Papers for

data governance officers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Data hospital workflow makes research data quality easier to review

The Data Hospital: A Workflow-Based Concept for Explainable Research Data Quality Assistance

Abstract: Research data quality is multidimensional and purpose-dependent: it emerges from the interplay of data, intended use, contextual knowledge, documentation, intervention decisions, and traceability. This concept paper presents the Data Hospital, a human-in-the-loop control and interaction model for research data quality. Using a hospital metaphor, datasets are admitted, contextualized, assessed, reviewed in specialized stations, modified only through approved interventions, validated, documented, and made replayable where interventions are sufficiently specified. The concept combines deterministic profiling and inspectable evidence with optional evidence-bound explanation by Dr. Data and explicit user decisions. Preserved Raw Data and controlled working states separate observation from intervention. The contribution is not a new cleaning or imputation algorithm, but a ten-stage workflow that makes assessability, uncertainty, intervention authority, provenance, and process reproducibility visible. The prototype is an implementation-backed demonstrator rather than a released research artifact and illustrates selected parts of the concept through representational standardization, imputation, Patient File documentation, and replay. The paper concludes with a staged agenda for subsequent technical and user-centered evaluation.

Thu 17 SeptHuman-Computer Interaction
The gist
Data quality in research depends on many factors like the data itself, how it's used, and the decisions made about it. The authors propose a system called the Data Hospital, which treats datasets like patients going through different stages of review and treatment to improve quality. This approach keeps track of every change and decision, making it easier to assess and explain the data quality. The authors show a prototype illustrating some parts of this workflow and suggest steps for future evaluation.
Open 2609.20782v1