Papers for

data storage architects

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Exact bounds found for reconstructing sequences after deletions

On Sequence Reconstruction Problem for q-ary Deletion Channels

Abstract: The sequence reconstruction problem for $q$-ary deletion channels, introduced by Levenshtein in 2001, concerns the minimum number of channels required to uniquely recover a transmitted sequence when each channel introduces exactly $t$ deletions. Combinatorially, it is equivalent to determining $N_q(n,d,t)$, the maximum intersection size of two $t$-deletion balls with centers at Levenshtein distance at least $d$, for $q$-ary sequences of length $n$ over the alphabet \(Σ_q=\{0,1,\dots,q-1\}\). Levenshtein solved the uncoded case $N_q(n,1,t)$ for all $n\ge t$; subsequently, Gabrys and Yaakobi determined $N_2(n,2,t)$, and Wang et al. extended the result to $N_3(n,2,t)$. In this paper, we study the problem for \(q\)-ary sequences under minimum Levenshtein distance \(d=2\) with channels that introduce exactly \(t\) deletions. We determine the exact value of \(N_q(n,2,t)\) for all \(t\ge 2, q\geq 4\), and for sufficiently large \(n\), and construct explicit pairs of sequences attaining the maximum intersection. Furthermore, for each $q\ge3$, we characterize all extremal sequence pairs. In particular, if the intersection size matches the first two terms of \(N_q(n,2,t)\), then the two center sequences must contain, at the same positions, length-5 blocks of the forms \((a,b,c,a,b)\) and \((b,a,c,b,a)\) for some distinct \(a,b,c\inΣ_q\); for \(t\ge q+2\), the exact maximum \(N_q(n,2,t)\) is attained precisely by \(2q!\) unordered pairs of sequences with a specific block structure. Asymptotically, we prove that for \(q\ge 4\) and \(t\ge 2\), \[ N_q(n,2,t)=\frac{6}{(t-2)!}n^{t-2}-\frac{3t+13}{(t-3)!}n^{t-3}+\frac{3t^2+25t+64}{4(t-4)!}n^{t-4}+O(n^{t-5}). \] Moreover, \(N_q(n,2,t)\) and \(N_{q-1}(n,2,t)\) share their first \(q-1\) terms, and for \(t\ge q\) the coefficient of \(n^{t-q}\) in their difference is \(\frac{6t-6q+5}{(t-q)!}\).

Tue 15 SeptInformation Theory
The gist
This paper looks at how to perfectly recover messages that have had some pieces deleted, a problem important in communication and data storage. The authors find exact formulas for the hardest cases when sequences are made from alphabets with four or more symbols and exactly two differences are present. They also describe the special patterns sequences must have to be among these hardest cases. These results refine previous partial answers and help understand the limits of recovering deleted data.
Open 2609.16837v1

Generalized packing radii are bounded by covering radii in coding theory

On the Generalized Packing and Covering Radii of Codes

Abstract: The minimum distance and the covering radius are two fundamental properties of the code. Both have been extended: the former to the generalized Hamming weights hierarchy, and the latter to the generalized covering radii hierarchy. In both cases, the lowest level of the hierarchies corresponds to the classical minimum distance and covering radius, respectively. From a geometric point of view, the minimum distance of the code determines the packing radius, which is upper bounded by the covering radius. It was conjectured this relation extends to all other orders of the hierarchy, namely, that the generalized packing radii are upper bounded by the generalized covering radii of the same order. In this paper we prove this conjecture is true for the second order radii. We also prove the conjecture holds for all orders when the code rate is at most $3/5$. Finally, we show that for any code rate in $(0,1)$, for all sufficiently long codes the conjecture holds for all orders.

Sun 13 SeptInformation Theory
The gist
In coding, two important measurements describe how codes protect information: how far apart code points are (packing) and how well the code covers all possibilities (covering). Researchers extended these ideas into more detailed levels called generalized radii. It was unclear if the relationship between packing and covering seen at the basic level holds at higher levels. The authors proved this relationship is true for the second level and for all levels under certain conditions on code size and length.
Open 2609.14477v1