Papers for
data security teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Dictator functions hold most information under binary noise
Dictators are most informative
Abstract: We prove the Courtade-Kumar conjecture: among all Boolean functions $f\colon \{-1,1\}^n\to\{-1,1\}$, a dictator retains the most information about a uniformly random input observed through independent binary noise.
ECG biometric signals hold identity under exercise and time changes
Learning Cardiac Features: ECG Biometrics Across Time and~Exercise
Abstract: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) carry subject-specific patterns enabling reliable individual discrimination, forming the basis of ECG biometrics. Beyond authentication, this paradigm holds significant potential to secure sensitive cardiac data and to serve as a pretext task in self-supervised learning. Yet, most studies remain confined to singlesession, resting data, leaving robustness to temporal and physiological variations largely untested. We address this gap by evaluating ECG biometrics under realistic conditions involving exercise-induced stress and cross-session variability. A Siamese ResNet with late multi-lead fusion strategy is trained on a large ECG dataset extracted from cardiopulmonary exercise tests and evaluated with a exercise-and time-aware protocol, as well as on public benchmarks. This first extensive assessment of ECG biometrics under combined physiological and temporal variability achieves an intra-session rest-to-peak EER of 1.7% and stateof-the-art 3.9% on the CYBHi dataset. Findings support the presence of an intrinsic cardiac signature resilient to physiological and temporal drift.
Auditing real privacy risks in federated synthetic data sharing
Canaries in the Bank: Auditing User-Level Privacy in Private Evolution
Abstract: Private Evolution (PE) generates high-fidelity synthetic data in federated settings without exposing users' raw data. It aggregates clipped user votes over a shared candidate bank into a differentially private histogram, with noise calibrated to the worst-case user contribution. However, it is unclear whether an adversary can realize this worst-case privacy loss while following the PE protocol. We introduce a protocol-aware empirical audit in which the server commits to a single shared candidate bank and replaces roughly 1% of its entries with probes derived from a known, non-private canary. We evaluate eight attacks, including an unchanged-bank baseline, exact copies, plausible paraphrases, and high-entropy synthetic nonces. Experiments on Yelp and Sentiment140 show that natural-text attacks remain substantially below the theoretical DP bound, while nonce-based attacks yield considerably stronger bounds and come closest to the mechanism's privacy ceiling. These results quantify the gap between formal worst-case privacy and leakage achievable through protocol-valid candidate-bank manipulation.
Ensembling algorithms improve stability against data changes
Algorithmic stability via ensembling
Abstract: Algorithmic stability refers to the property of an algorithm being insensitive to perturbations of the input data, where the type of perturbation may vary depending on the setting. In this work, we develop a general framework to quantify the extent to which any ensembling strategy defined via averaging can yield stability guarantees for any type of data perturbation. Our main theoretical result is a guarantee on the stability of this ensembled algorithm, given in terms of the norm of a certain covariance operator that describes the ensembling process. We show how our general framework yields interpretable and intuitive insights in several examples of perturbations of practical interest, and provides much sharper guarantees than those obtained from privacy considerations.