker for source camera identification. Recent studies, however, report high correlations between images and fingerprints from different modern smartphones, which calls into question the discriminative power of PRNU on these devices. Using 30 recent smartphones under controlled acquisition conditions (e.g., no digital zoom), we investigate whether the fingerprint itself is at fault or the way it is compared. We find that a component shared by all fingerprints of the same model inflates the standard signed peak-to-correlation energy (sPCE). To counter this, we propose $Δ$sPCE: the sPCE between a query image and a candidate camera's fingerprint, minus the mean sPCE between that image and the fingerprints of the remaining candidates, in the spirit of T-norm score normalization. $Δ$sPCE improves attribution accuracy, suggesting that the device-specific PRNU signal is still present. Although the limited dataset size and the dependence of $Δ$sPCE on the candidate camera set currently restrict operational applicability, these results suggest that PRNU-based attribution of modern smartphones remains feasible when fingerprints are compared appropriately.

Sun 18 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
It has been hard to tell which modern smartphone took a picture because the usual method, PRNU, sometimes gives confusing results. The authors show that part of the problem is how comparisons are done, not the fingerprint itself. They designed a new way to compare PRNU fingerprints, called ΔsPCE, which better tells apart individual phones even of the same model. This means smartphones still have unique camera marks, but you need smarter comparisons to find them.
Open → 2610.25438v1

Residual subspace experts improve image forgery detection generalization

RiSE: Residual Subspace Expert for Generalizable Text-Centric Image Forgery Localization

Abstract: As AI-assisted image editing becomes increasingly prevalent, Text-Centric Image Forgery Localization (TFL) is essential for protecting trust in financial and legal records. However, we observe that existing TFL detectors predominantly rely on Full-Parameter Fine-Tuning (FPFT) and fail to generalize to unseen forgery types because FPFT can induce low-rank feature collapse and overfit training artifacts. Meanwhile, prior detectors capture diverse forgery traces with a single unified representation, making subtle traces entangled and difficult to learn. To address these challenges, we propose RiSE, a Residual Subspace Expert model that preserves pre-trained priors by freezing principal SVD components and adapting only the residual subspaces with a ViT-only segmentor to avoid feature collapse. RiSE introduces forgery-aware residual experts, where each expert is trained independently on a training subset with a particular forgery type, and we show that cross-domain localization performance improves consistently as more experts are added. At inference, we introduce Latent Perturbation Confidence (LPC), which selects the most confident expert by analytically computing the latent-perturbed output. LPC enables efficient confidence estimation with a single forward pass, avoiding repeated forward passes on perturbed samples and improving expert selection. By training on synthetic forgery data, RiSE with 1 expert outperforms prior methods on real-world forgery images by 20.4% while reducing training steps by 10 times. Scaling the number of experts to 9 yields a 35.8% gain. RiSE remains effective with DCT feature, even when the majority of the parameters is frozen with RGB-only pretraining. Code: https://github.com/KahimWong/RiSE.

Sat 17 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting fake parts in images with text is important to keep financial and legal records trustworthy. Current methods often fail to spot new types of fakes because they overfit known examples and mix subtle fake traces. The authors propose a new model named RiSE that freezes main learned features and adapts only leftover parts, training separate experts for different forgery types. This approach improves detecting unseen forgeries and selects the best expert quickly. Testing shows that RiSE beats previous methods by a large margin while requiring less training.
Open → 2610.24480v1

Saliency maps reveal unique flaws in AI generated images

Can We Use Saliency Maps for the Evaluation of Generative Image Models?

Abstract: Evaluating generative image models remains challenging, as commonly used metrics depend on fixed pretrained feature extractors optimized for different tasks that do not always align with human realism perception across datasets and model families. To address this limitation, we investigate a human-inspired evaluation framework that avoids representations learned for unrelated tasks. Specifically, we train a generator-specific classifier to distinguish real images from samples produced by a given model and analyze its decisions using saliency maps. Across diverse benchmarks, we observe that these classifiers learn generator-specific artifacts rather than a universal notion of "fakeness", exhibiting strong accuracy and limited cross-generator transfer. This makes saliency analysis particularly informative: the resulting attribution maps highlight visual cues and structural irregularities characteristic of each model's outputs. By combining classification accuracy and saliency information, we obtain a composite score aligned with human judgments, without relying on large pretrained backbones and using only real and generated samples from the evaluated model.

Fri 16 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
It is hard to judge how good AI-generated images look because usual tests rely on other AI tools trained for different tasks. The authors found a way to test these images better by training a special AI to tell real images from fake ones made by a specific model. This AI then shows which parts of the image helped it decide, highlighting unique flaws each image generator has. Combining the AI’s accuracy and these highlighted parts gives a score that matches human opinions better and doesn’t need big pre-trained AI models.
Open → 2610.23411v1

Transformer method improves detection of edited image parts

DINO-FIL: Multi-Layer Transformer Fusion for Generative Inpainting Forgery Localization

Abstract: We propose DINO-FIL, a transformer-based framework for pixel-level localization of generative image forgeries. The method leverages multi-layer representations from a pretrained DINOv3 ViT-H+/16 encoder combined with a lightweight fusion decoder to capture both semantic structure and fine-grained texture inconsistencies introduced by image editing. By aggregating intermediate transformer features across depths, the model improves sensitivity to subtle, spatially localized artifacts that are often missed by standard single-layer approaches. We evaluate DINO-FIL in a cross-dataset setting, training on B-Free and testing on Beyond the Brush, CocoGlide, TGIF, and SAGI-D. The model achieves strong generalization, outperforming existing baselines on average and on four of five evaluated datasets, while maintaining a high true negative rate on pristine images.

Thu 15 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Finding fake parts in images is tricky because the changes can be tiny and blend in well. The authors created DINO-FIL, a method that uses multiple layers from a powerful AI model to spot these subtle edits more accurately. By combining details from different steps inside the model, they catch small clues that other methods miss. They tested it on many types of edited images and it worked better than older tools while not falsely accusing real images.
Open → 2610.21780v1

EvisStress improves face forgery detection with clearer explanations

EviStress: Evidence Stress Learning for Generalizable Face Forgery Detection with Textual Explanations

Abstract: The rapid spread of face forgeries on the Web challenges the credibility of visual content. In practical Web environments, manipulated media originate from evolving generation pipelines and undergo diverse processing during dissemination, making reliable authenticity assessment under unseen manipulations and visual changes a critical challenge. We observe that a standard LoRA-adapted CLIP detector exhibits uneven patch-level decision dependence, concen trating a disproportionate share of class-specific relevance on a small fraction of visual patches. To improve robustness to variations in such highly dependent evidence, we propose EviStress, a two-stage framework for generalizable face forgery detection with textual explanations. In the first stage, Evidence-Targeted Patch Perturbation (ETPP) estimates patch dependence from global, relational, and semantic cues and assigns positively correlated perturbation probabilities, explicitly stress-testing highly dependent visual evidence during training. We further introduce Discriminative Variation Preservation (DVP), which constrains the residual between clean and perturbed representations to retain authenticity discriminative information. In the second stage, Intrinsic Evidence Instruction Tuning (IEIT) transfers the adapted CLIP encoder into LLaVA as its vision tower and performs parameter-efficient multimodal instruction tuning, enabling authenticity prediction and textual explanation directly from the learned forgery-sensitive representation without an external detector. Experiments demonstrate improved cross-dataset and cross-method generalization and corruption robustness, with the multimodal model providing authenticity predictions and human-readable explanations.

Mon 12 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Fake face images are spreading quickly online, making it hard to know what is real or fake. The authors found that typical detectors rely too much on only a few small parts of an image, which makes them less reliable with new types of fakes or changes in images. They created a method called EviStress that stresses the parts the detector depends on and teaches it to still recognize fakes robustly. Their system can also explain why it thinks an image is fake in simple text, helping users understand the decision.
Open → 2610.16879v1

Forensic text recovered from low resolution document thumbnails

Forensic Text Recovery from Document Thumbnails Using Text-Aware U-Net

Abstract: Forensic analysis of low-resolution Word thumbnails presents a significant challenge because these artifacts may constitute the only remaining visual evidence of deleted documents. Standard Optical Character Recognition (OCR) tools perform poorly on such severely degraded images, creating a critical bottleneck in forensic evidence recovery. Although deep learning architectures, such as U-Net, can improve visual image quality, models optimized solely using pixel-based loss functions tend to favor visual smoothness over the structural fidelity required for accurate text recognition. To address this limitation, we propose a text-aware restoration framework designed for forensic triage. The proposed approach employs a U-Net architecture guided by a hybrid optimization strategy that integrates pixel-level fidelity with machine-readable text constraints. Specifically, an OCR-based Normalized Levenshtein Distance (NLD) metric is used during model selection to prioritize the recovery of an accurate character topology. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly reduces the NLD, enabling reliable recovery of machine-readable text from severely degraded thumbnails.

Sun 11 OctCryptography and Security
The gist
Documents deleted from a computer sometimes leave behind tiny, blurry thumbnail images that are hard to read. Standard tools that convert images to text struggle with these low-quality pictures. The authors created a new computer method that cleans up these thumbnails while keeping the letters and words true to their original shape. This method uses a special way to check if the recovered text matches the original, improving text recovery accuracy. Their approach helps recover readable words from very blurry thumbnails, making it easier to find hidden or deleted document contents.
Open → 2610.15902v1

Unified model improves motion blur removal across cameras and scenes

UniDeblur: Unified Motion Deblurring via Fourier Convolution Learning

Abstract: Image deblurring is a fundamental task in computer vision, yet existing methods mainly specialize in isolated scenarios. Consequently, the deblurring performance of these models drops significantly across scenarios with different cameras and image contents. This motivates the development of a unified motion deblurring framework that can handle diverse blur patterns. To this end, we construct a multi-source dataset and develop a data pruning and quality control pipeline. Then, to restore blur images with various motion blur kernels across different scenarios, we propose a unified motion deblurring framework via Fourier Convolution Learning. Existing deblurring networks usually rely on pixel-level mappings and overlook the convolutional nature of blur. Thus, the network mostly fits the image content itself rather than learning the convolution process, making it difficult to handle multi-source blur images. Instead of relying on spatial mapping, we perform blur-adaptive global filter learning in Fourier space, which avoids the limited spatial support of kernel estimation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our unified model effectively handles motion blurs across diverse sources and scenes, achieving competitive performance across both in-domain and OOD benchmarks. Code will be released at github.com/DeepMed-Lab-ECNU/Single-Image-Deblur.

Fri 9 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Photos often get blurry when the camera or objects move, and fixing this blur is tricky because it varies a lot depending on the camera and scene. The authors created a new approach that learns to reverse blur more universally by focusing on how blur works as a kind of image filter, instead of just trying to fix pixels directly. They trained their method on a large mix of different blurry images and showed it can effectively clear up many types of motion blur from various sources. This could help make clearer photos in many real-world situations.
Open → 2610.12941v1

Split key watermark detection balances transparency and security for large language models

Could LLM Watermark Detection be Public?

Abstract: Watermarking large language models is popular for tracing chatbot and agentic outputs, yet detectors remain unreleased since exposing them could let attackers do targeted edits with the detector's feedback. However, watermarks are already vulnerable to uninformed tampering attacks. We thus first quantify whether a public detector would be an additional liability in a deployment setting at varying levels of access, from token-level scores to a binary verdict. Second, we introduce a split-key public-private watermarking method that exposes one key through a public detector while keeping the other for full verification and forensics. An informed attacker can only move the public signal, creating an imbalance between public and private scores. We introduce a statistical test for this imbalance, and combine it with the full key verdict in a two-stage mechanism. Third, we evaluate the split-key method on a wide range of removal and forgery attacks, comparing the uninformed to detector-informed settings. Public detection improves removal only at small edit budgets, since plain rephrasing already strips the watermark at a lower quality cost, but it does enable forgery, which the private pipeline can identify. Overall, releasing half of the watermark enables transparency and interoperability, and tampering with the released half stays detectable. This bounds the provider's liability and questions the need to keep detectors fully private.

Thu 8 OctCryptography and SecurityMachine Learning
The gist
Watermarks in large language models help track and verify AI-generated text but usually require secret detectors to prevent attackers from removing them. The authors studied whether making part of the watermark detection public would create risks or benefits. They propose a method that divides the watermark into two parts: a public part for transparency and a private part for strong verification. Their approach shows that attackers can only affect the public watermark, while the private part still helps catch tampering.
Open → 2610.12106v1

Relative patch response learning improves ai generated image detection accuracy

Relative Patch Response Learning for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection

Abstract: Generative models can now synthesize highly realistic images, simultaneously increasing the risks of misinformation and visual forgery. Therefore, detecting AI-generated images becomes more essential, and a reliable detector must generalize to unseen generators and stay robust to unseen perturbations in the wild. Existing detectors are typically trained on either independently collected real and generated images or aligned real-generated pairs designed to mitigate content bias. Building on aligned pairs, recent methods form a mixed view by replacing some patches of the real image with their generated counterparts. However, we find that self-attention lets real and generated patches interact, so the feature of each patch no longer reflects its own source alone. This contextual shift makes a per-patch source label an imprecise target. To this end, we propose Relative Patch Response Learning (PRL). Instead of labeling each patch, PRL compares the same patch across two mixed views of an aligned pair and learns from its patch response, the change of its score between the views. (i) To give precise supervision under the contextual shift, a relative response objective measures the responses of source-changed patches against those of source-unchanged patches, which respond to the shift alone. (ii) To provide a reliable reference for the shift, a reference coherence objective keeps each group of source-unchanged patches moving as a whole. (iii) Since the two views contain different amounts of generated content, an area ranking objective asks the view with the larger generated area to have a higher mean patch score. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superior performance of PRL, which surpasses the best prior methods by 4.3% and 5.9% in average balanced accuracy across eight standard and three in-the-wild benchmarks, respectively.

Thu 8 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
AI can now create very realistic images, which can be used to spread false information. Detecting these AI-generated images is hard, especially when the detector encounters new AI models or image changes it hasn't seen before. The authors found that existing methods struggle because they confuse the source of image patches when analyzing them contextually. They introduced a new approach called Relative Patch Response Learning that compares how individual parts of an image differ across two versions, making detection more precise. Their method performed better than previous ones on multiple tests.
Open → 2610.11876v1

Illumination prior does not improve face swap detection accuracy

Does an Illumination Prior Help Face-Swap Detection? A Controlled Study of Temporal Self-Blended Images

Abstract: Self-blended images are widely used to train face-swap detectors, but primarily capture blending artifacts. We investigate whether adding illumination inconsistencies improves detection. Temporal Self-Blended Images (T-SBI) transfer lighting statistics between frames of the same video, with the mismatch controlled by luminance difference (ΔL). Using five training regimes and a three-seed comparison of high- and low-ΔL training, we find no evidence of illumination-specific improvements. AUC differences remain within seed variability across four datasets, and an analysis of 506,328 attribute-binned samples shows no preferential reduction in errors under harsh lighting. Instead, T-SBI shifts prediction scores, changing optimal thresholds by approximately 0.34 on FaceForensics++ and 0.30 on Celeb-DF, making comparisons at a fixed threshold misleading. However, T-SBI improves robustness to heavy JPEG compression on DFDC (AUC 0.780 versus 0.696), potentially reflecting greater reliance on low-frequency cues. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating training methods against their intended targets and accounting for threshold effects.

Thu 8 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Detecting face-swaps in videos often relies on spotting blending errors where two images are joined. The authors tested if adding differences in lighting between frames helps detect these swaps better. Their study found that changing lighting doesn’t actually improve detection accuracy but does shift detection thresholds, which can affect result interpretation. However, these lighting changes made the detectors more robust to heavy image compression.
Open → 2610.11706v1

Camera noise signals add no extra help to face swap detection

Camera-Noise Residuals for Face-Swap Detection: Redundant, Not Complementary, and Why

Abstract: Fusing a learned camera-noise fingerprint with an RGB appearance backbone is an appealing route to generator-independent deepfake detection, because the noise residual is grounded in image-formation physics rather than in the texture statistics of a particular generator. We test, on FaceForensics++, whether a Noiseprint++ residual channel carries information \emph{complementary} to an RGB Xception backbone for face-swap detection. A three-model ablation (RGB-only, residual-only, late-fusion) shows that fusion does not improve over RGB alone and that the residual branch alone is near chance. A seven-level bottleneck diagnostic localizes the cause: the noise maps do carry a discriminative signal, but it is statistical---carried by the per-sample first and second moments (mean, variance, energy) of the residual---and the per-sample \texttt{InstanceNorm} layer placed at the noise-branch input, following the TruFor template, standardizes exactly those moments away (five-fold cross-validated AUC drops from $0.747$ to $0.554$). A context-crop control rules out cropping geometry, and two fixed-fusion variants that remove the bottleneck recover the statistical signal yet still fail to beat RGB on every dataset. We conclude that, on this manipulation distribution, the noise residual is redundant with RGB rather than complementary, and we give concrete guidance for practitioners adopting noise-residual fusion for face-swap detection.

Thu 8 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Detecting fake face swap images by looking at camera noise patterns seems promising because noise comes from the camera, not the fake image generator. The authors tested combining noise patterns with regular color image analysis, but found that adding noise information does not improve detection accuracy. The noise data mostly carries simple statistics that get removed by common normalization methods, making it redundant rather than complementary to color image features. So, in this context, using noise patterns does not give extra clues beyond normal image analysis.
Open → 2610.11683v1

Evolving AI image detection adapts to new generators without old data

EvoKnow: Continual Knowledge Evolution for AI-Generated Image Detection

Abstract: AI-generated image detectors are commonly trained on fixed generator domains and become difficult to maintain as new generative models emerge. Continual adaptation is challenging because replaying historical generated images is costly, whereas updating shared parameters with limited current-domain data can overwrite prior forensic knowledge. We propose EvoKnow, a replay-free framework that formulates continual AI-generated image detection as forensic knowledge evolution. EvoKnow preserves a shared forensic basis learned from base domains, incrementally adds isolated residual experts for complementary generator-relevant evidence, and retrieves expertise through an Analytical Incremental Router (AIR) updated in closed form from current-stage generated images and accumulated sufficient statistics. Experiments demonstrate effective cross-generator generalization, few-shot expansion, and long-horizon continual adaptation. With ten generated images per arriving generator, EvoKnow achieves 96.70% average accuracy on non-base GenImage generators and 94.48% accuracy on Chameleon without target-benchmark adaptation. Under a strict replay-free continual learning protocol, EvoKnow achieves state-of-the-art continual learning performance, attaining 96.32% mean stage-wise accuracy and 4.32% average forgetting.

Thu 8 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Detecting AI-generated images is hard because new image generators keep appearing, and detectors trained on old ones often fail on new types. The authors propose EvoKnow, a method that learns to identify new AI image styles without needing to store old images or forget past knowledge. It works by keeping a shared base understanding and adding small expert components tailored to each new generator, helping the system stay accurate as new AI images arrive. Tests show EvoKnow stays reliable over time, even with very few new examples.
Open → 2610.11381v1

Multi-model system detects deepfake images with visual explanations

MSU Team at the Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge 2026: Grounded Artifact Evidence for Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Recent advances in generative image models have made many manipulated images highly realistic, raising the need for detectors that are not only accurate but also able to provide visual evidence for their decisions. In this paper, we present our solution to the Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge [2] on the XPlainVerse dataset [1], where systems are required to predict whether an image is real or fake and generate both complex and simple explanations grounded in visible forensic cues. Our method follows a modular detection-and-explanation design. For the real/fake decision, we build a multi-backbone detector that combines several DINOv3 models with Mesorch manipulation-localization features, bringing together pretrained visual representations, DCT-aware cues, and multi-scale forensic information. To inject explanation evidence into the detector, we use a Grounding-DINO-based pseudo-mask generation pipeline that converts local artifact descriptions from training explanations into weak patch- level supervision for an Artifact Evidence Map. We further introduce a local patch-level contrastive objective that separates artifact and authenticity evidence in the detector feature space without requiring paired images or pixel-level manipulation masks. For language output, we use class-conditional Qwen3-VL models to generate complex explanations for fake and real predictions, followed by a GRPO-optimized text simplification model. The proposed methods were trained and evaluated on the challenge subset of XPlainVerse. On the full test split, our submission achieves 0.9349 detection accuracy, 0.5571 explanation score, and a 0.7456 final challenge score.

Wed 7 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Fake images made by AI can look very real, which makes it hard to tell if a photo is real or fake. The authors created a system that not only detects fake images accurately but also highlights the parts of the image that show evidence of manipulation. Their method uses multiple AI models working together to recognize subtle clues and then explains its decisions in simple and detailed language. This helps people understand why the image was flagged as fake or real.
Open → 2610.09952v1

Image manipulation localization improves with explicit artifact modeling

Can We Model the Artifacts Explicitly? Disentangle Artifacts via Pairwise Edit Relations for Image Manipulation Localization

Abstract: Image Manipulation Localization (IML) is commonly formulated as a fully supervised learning task that estimates the optimal manipulation mask $y$ for a given image $x$. In this work, we first reveal the latent nature of artifacts and thus reinterpret IML as a latent-variable problem, $P(y|x)=\int P(y|z)\,P(z|x)\,dz$, where $z$ denotes the artifacts. Following this interpretation, we pinpoint the cause for the current IML models' insufficiency as their implicit artifacts modeling strategy, highlighting the necessity of modeling $z$ in an explicit manner. Without direct labels, feature disentanglement is the most appropriate solution for this explicit modeling. Accordingly, we propose a two-stage learning paradigm with the Pairwise Artifacts Learning (PAL) and Standard Localization (SL) phases to estimate $P(z|x)$ and $P(y|z)$ via edit relations. To support our edit-relation-based learning, we further curate EditGroup-45K, a source-anchored dataset organized into edit groups for pair construction. Extensive experiments show that our PAL paradigm yields consistent improvements across diverse IML architectures, and empirical analyses further verify that PAL does capture artifacts explicitly through feature disentanglement. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/venus-guangjian/PAL

Tue 6 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Spotting edited parts in photos is usually done by guessing where changes were made without directly looking for signs of editing. The authors show that these signs, called artifacts, can be thought of as hidden clues and should be modeled explicitly. They designed a new two-step learning method that teaches a system to find these artifacts by comparing pairs of related images. This approach helps better identify manipulated areas and works with different existing methods.
Open → 2610.07916v1

Deepfake detectors struggle as generative images become harder to verify

Certification of Real Images through Calibrated Content Authentication

Abstract: Generative models can synthesize high-quality inauthentic multimedia content that is already being misused at scale. We evaluate twenty deepfake detectors against ten generators released in the last four years and find accuracy decreasing over time, from near-perfect 99.5% to 76%. Adversarial perturbations further reduce every baseline detector to below 2% accuracy, effectively inverting the detector's assigned label. We argue that this unreliability reflects a fundamental ambiguity: generators can reproduce authentic content exactly (e.g., through memorization), so content alone cannot reveal the true provenance label.For this reason, content produced by a generator must admit a faithful reconstruction by that same generator, and finding such a reconstruction makes synthetic provenance plausible and authenticity plausibly deniable.We therefore propose and evaluate a detection paradigm that outputs a calibrated prediction of whether authenticity is plausibly deniable: a faithful reconstruction by any known generator establishes plausible deniability, while calibration bounds how often content from known generators fails to be reproduced. Our evaluation shows that (i) our detector can be calibrated so that at most 1% of generated content is wrongly certified, an operating point at which most baseline detectors reach near-zero recall, including the strongest with 93% accuracy; (ii) calibrating a stricter security threshold on attacked samples preserves this bound against adaptive adversaries within the evaluated bounded-perturbation attack space, whose perturbations break every baseline, but does not cover arbitrary adversarial transformations; and (iii) post-hoc verifiability is eroding, as 1,116 of 3,000 Reddit images resist reproduction by a 2022 generator, but only 55 to 79 resist reproduction by 2024 generators.

Mon 5 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Deepfake images made by AI models are becoming harder to detect accurately as the technology improves and new tricks can fool detectors. The authors show that existing detectors perform worse over time and can be easily tricked by small changes to images. They propose a new way to check if an image could have been created by a known AI model by seeing if the model can recreate the image, helping decide if its source is uncertain. This approach is more reliable and can be adjusted to limit wrong certifications, even against some tricky attacks.
Open → 2610.05870v1

Latent frequency masking weakens invisible watermarks in ai images

Exploring Weaknesses of Generative Image Watermarks against Latent Frequency Masking

Abstract: Invisible watermarking has become a central tool for tracing AI-generated images, but its robustness against adaptive removal attacks remains an open security question. We introduce Latent Frequency Masking, an attack that erases watermark evidence by replacing selected Fourier coefficients in the latent representation of a watermarked image. The replacement can be sampled from Gaussian noise for efficiency or derived from diffusion regeneration for improved image preservation. We provide a theoretical distortion bound relating the change between the reconstructed adversarial image and the masked latent-frequency perturbation. We evaluate the proposed attack against six diffusion watermarking methods on images generated from DiffusionDB and MS-COCO prompts. Latent Frequency Masking removes or substantially weakens several watermarks while preserving perceptual quality and achieving favorable runtime compared with existing attacks. These results identify latent-frequency manipulation as a practical attack surface and highlight the need to include such attacks in robustness evaluations of generative image watermarking.

Thu 1 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceMultimedia
The gist
Invisible watermarks help track AI-generated images but can sometimes be removed by clever attacks. The authors found a new way to erase these watermarks by changing specific frequency parts inside the hidden data of an image. Their method can either use random noise or a more advanced technique to keep the image looking good while removing the watermark. They tested this attack on different watermark systems and showed it can often hide or remove the watermark without hurting the image's quality. This shows that image watermarking needs to be tested against this kind of frequency-based attack.
Open → 2610.02010v1

Image forgery localization improves with diverse new benchmark and model

GIFTBench: Diagnosing Generalization in Image Forgery Localization and Informing Model Design

Abstract: Reliable evaluation of image forgery localization (IFL) requires assessing models under diverse distribution changes, yet existing benchmarks often cover limited manipulation conditions or entangle multiple factors in cross-dataset evaluation. Consequently, aggregate performance provides an incomplete view of localization generalization. We introduce GIFTBench, a multi-axis benchmark of 115,013 manipulated images with pixel-level annotations spanning manipulation source, semantic target, editing operation, and composition complexity. GIFTBench supports axis-specific transfer analysis and evaluation on twelve external datasets. Its diagnostic studies reveal asymmetric cross-source transfer, recall-dominated failures, and heterogeneous degradation across semantic, operational, and compositional changes. Beyond diagnosis, the scale and diversity of GIFTBench provide a substantially broader training distribution than conventional IFL datasets. Training representative localizers on GIFTBench consistently improves their aggregate transfer to external datasets, showing that the benchmark serves not only as an evaluation tool but also as an effective training resource for cross-domain localization. Guided by the diagnostic findings, we further develop ForenScope, a detection and localization framework combining classification-adapted representations with multi-depth, multi-scale spatial features, learned layer fusion, and selective coarse-scale conditioning. Experiments show improved cross-dataset localization while retaining image-level detection capability. The GIFTBench dataset showcase page is available at https://giftbench-preview.doudoudouya337.chatgpt.site.

Thu 1 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting exactly where images have been digitally altered is hard because changes can appear in many different ways. The authors created GIFTBench, a huge collection of manipulated images with detailed labels capturing different types of edits. This helps understand what kinds of edits make detection models fail and lets developers train models that work better across many scenarios. They also designed ForenScope, a new model that uses these insights to locate altered areas more accurately across different image sets. Their work makes forgery detection more reliable and adaptable.
Open → 2610.01778v1

Deepfake detectors improve by preserving diverse forgery clues

Revisiting Cross-Reconstruction for Generalizable Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Existing image forgery detectors often suffer from generalization to unseen manipulation methods due to the limited ability to capture transferable forensic cues. Recent cross-reconstruction based methods attempt to improve generalization through semantic-artifact disentanglement, but typically align heterogeneous artifacts across generators and exclude artifact representations during reconstruction, which may overlook the inherent diversity and visual cues of manipulation artifacts. In this work, we revisit cross-reconstruction and introduce an artifact-oriented disentanglement framework for robust image forgery detection. We argue that \textbf{artifact diversity}, i.e., the intrinsic variations of manipulation artifacts introduced by different generation processes, contains complementary forensic cues rather than undesirable domain variations. Instead of enforcing explicit artifact alignment, our framework preserves diverse artifact characteristics through semantically aligned cross-generator reconstruction. Furthermore, we incorporate artifact representations into the reconstruction process and introduce a masked frequency-aware reconstruction strategy to emphasize manipulation-related residuals while reducing semantic interference. This design enables the model to learn transferable forensic representations from diverse artifacts. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate improvements under both cross-dataset and cross-generator evaluation settings. Further analysis and ablation studies validate the effectiveness of artifact diversity preservation and artifact-aware cross-reconstruction.

Thu 1 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting fake images made by AI can be tricky because different fake image creators leave different kinds of clues. Previous methods tried to find common patterns by forcing these clues to look the same, but this paper shows it’s better to keep those differences. The authors propose a new way that pays attention to the unique details of each fake image and uses them to better spot forgeries. Their approach helps detectors work well even on new types of fake images they've never seen before.
Open → 2610.01544v1

Agentic reasoning improves explainable detection of fake images

Agentic Tool-Augmented Reasoning for Explainable Image Forgery Detection

Abstract: Conventional image forgery detection methods produce binary scores or pixel-level masks without interpretable evidence, while recent multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based approaches generate post-hoc explanations of predetermined classification results rather than reasoning from evidence. Inspired by the forensic workflow of human judicial experts, we propose Agentic Tool-Augmented Reasoning (ATAR), a framework integrating 22 specialized forensic tools across seven complementary domains to autonomously detect, localize, and explain image forgeries through multi-turn reasoning. A Dual-Stream Forensic Reasoning paradigm combines a high-level semantic anomaly path, which magnifies suspicious regions for fine-grained inspection, with a low-level forgery artifact path, which invokes forensic tools to extract objective evidence. We further introduce Forensics Curriculum Learning: during General Experience SFT, an automated teacher-student mentoring pipeline synthesizes multi-turn tool-usage reasoning trajectories; during Forensic Scene RL, a Tool Prior Curriculum guides early tool exploration and progressively transfers control to the agent, while a Structured Evidence Reward provides fine-grained process-level supervision. Experiments across IMDL, Deepfake detection, DMDL, and AIGC detection show that ATAR achieves 78.5% average image-level F1 on six zero-shot IMDL benchmarks, surpassing the strongest MLLM baseline by 11.8 percentage points, and remains competitive with specialized detectors on other tasks while producing substantially more faithful and grounded explanations.

Wed 30 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting fake images usually means simply saying if an image is real or fake without explaining why. This paper introduces a new method called ATAR that uses many special forensic tools working together like human experts do to find and explain image fakes step-by-step. It looks for strange areas and specific signs of tampering, then explains its findings. The authors show their method works better than previous approaches and gives clearer explanations about why an image is flagged as fake.
Open → 2609.39066v1

Ai generated image detection improves when looking at small patches

Look Closer: Patch-wise Supervision for AI-Generated Image Detection

Abstract: How much of an image does a detector need to see? Small RGB regions can retain useful evidence of image synthesis even when they reveal little of the full scene. Motivated by single-patch detection, we study patch-wise supervision: a shared backbone classifies explicit crops, each crop receives its own loss, and patch probabilities are averaged only at inference. The procedure requires neither handcrafted residual filtering nor a learned image-level fusion module. Experiments span single-patch selection, multiple generator collections, and four CNN and Transformer backbones. On GenImage, the reported patch-wise variants improve average accuracy over their whole-image counterparts across all four backbones. Comparisons of supervision granularity, source resolution, crop size, and inference coverage further characterize the approach, while post-processing tests and difficult-image evaluation reveal its limitations. The historical experiments include evaluation-based model selection, so their scores are not presented as a uniformly selected leaderboard comparison. Overall, the study identifies explicit local input and patch-level supervision as a simple, useful combination for investigating generalizable AI-generated image detection.

Tue 29 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting whether an image is artificially created can be tricky. This paper shows that looking at small pieces of an image, rather than the whole picture at once, helps identify synthesized images better. The researchers designed a method where a computer analyzes many small parts individually and combines the results only at the end, without needing complex extra steps. Their tests with multiple AI models and architectures showed this approach generally improves accuracy. However, they also found some limits when images are especially challenging.
Open → 2609.37937v1

Weakly supervised method improves detection of ai-edited image regions

Less Supervision, Better Generalization: Weakly Supervised Fake Region Localization in Diffusion-Edited Images

Abstract: Localizing AI-edited regions is essential for interpretable forensic analysis, but remains challenging due to subtle and spatially distributed artifacts that are misaligned with semantic or object boundaries. Existing approaches rely on pixel-level supervision from controlled editing pipelines, which is difficult to scale and can introduce misleading signals: artifacts frequently extend beyond annotated regions, while out-of-mask pixels are treated as authentic. This limits models' ability to capture transferable evidence and generalize across generators and datasets. To address these issues, we propose ReGFLoW, a Reconstruction-Guided Fake Localization framework under Weak supervision, which is the first weakly supervised approach for diffusion-edited fake region localization. ReGFLoW requires only real/fake labels at the image-level and uses diffusion reconstruction errors as dense spatial guidance to inject them into both feature and score spaces. Furthermore, by artifact-centric multiple instance learning, ReGFLoW utilizes localized diffusion evidence without relying on semantic-affinity or boundary-based pseudo-mask priors. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ReGFLoW achieves stronger out-of-domain generalization than fully supervised learning baselines.

Tue 29 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Identifying which parts of an image were altered by AI is important but hard because the changes are often subtle and spread out. The authors designed a new method that doesn't need detailed labels showing exactly which pixels were edited. Instead, their approach learns from just knowing if an image is real or fake and uses differences in image reconstruction to find altered regions. This method generalizes better than older ones that required detailed pixel-level labels.
Open → 2609.36882v1

Training free deepfake detection finds suspicious image areas first

Look Before You Judge: Training-Free Region Mining for Grounded and Explainable Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can explain deepfake verdicts in natural language, but such explanations are not necessarily visually grounded in the visual evidence underlying the prediction. A model may describe plausible artifacts inferred from language priors rather than from image evidence. Existing grounding methods improve visual reliance through decoding or attention interventions, but they generally strengthen grounding over the entire image, making them ill-suited for forensic artifacts that are subtle, spatially localized, and image-dependent. We propose Look Before You Judge, a training-free framework that formulates explainable deepfake detection as a sequential evidence acquisition process. Instead of directly predicting image authenticity from holistic visual reasoning, our framework first identifies image-specific candidate evidence regions by contrasting the MLLM's decoder-to-visual attention between an original image and its Gaussian-blurred counterpart. The identified regions are then inspected individually, and the resulting local evidence is integrated with the global image context before reaching a final verdict. The framework operates without manipulation masks, external forensic models, or parameter updates, making it directly applicable to off-the-shelf MLLMs. Across five open-source MLLMs on TriDF and MMTD-Set, our framework improves detection accuracy by up to 12.8%, reduces CHAIR by up to 33.4% and hallucination rate by up to 21.3%, and outperforms representative training-free decoding and attention methods.

Mon 28 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting fake images called deepfakes can be tricky because the fake parts are often small and hidden. The authors propose a new way that doesn’t require extra training, where their method first spots which small parts of an image might be fake by comparing it to a blurred version. Then, it looks at these parts closely along with the whole image before deciding if it’s fake. This approach works well with existing AI language and vision models and improves accuracy while giving better visual explanations.
Open → 2609.35536v1

ControlTrace improves hidden content recognition in images by recovering control fields

ControlTrace: Recovering Control Fields for Hidden-Content Recognition

Abstract: Spatially conditioned diffusion models can embed words and contours in natural-looking images, but vision-language models (VLMs) may fail to recognize the hidden content. Transformation-based recovery depends on parameter and view selection. To evaluate hidden-content recovery and recognition, we construct FreqBlind, a 6,000-image benchmark spanning contours, real words and non-words across three conditioning strengths. The evaluated transformation-based methods show limited recognition of contour patterns and weakly conditioned hidden content. To address this limitation, we propose ControlTrace to recover the grayscale control field used during generation. An 8.4M-parameter U-Net predicts this field from the carrier image, and a VLM then identifies its content. With Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, ControlTrace achieves 60.2% open-ended contour recognition accuracy across the three conditioning strengths, exceeding the best of the three evaluated prior methods by 26.9 percentage points. On an A100 GPU, the complete pipeline adds only 7.4 ms (5.3%) to direct VLM inference. Recovered fields have lower pixel errors and higher structural similarity than the evaluated transformation views. Across four evaluated VLMs, ControlTrace retains its overall contour recognition advantage. Recognition remains stable under the tested JPEG compression, Gaussian noise and downsampling. These results support control-field recovery for hidden-content recognition in the evaluated setting.

Mon 28 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Sometimes images can hide words or shapes that are hard for AI to recognize. The authors created a tool called ControlTrace that guesses the original control pattern used to make the hidden parts in pictures. This helps vision-language AI models see the hidden content more accurately than before. Their tests show ControlTrace works better and faster than earlier methods, even when images are slightly altered or compressed.
Open → 2609.34807v1

Combining global and local models improves deepfake detection accuracy

DBCF: Dual-Branch Complementary Fusion of Foundation Models for Generalized Deepfake Detection

Abstract: As image generation and editing technologies have progressed substantially, facial forgeries pose significant challenges to privacy and public safety. Due to limited ability to capture forgery cues, existing small-scale forgery detection models often struggle to generalize across various domains and unseen manipulations. To address this limitation, researchers have turned to large-scale foundation models, which can provide richer representations and better generalization. Nevertheless, relying on a single foundation model alone remains insufficient for effective forgery detection. While models like CLIP offer robust global semantic cues, they lack the capacity to capture detailed local facial features. In contrast, DINO excels at capturing local structural features of faces, but provides weaker global semantic context. To fully utilize the synergies among multiple foundation models, we propose a hierarchical multi-granular framework that integrates complementary pretrained representations. Specifically, a Global Context Branch (GCB) based on CLIP captures holistic semantic cues, while a Fine-grained Cue Branch (FCB) built on DINOv3 captures localized structural irregularities. In addition, we design a feature fusion module that enables parameter-efficient adaptation of the frozen foundation backbones by adaptively extracting and integrating complementary features from the two models. By jointly leveraging global context and fine-grained cues, our method learns more comprehensive forgery representations and achieves strong cross-manipulation performance. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the benefit of the proposed design, particularly under cross-dataset and cross-manipulation settings.

Mon 28 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Deepfake videos and images can trick people by showing fake faces or expressions. Existing small models often fail to detect new or different types of fakes well. These authors combine two powerful models: one that understands the whole image’s meaning and another that focuses on fine facial details. Their combined method can better spot fakes across different types and datasets. Testing shows this approach works well even on fake images it hasn’t seen before.
Open → 2609.34720v1

Assemble improves video question answering with explicit evidence tracing

ASSEMBLE: Atomic Skills for Evidence-Grounded Video Reasoning

Abstract: Complex video reasoning often depends on evidence scattered across distant moments, entities, and events, yet a correct answer alone does not reveal whether a model relied on the right parts of the video. We introduce ASSEMBLE, a framework that makes supporting evidence explicit throughout long-video reasoning. ASSEMBLE organizes local observations and cross-clip narratives into timestamped evidence catalogs traceable to the source video. A grounding-aware reader then composes question-specific atomic skills whose structured outputs contain explicit evidence references and support assessments. We use correctness-gated citation alignment as a direct grounding signal: after teacher-supervised fine-tuning, Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) jointly optimizes answer correctness and citation alignment. This produces inspectable intermediate traces while keeping final predictions linked to explicit supporting evidence. Using a 9B reader supervised by a 235B teacher and shared precomputed evidence catalogs, ASSEMBLE achieves 59.2% macro-averaged answer accuracy across three long-video reasoning benchmarks, compared with 58.3% for Gemini-2.5-Pro, while improving macro-averaged overlap-based Grounded accuracy by 6.7%, with gains on all three benchmarks. Ablations further show that, with the same post-trained reader and inference budget, structured skill inference improves Grounded accuracy over free-form reasoning. Together, these results show that explicit evidence grounding can be integrated directly into long-video reasoning without sacrificing answer accuracy.

Sat 26 SeptMultimedia
The gist
Answering questions about long videos is hard because the right information is spread out across many parts of the video. The authors created ASSEMBLE, a method that tracks and shows exactly which clips and moments support the answers it gives. This makes it easier to check if the reasoning is based on the correct video parts. Their approach also improves accuracy on several video reasoning tests without losing performance compared to other large models.
Open → 2609.32466v1

Two methods control false alerts when screening AI text inside documents

Two Conformal Constructions for Adaptive Within-Document AI-Text Screening

Abstract: We study false-alert control when screening for text generated by artificial intelligence (AI). The screening procedure selects document prefixes and detectors from observed evidence and may stop before exhausting its inspection budget. We give two finite-sample constructions under document-level exchangeability between human calibration documents and a new null document, with no restriction on dependence among tokens within a document. Construction A registers a finite family of prefix-detector scores and allocates a false-alert budget across their conformal ranks. A union bound protects any executed subset of that family. Construction B calibrates the complete-path maximum of a development-fixed adaptive policy. Each partial-path maximum is bounded by the complete maximum, so a terminal conformal rank protects early stopping without splitting the error budget. We prove marginal control of any false alert across the permitted inspection path and derive necessary calibration counts for rejection. We also state oracle testing, distribution-shift, and independent-audit bounds with their additional assumptions. Both constructions protect stopping within their specified scope; neither proof constructs an e-process or justifies multiplying conformal ranks. Detection power and computational savings remain questions for empirical evaluation.

Fri 25 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Detecting text generated by AI inside documents can raise false alarms, wasting effort. The authors propose two ways to carefully decide when to stop checking parts of a document to control false alerts, even if tokens inside the document depend on each other. They prove that their methods keep false alarms under control while allowing early stopping, but testing their accuracy and speed in practice is still needed.
Open → 2609.31547v1

AI image generator swaps caught by forensic acceptance region tests

FARE: Forensic Acceptance Region Estimation for Catching Bait-and-Switch Image Generators

Abstract: Modern AI image generators are increasingly deployed as opaque APIs, where customers can query the deployed service, but cannot inspect model weights or architecture. This creates a practical challenge: a provider may pass governance certification with one generator and later silently switch to a cheaper and lower-quality one for deployment, compromising public trust or even safety in high-stakes domains. We study integrity auditing at deployment time and propose FARE (Forensic Acceptance Region Estimation). A certified generator is enrolled by training FARE on images sampled from that generator. After deployment, FARE can determine whether a generated image is consistent with the enrolled generator---using only that image. FARE's features are based on image generator-specific artifacts that have been proposed for forensic applications. FARE amplifies these features during training by finding hard samples that tighten the acceptance region and increase sensitivity to subtle changes in the certified generator. Across generator swaps, including substitutions with similar model versions and model variants, FARE is effective at detecting swaps, consistently outperforming existing baselines at strict operating points, and remains effective under the exact-model and decision-only attacks evaluated in this work.

Fri 25 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceCryptography and Security
The gist
AI services that create images often hide their inner workings, letting companies secretly swap a trusted model for a cheaper one. This can reduce quality or trust in important situations. The authors created FARE, a tool that learns the unique patterns of a certified image generator by training on its pictures. Later, FARE checks if new images really come from the certified model, catching hidden swaps by spotting subtle differences. This helps keep AI image services honest and reliable.
Open → 2609.30982v1

Entropy guided method improves AI generated image detection accuracy

EIB-Net: Entropy-Guided Information Bottleneck for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection

Abstract: The proliferation of photorealistic AI-generated images demands robust detection methods that generalize across diverse generative models. While existing approaches target manipulation-based forgeries with local artifacts, generation-based images (e.g., from diffusion models) lack such traces, posing a fundamental challenge. We observe that generative models prioritize global semantics at the expense of local texture fidelity, making low-texture regions key indicators of synthetic origin. To exploit this, we propose EIB-Net, an Entropy-guided Information Bottleneck Network. EIB-Net introduces a novel Image Entropy (IE) metric to automatically select the most informative (lowest-entropy) patch, then processes it with a Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB) to learn compact, generalizable features. Extensive experiments on DIFF, DiffusionForensics, and GenImage benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art performance: EIB-Net achieves 85.7\% accuracy using only 2\% of training data, outperforming full-image baselines by over 15\%, and maintains robust cross-generator generalization (83.5\% average accuracy on GenImage). Furthermore, our entropy-guided patch selection (EGPL) consistently enhances diverse backbones (CNNs and Transformers), proving its practical value for data-efficient detection.

Thu 24 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Detecting images made by artificial intelligence is hard because they often don’t have obvious fake parts. The authors found that AI images usually have smooth or less detailed areas that can help spot them. They created a technique called EIB-Net that picks out these smooth parts using a new measurement and focuses on them to learn better clues for detection. Their method works well even with little training data and works on images from different AI sources.
Open → 2609.29064v1

Deepfake detectors improve accuracy using new visual model and experts

Unifying Semantic Priors and High-Frequency Traces: Enhancing V-JEPA with Mixture-of-Experts for Robust Synthetic Image Forensics

Abstract: The unchecked proliferation of manipulated images on social media platforms has increased the spread of misinformation, posing a severe threat to public trust and information integrity. Modern deepfake detectors typically rely on Vision Transformers (ViTs) to capture the low-level inconsistencies that characterize fully synthetic or locally tampered images. However, the global understanding of such foundation models is not enough to discriminate alone between real and fake multimedia content, especially in challenging scenarios where images are compressed or transmitted through social media. In this paper we pioneer the application of Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) models to deepfake detection, taking advantage of the generalized representation of visual reality that such World Models have exhibited. We hypothesize, and empirically demonstrate, that the intrinsic world understanding of JEPA models can be used as a strong prior for a deepfake detector. To fully exploit JEPA capabilities, we propose MoE-JEPA, a dual-stream architecture for deepfake detection. By enhancing a V-JEPA 2 backbone with a Residual Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) mechanism, along with a noise stream branch, our model dynamically internalizes forensic knowledge. Furthermore, a Gated Attention Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) module is employed to ensure precise spatial semantic understanding. Evaluated on the SID-Set benchmark, comprising 300K AI-generated, tampered and authentic images, MoE-JEPA establishes a new state-of-the-art with an accuracy of 95.54%, successfully outperforming vastly larger models.

Tue 15 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Fakes images on social media can spread false information, so detecting them is important. The paper shows that a type of AI model called JEPA helps recognize real versus fake images better by understanding how the world typically looks. The authors built a new system, MoE-JEPA, which uses multiple expert parts and attention techniques to better spot fake details, even in tricky cases like compressed images. Their method tested on a large benchmark and beat bigger existing models in accuracy.
Open → 2609.16778v1

WAVIE improves deepfake detection by combining spatial and frequency cues

Lightweight Generalized DeepFake Face Detection with WAVIE: Wavelet Augmented Vision Intermediate Embeddings

Abstract: Deepfake detection systems often exhibit significant performance degradation when deployed on unseen manipulation methods, limiting their reliability in real-world multimedia environments. This lack of generalization poses critical challenges for misinformation mitigation, digital forensics, and human-centric AI systems. Existing detectors perform well on the forgery methods they are trained on, but their accuracy drops sharply on unseen pipelines. To bridge this generalization gap, we propose WAVIE (Wavelet Augmented Vision Intermediate Embeddings), an end-to-end architecture that combines complementary spatial and frequency cues on top of a frozen CLIP backbone. WAVIE projects intermediate transformer embeddings through a lightweight learnable module, applies a three-level Daubechies-6 (db6) discrete wavelet transform (DWT), refines the low-frequency branch while preserving the high-frequency branch, reconstructs the feature via inverse DWT, and performs classification. Trained only on FaceForensics++, WAVIE achieves AUROC = 0.852 on Celeb-DF-v1, 0.852 on Celeb-DF-v2 and 0.831 on WildDeepFake (WDF) at the frame level, outperforming several state-of-the-art generalization baselines. Extensive ablation studies confirm the importance of both the wavelet module and the intermediate-feature aggregation for cross-dataset performance, highlighting the necessity of jointly leveraging spatial and frequency domains. These results position WAVIE as a strong baseline for deepfake detection in the wild.

Sun 13 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Detecting fake videos called deepfakes is hard because systems often fail when they see new types of fakes they weren’t trained on. The authors present WAVIE, a new method that looks at video images using both their visual details and hidden frequency patterns. By using a special wavelet transformation on features extracted from a powerful image model, WAVIE better spots fake videos it hasn’t seen before. It works well on several challenging test sets, showing promise for more reliable deepfake detection.
Open → 2609.14437v1