Papers for

digital assistants teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Multi-agent retrieval method reduces unsupported claims in language models

Hallucination-Aware Multi-Agent RAG via Internal Attention Rewards

Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds language models in retrieved evidence, but its outputs often contain claims unsupported by that evidence. Recent multi-agent RAG systems decompose the pipeline into cooperative decisions, yet they typically optimize all agents under a shared task reward such as EM or F1, which measures answer overlap rather than faithfulness to evidence. We propose a hallucination-aware multi-agent RAG framework that combines the task reward with an internal hallucination-risk signal computed from the generator's attention-head norms. Three role-specific LoRA adapters, a query planner, an evidence selector, and an answer generator, share a frozen backbone. A lightweight critic is trained once on TruthfulQA truthful/false pairs and then kept frozen, providing a complementary risk score that is added to the shared reward during cooperative PPO training. Across three backbones (Qwen3-8B, Llama3-8B, Llama2-13B) and three benchmarks (RAGTruth, HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA), our method improves task performance and reduces hallucination rates over the strongest multi-agent baseline. Ablations and critic diagnostics show that the TruthfulQA-calibrated signal provides useful reward shaping that transfers across RAG tasks.

Mon 26 OctInformation Retrieval
The gist
Language models sometimes make up facts not supported by their sources when answering questions. The authors introduce a system where multiple agents work together and get feedback not only on getting the right answer, but also on whether the answer sticks to the evidence. They use a special attention-based signal and a trained critic to reward truthful answers. Their method improves accuracy and reduces made-up content across several language model types and question benchmarks.
Open → 2610.35056v1

Search technique decides when web evidence is enough for answers

Knowing When the Evidence Is Enough: Requirement-Directed Search with Horn-Closure Certificates

Abstract: After each Web search, a search-augmented model must decide whether its evidence suffices: answer, search again, or abstain. Prevailing systems leave this to holistic model judgement, which can accept a context naming every entity yet lacking one required fact. We instead make sufficiency structural: a per-query requirement hypergraph states which facts jointly yield another fact. This raises two challenges: deriving requirements from the question alone, and linking each requirement to passages about the right entity. Certify therefore decomposes the question, searches per requirement, and accepts links only after entity checks. Horn closure over the links yields a certificate, the minimal sufficient passages and their derivation, or an abstention naming open requirements. Given correct retrieval, requirements and links, the decision is sound, and complete up to the entity check. Pooled over three corpora with unanswerable twins, Certify decides significantly more accurately than search agents, graph retrieval and sufficiency judges in default configurations. On the same evidence, it matches a proprietary model's sufficiency label without an additional model call. Over 21M Wikipedia passages, entity checks add 4 to 13 points of decision accuracy where gold evidence exists. Finally, answers from its certificate are 80% correct, against 57% from all retrieved passages.

Mon 26 OctInformation RetrievalArtificial IntelligenceComputation and Language
The gist
When a search engine tries to answer questions from the web, it needs to know if it has found enough information, or if it should keep looking. The authors created a method called Certify that breaks down a question into smaller fact-checks and uses a structured approach to find and verify the right pieces of information. This method can confidently decide if the search has enough proof to answer or if more searching is needed, improving accuracy and reliability compared to other approaches.
Open → 2610.34684v1

Latent schema reasoning improves question answering over knowledge bases

Schema-Anchored Latent Reasoning for Semantic Parsing-Based Knowledge Base Question Answering

Abstract: Semantic parsing (SP)-based knowledge base question answering aims to answer natural language questions by generating executable logical forms (LFs) over knowledge bases (KBs). When applying Large Language Models (LLMs) to this task, a key challenge over large, heterogeneous KBs is selecting question-related schema elements (i.e., relations and classes) and composing them into complex LFs. Recent LLM-based methods often make early discrete commitments to schema elements during intermediate reasoning, allowing incorrect intermediate schema decisions to propagate and finally result in incorrect LFs. To overcome this limitation, we propose SALR, a schema-anchored latent reasoning method for LF construction. It performs multi-step reasoning by generating continuous thoughts in the model's hidden states, thereby delaying the explicit commitment to LF decisions. To ground this latent reasoning process in the corresponding KB schema, SALR aligns continuous thoughts with a codebook of KB schema elements through an alignment objective supervised by schema traces deterministically derived from gold LFs. It then incorporates the aligned schema codes into inputs for subsequent reasoning steps. This schema-mediated feedback guides LF generation without requiring the model to emit an explicit textual reasoning trajectory. Experiments on GrailQA and WebQSP show that SALR achieves consistent overall gains over strong baselines. Notably, on compositional questions from GrailQA, SALR outperforms TIARA, a strong SP-based baseline, by 2.86 F1 points. Further analyses show that schema-mediated feedback affects LF generation and that schema information is recoverable from the latent states.

Thu 17 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Answering complex questions using large knowledge bases requires understanding which parts of the data to look at and how to combine them. The authors introduce a method called SALR that lets a language model think through its reasoning steps in a hidden, flexible way, delaying final decisions until more information is considered. SALR links these hidden thoughts to parts of the knowledge base to help guide the final answer without forcing explicit step-by-step explanations. Their tests show this approach helps the model produce more accurate answers, especially for complicated questions.
Open → 2609.20398v1

PunGraph improves pun understanding using sound and meaning networks

PunGraph: Retrieval-Enhanced Phonetic-Semantic Graph Reasoning for Pun Understanding

Abstract: Puns are a challenging form of figurative language that exploit phonetic similarity and semantic ambiguity to convey multiple meanings. Although large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong language understanding capabilities, they still struggle with pun reasoning due to limited phonetic modeling and uncontrolled end-to-end generation. We propose \textbf{PunGraph}, a retrieval-enhanced knowledge graph framework for pun understanding. PunGraph constructs a phonetic-semantic lexical graph using the Unisyn phonetic dictionary, IPA and G2P representations, and WordNet definitions, and retrieves candidate words or senses to constrain LLM reasoning within a structured candidate space. We further introduce \textbf{WebPun}, a new large-scale dataset containing 5,730 annotated heterographic and homographic puns. Experiments on SemEval-2017 and WebPun show that PunGraph consistently improves the performance of small-scale LLMs and achieves competitive results against strong proprietary models. Further analysis shows that retrieval-guided phonetic and semantic constraints effectively reduce common reasoning errors in pun interpretation, highlighting the benefits of integrating structured knowledge with LLMs. We release our code and dataset at https://github.com/ysu132/PunGraph.

Tue 15 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Puns are tricky jokes that play on words sounding alike but having different meanings. The authors create PunGraph, a system that builds networks connecting words by how they sound and what they mean to help computers understand puns better. They also introduce a big new dataset of puns to test their method. Their approach helps smaller language models make fewer mistakes when figuring out puns and performs well compared to advanced models. This shows combining structured knowledge about sounds and meanings with language models can improve pun interpretation.
Open → 2609.16557v1

Individual search histories help predict personal knowledge patterns

Individual Text Corpora Predict User-Specific Knowledge: Benchmarks of Individualized Knowledge Simulation

Abstract: This study examines whether individual text corpora (ICs) from search histories can be used to simulate individual knowledge. We collected ICs from 316 adults, who answered 36 multiple-choice knowledge items, and compared several large language models (LLMs) on this task, of which only Qwen3-1.7B proved viable. After task-specific fine-tuning via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Qwen3-1.7B outperformed both participants and a representative German norm sample on publicly available items. On non-public questions, however, the LLM performed worse than our participants, suggesting possible training data contamination for the public questions. When integrating ICs into retrieval-augmented generation to predict individual responses, LLM-participant Match accuracies significantly exceeded chance, which demonstrates a detectable individual knowledge signal. The probabilities assigned to the participants' answers were, however, low and far below the probability of correct answers, indicating poor calibration toward individual response patterns. Knowledge-gap prediction was sub-optimal, though it improved for corpora exceeding five million tokens. We discuss our entropy based evaluation benchmarks as calibration indices for individualized knowledge simulation.

Tue 8 SeptInformation Retrieval
The gist
People leave clues about what they know in the words they search and read online. This study checked if large language models (LLMs) can guess people's knowledge using those clues. They found that one specific LLM could do better than people on some standard questions but struggled on new ones. Using the personal text collections to help the LLM guess individual answers worked better than random guessing, but the predictions were not very confident or perfectly accurate. The authors also created ways to measure how well these guesses match actual knowledge.
Open → 2609.08532v1

Dense retrievers improved by tracing query expansion with sparse features

Tracing Query Expansion Effects through Sparse Autoencoder Features

Abstract: Query expansion (QE) is a critical technique in information retrieval that enriches underspecified queries with additional textual context. However, its effect is often unreliable in modern dense retrieval, especially for strong off-the-shelf retrievers without retraining. Existing studies mainly examine expansion quality, semantic drift, or retrieval outcomes, but rarely explain how QE changes dense retrievers internally. In this work, we trace QE effects through sparse autoencoder (SAE) features. Using paired original and expanded queries, we decompose layer-wise retriever representations into sparse latent activations, identify QE-related latents from expansion-induced activation shifts, and interpret them with natural-language descriptions and retrieval cases. Our analysis shows that effective QE induces layer-concentrated changes in sparse latents aligned with retrieval intent and entity attributes, rather than only perturbing final query embeddings. SAE-based activation steering further validates these latents improve retrieval more consistently than random interventions or vanilla QE across four benchmarks, suggesting that SAEs can explain QE effects and offer a lightweight option for precise retrieval behavior modulation without query rewriting or retriever fine-tuning.

Mon 7 SeptInformation Retrieval
The gist
Sometimes search queries are too simple, and adding extra context helps find better results. This paper looks inside how modern search systems change when queries are expanded by showing specific parts of their computations called sparse autoencoder features. The authors found that good query expansions cause meaningful changes in certain layers of the system linked to what the searcher wants and named things. They also show a way to improve search results by adjusting these features directly, without changing the query or retraining the system.
Open → 2609.06968v1