cybersecurity response teams

Abstract: Detecting online social engineering (SE) scams often requires examining website workflows, verifying claims against external sources, and connecting evidence across multiple pages. Existing detectors provide limited support for these investigations, leaving analysts to manually gather and validate evidence, which inevitably delays detection and subsequent takedown of these attacks. To address this gap, we present ReDence, an open-source hybrid framework for adaptive, evidence-grounded detection across diverse SE scam categories. ReDence combines two locally hosted models with complementary responsibilities: a fine-tuned multimodal agentic Investigator (Qwen3.5-4B) that performs investigative planning, evidence interpretation, and reporting, and a specialized Decider (Tev1) that handles binary and multiple-choice tasks, including browser-action selection, evidence assessment, and decisions about whether to continue an investigation. By delegating discrete decisions to a specialized model, ReDence reduces reliance on lengthy language-model responses, while preserving the reasoning capabilities required for complex investigations. Our evaluation demonstrates that ReDence achieves 96\% accuracy in detecting scams across twelve SE scam categories, substantially outperforming existing detectors while being at least four times faster than comparable agentic models without compromising investigative depth. ReDence also produces structured, evidence-grounded reports that document investigative actions, supporting and contradictory evidence, and collected artifacts, which allow analysts to independently audit detection decisions and utilize the collected evidence to support subsequent mitigation and takedown efforts.

Abstract: The actions of frontline law enforcement officers in the initial hour of a cyber incident play a vital role in determining the ultimate success of an investigation. The minor mistakes they commit might result in irreversible critical impacts. The integrity of the investigation can be compromised, and the prosecution of cyber criminals can be hindered due to minor mistakes that happen in the initial hour. These are mainly because of the volatile nature of digital artifacts that might lead to procedural errors and evidence attrition. This paper provides a systematic survey of decision-support architectures designed to assist first responders of a cybercrime, categorizing them into playbooks, Large Language Models (LLMs), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) frameworks, and Agentic AI systems. The survey critically considers the constraints of limited technical proficiency and inconsistent forensic infrastructure in a practical scenario. Our analysis identifies RAG-based systems as a relatively viable intermediate solution due to their natural language adaptability. However, significant risk factors like prompt sensitivity and the potential for confident hallucinations in legal contexts pose a major challenge. Furthermore, we review current benchmarks in cybersecurity and demonstrate that they are not sufficient to capture the specific safety and legal requirements of law enforcement, focusing on the initial hour of the cybercrime. We conclude by arguing for the necessity of a new evaluation benchmark focused on naive query robustness and evidence preservation, so as to ensure that AI-driven guidance aligns with the mandatory demands of judicial proceedings.