Papers for

digital content managers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

ERCLIP improves long caption image text retrieval with small data

ERCLIP: Small-Data Adaptation of CLIP for Free-Length Image-Text Retrieval

Abstract: CLIP's 77-token text encoder truncates detailed image descriptions. We present ERCLIP, a small-data adaptation of CLIP for long-caption image--text retrieval. During training, a long caption is split into sentences that the CLIP text encoder encodes independently; the sentence embeddings are fused by mean pooling or a gated residual Transformer scorer and receive their own contrastive loss. At inference ERCLIP is an unmodified CLIP dual encoder: test captions are still read through the 77-token window, and only training sees the full caption. We find that this fine-tuning erodes CLIP's zero-shot classification, most when the fusion output is not a combination of CLIP embeddings, and add a frozen-CLIP preservation loss on the image and short-caption embeddings. With 20k pairs and one epoch, ERCLIP improves long-caption R@1 over CLIP by 6.5--11.2 points, closing 62--77% of the gap to LongCLIP with 2% of its long captions. Preservation recovers 1.5--2.1 ImageNet zero-shot points (30--42% of the loss) and adds up to 2.4 points of COCO image-to-text R@1, at no inference cost.

Wed 21 OctInformation Retrieval
The gist
Standard CLIP models can only read short parts of image descriptions, missing details from longer captions. The authors introduce ERCLIP, a way to train CLIP using small datasets of long captions by splitting captions into sentences during training only. This method improves matching images with longer text descriptions without changing how the model works during use. They also add a technique to keep the original model's ability to recognize images without hurting this improvement.
Open → 2610.29939v1

Language model agents improve search by customizing their interfaces

Let Agents Design How They Search: Automatic Interface Optimization for Agentic Search

Abstract: Agentic search depends on the interface through which a language-model agent accesses and explores a corpus. Existing interface designs are fixed by hand and applied unchanged to every corpus, although effective designs may depend on the corpus. We introduce SearchWeaver, a framework for automatic search interface optimization guided by downstream search performance. A proposer uses execution trajectories and task rewards to jointly revise corpus artifacts, executable tools, and usage instructions. This pro cess optimizes what information is prepared in advance, which operations tools perform, and which decisions remain with the search agent. With GPT-5.4-nano, the optimized interfaces improve answer accuracy from 71.6% to 78.4% on BrowseComp-Plus and average nDCG@10 from 45.7 to 55.0 across four BRIGHT subsets over Direct Corpus Interaction. These findings highlight the value of jointly optimizing corpus artifacts, executable tools, and usage instructions to develop effective search interfaces.

Wed 21 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Searching information with AI assistants depends a lot on how they interact with the data they explore. The authors developed a system called SearchWeaver that lets the AI change and improve its own search tools and instructions, making searches more accurate and useful. This approach means the AI figures out the best way to use the data and tools for each specific collection of information. Tests showed that this method improved the quality of search answers and ranking compared to usual ways. This shows that letting AI tailor its search setup improves its performance.
Open → 2610.29250v1

Image restoration agent predicts results before fixing photos

Look Before You Restore: Learning to Predict Before Acting for Agentic Image Restoration

Abstract: Agents for mixed-degradation image restoration typically learn what a tool does to an image only after running it: failed calls waste computation and harmful outputs go unnoticed until too late. We propose PreActIR, an agentic restoration framework that predicts tool consequences before execution. For each candidate tool, a tool-conditioned world model forecasts changes in residual degradation, image quality, and fidelity, together with the risk of harm and the uncertainty of the prediction. The agent executes the top-ranked candidate, and an independent verifier commits or rolls back its output before the agent replans from the observed state. PreActIR also audits whether performance is limited by the selector or by the candidate space, and studies targeted tool adaptation as a controlled way to expand that space. In a controlled evaluation that fixes the candidate pool, verifier, and budget and employs reference-annotated degradation states, PreActIR uses 42.5% fewer real tool calls and 63.4% fewer rejected calls than reactive, execute-then-evaluate trial and error, while improving Y-PSNR by 0.92 dB.

Wed 14 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Images can get damaged in different ways, and fixing them often involves trying many tools without knowing if they will help. The authors built a system called PreActIR that guesses how well each tool will work before actually using it, which saves time and prevents making photos worse. It also checks its own fixes with a verifier that decides to keep or undo the change. This method uses fewer tries and avoids bad corrections, leading to better restored images.
Open → 2610.20384v1

Agents use receipts to clean knowledge graphs more accurately

Keep Your Receipts: Trustworthy Cleanup of Agent-Built Knowledge Graphs

Abstract: Agents build knowledge graphs as memory, and building them has become easy. Maintaining them has not. When a source is retracted, overruled, or erased, everything built on top of it (entity merges, entailed edges, community summaries) must be re-examined, and the maintainer must choose between deleting too much and too little. Deployed pipelines delete only the directly extracted facts: on our corpus that reduces contaminated queries from 32.2% to 28.0% under a real retraction and changes nothing under predicate revocation. Rebuilding is no repair for a constructor that samples: two builds of the same 300-document corpus differ in 29,475 artifacts, five times the 6,248 that removing the 61 retracted documents changes. PolyGraph instead asks the constructor for receipts: for every artifact, alternative bundles of source evidence, each claimed sufficient on its own, emitted in the call that creates it. Cleanup is then set arithmetic over the receipts, with no model calls. Because receipts are the model's own self-report, a re-derivation audit checks them by deleting the cited evidence and testing whether the constructor still produces the artifact. The audit finds that a receipt is trustworthy when it is shaped like the claim it backs. Merge receipts, each backing one narrow claim, agree with re-derivation 68% and 85% of the time. Summary receipts, elicited per sentence but stored as one flat list for the whole text, are wrong about two thirds of the time, almost always by keeping dead content. One receipt per sentence instead is 100% and 88% faithful and lets cleanup keep 33 of 35 touched summaries. The result holds under a second oracle model, a claim-blind prompt, ten further deletions, a second domain and a second constructor. Distrusting the summary layer cuts contaminated queries to 0.4% and 0.8% at 99.8 to 100% of the recall a perfect maintainer would return.

Tue 13 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Knowledge graphs are like memory maps created by AI agents to store facts, but when some source facts are removed or corrected, it’s hard to clean up everything that depends on them without losing too much or too little information. The authors found that just deleting the directly extracted facts doesn’t fix many errors, and rebuilding the graph can create big differences on its own. Their new method, called PolyGraph, asks the agent to keep ‘receipts’—proof of every fact’s evidence—so when sources change, the system checks those receipts and cleans the graph more accurately without extra expensive calls. This approach greatly reduces errors from outdated information while keeping most of the valid facts intact.
Open → 2610.17719v1

Semantic views reduce costly ai model calls while ensuring accuracy

Semantic Views: Certified Reuse of LLM Labels Across Semantic Queries

Abstract: Semantic query engines evaluate natural-language filters with a large language model, and every evaluation is a costly oracle call. Optimizers that reduce these calls face a dilemma: cascades that trust a cheap proxy miss their precision and recall targets on many queries, methods with finite-sample guarantees save little, and all of them discard the oracle's labels when the query ends. We present SemViews, a certified semantic filter that orders tuples by signals that cost no oracle calls (the labels that earlier queries left behind as semantic views, a local embedding, and a helper model's score), refines that order with labels it must pay for anyway, and certifies its answer with fresh stratified oracle samples. The answer meets user precision and recall targets with probability at least $1-δ$ for every workload and every catalog, so a stale or misleading view can cost oracle calls but never accuracy. On four workloads replayed against 725,000 recorded oracle labels, SemViews meets both targets on 99.63% of queries and saves 28%-45% of the oracle calls, whereas the only prior method in our study with the same guarantee needs 1.32x-1.71x as many calls. When a question returns in different words, views cut its calls by a further 27%-36%, with both targets met on at least 99.8% of such queries; similarity caches and entailment-based reuse meet them on only 17%-47%.

Thu 8 OctDatabasesArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Answering questions using large language models is expensive because each question requires the model to work hard. The authors introduce SemViews, a system that smartly reuses answers from earlier questions to save these costly model calls without losing accuracy. It orders possible answers based on cheaper signals from previous queries and only confirms uncertain cases with the expensive model. Tests show SemViews saves lots of these costly checks while still being reliable almost all the time.
Open → 2610.12768v1