Papers for

data analytics teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Impute missing mixed data accurately with native diffusion models

Impute-EM: Native Mixed-State Diffusion Models for Heterogeneous Data Imputation

Abstract: Missing values are ubiquitous in heterogeneous data mining, where numerical, categorical, and binary variables often coexist. Many imputation methods, especially diffusion-based ones, treat discrete variables through continuous surrogates such as one-hot relaxations rather than modeling them natively. This creates a mismatch between the model state space and the mixed discrete and continuous structure of the data. We propose Impute-EM, an Expectation Maximization style framework that alternates between imputing missing entries with the current model and refitting a diffusion backbone on completed data. We instantiate Impute-EM with native mixed-state diffusion backbones for heterogeneous data, combining Gaussian and masked categorical components without one-hot relaxations. In exact settings, we characterize the update and show that the observed mask-indexed marginals match the targets at the limit, while making explicit that the full data distribution is generally non-identifiable from incomplete observations alone. Empirically, Impute-EM delivers the best distributional fidelity on mixed-type tabular imputation, on which downstream modeling relies, with text imputation serving as a controlled validation of the native discrete backbone.

Mon 14 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Missing data is a common problem when working with datasets that mix numbers, categories, and yes-or-no answers. Many current methods try to handle categories by turning them into continuous approximations, which doesn’t perfectly match the true nature of the data. The authors introduce Impute-EM, a new approach that directly models both continuous and discrete data types without simplifying categories. This method improves the accuracy of filling in missing values, leading to better downstream analyses that rely on complete data.
Open 2609.15284v1

Explainability assistant improves energy model understanding with conversation

Explainability Assistant: A Conversational XAI Interface for Interpreting Energy Consumption Models

Abstract: Energy consumption forecasting relies on increasingly complex machine learning (ML) models, such as Genetic Programming-based symbolic regressors, whose predictions can be difficult for facility managers and building operators to interpret. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques address this opacity, but traditional XAI dashboards require substantial technical expertise and provide limited flexibility for dynamic, context-aware inquiry. Conversational XAI systems offer a promising alternative; however, previous approaches, such as TalkToModel, were constrained by rigid custom grammars and achieved only 76.8% intent-parsing accuracy. This paper introduces the Explainability Assistant, an open-source conversational XAI system that leverages the function-calling capabilities of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) to overcome these limitations. The system achieves 94% intent-parsing accuracy, supports flexible natural language interaction, and adapts to different ML problem types without task-specific fine-tuning. We present the system's architecture and report results from a comparative evaluation conducted with energy domain specialists, contrasting the Explainability Assistant with a traditional XAI dashboard. The evaluation suggests improved usability and consistent task accuracy, with all experts unanimously preferring the conversational interface for practical use.

Thu 10 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Energy forecasting models can be hard to understand for people who manage buildings. The authors created a conversational assistant that helps users ask questions in natural language and get clear explanations about these models. Unlike older systems with limited ways to ask questions, this assistant uses advanced language tools to better understand user intent and works well without extra training. Experts testing the system preferred it over traditional dashboards for ease of use and accuracy.
Open 2609.11860v1

Multimodal question answering moves toward unified language models

Evolution of Multimodal Question Answering: From Modality-Adaptive Extraction to Unified Language Representation

Abstract: The rapid growth of multimodal data has intensified the need for question answering (QA) systems capable of reasoning across heterogeneous sources such as text, tables, and images. In this paper, we present a comprehensive methodological comparison of three influential frameworks, namely Multimodal Adaptive Extraction (MAE), Solar, and UniMMQA, tracing the evolution of multimodal question answering from modality-adaptive pipelines to fully unified architectures. We examine how each approach models cross-modal interactions, transforms heterogeneous inputs, and performs reasoning, highlighting key design differences in modality representation, reasoning, and answer generation. Our analysis demonstrates a clear shift from explicit modality-specific processing toward unified text-centric formulations enabled by pre-trained language models (PLMs). Empirical comparisons across benchmark datasets show that this transition leads to substantial improvements in both Exact Match (EM) and F1-Scores, with UniMMQA achieving the most consistent and scalable performance. Despite these advances, we identify persistent challenges, including information loss during modality transformation, error propagation in multi-stage pipelines, and limitations in capturing fine-grained cross-modal dependencies. Overall, this study provides a deeper understanding of current design trends and offers insights into the future direction of unified multimodal reasoning systems.

Tue 8 SeptComputation and LanguageComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Answering questions from mixed sources like text, tables, and pictures is getting better. The authors compare three different approaches, showing how systems have evolved from handling each type of data separately to using a single language-based model for everything. They find that this unified approach improves accuracy but also point out some challenges like losing details when changing data formats. Their work helps us understand how these systems work and where future improvements may be needed.
Open 2609.08896v1

Structure aware method improves large language model table understanding

DeepTable: Structural Attention Biases and Tree Path Encoding for Hierarchical Table Understanding

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in table understanding. However, they typically process table content and headers as linearized token sequences. This representation weakens the two-dimensional and hierarchical structural relationships encoded by multi-level row and column headers. Existing parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods incorporate basic row and column information but do not explicitly capture the rich structural dependencies induced by hierarchical table headers. We propose DeepTable, a structure-aware approach for table understanding with LLMs. DeepTable comprises two complementary components. Structural Attention Bias (SAB) introduces learnable biases into the attention logits to explicitly represent whether pairs of table tokens share the same row or column. Tree Path Encoding (TPE) represents each table token using the ancestor paths of its row and column headers, preserving its position within the multi-level table structure. We integrate DeepTable with TableLoRA (He et al., 2025) to inject structural information into parameter-efficient adaptation. Across three LLM backbones, DeepTable consistently improves the corresponding TableLoRA baselines on three table question answering benchmarks, achieving average gains of 7.42 points on HiTab, 3.23 points on WikiTQ, and 2.01 BLEU points on FeTaQA. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed structural biases across different LLM backbones.

Mon 7 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Understanding tables with multiple levels of row and column headers is tricky for language models that read tables as simple lists. The authors propose DeepTable, which adds special ways for the model to know if two pieces belong in the same row or column and records where each cell fits in the table’s hierarchy. This helps the model better understand the structure of complex tables. Tests on different language models and question-answering tasks show DeepTable consistently improves performance over previous methods.
Open 2609.07707v1