Papers for

cybersecurity firms

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Large language models become more robust to input manipulation attacks

Evaluating and Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models to Input Sequence Variations

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) in production systems face prompt injections, trojans (backdoors), and manipulation of automatic quality metrics. This thesis develops models, methods, and algorithms for evaluating and improving LLM robustness to adversarial input sequence variations. We propose R_stab(f), a generative robustness metric based on the Jensen-Shannon divergence between per-step output distributions under small input perturbations. For localized attacks we prove V(h) <= 1 - R_class(h), where R_class(h) is the probability that a decision operator h keeps its decision under small perturbations. For non-localized attacks we propose a calibrated empirical model. For LLM-as-a-Judge systems we develop ASA, an adaptive evolutionary black-box attack that reaches an attack success rate (ASR) of up to 73.8%, with transfer between open models up to 62.6%. On Trojan Detection Challenge 2023 data (Pythia-1.4B), surrogate triggers reach REASR ~0.99 while recall of the true triggers is ~0.17 against a baseline of ~0.14. On SaTML CTF 2024 we systematize four classes of bypasses of multi-layer defenses, which reduce the ASR from 90% to 15-25%. Committees of 5-7 heterogeneous models reduce the ASR for Gemma-3-4B by 47-55 percentage points, to 19.3% with 7 models. For agentic systems based on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), we propose AttestMCP, which attests tool calls with HMAC-protected packets at under 0.1 ms per call, and the Commit Boundary isolation pattern. On the MCPBench benchmark of 847 scenarios they reduce the average ASR from 53.7% to 12.4%. The methods are implemented in the JudgeGuard and TrojanArmor software suites and the MCPSec module.

Thu 1 OctCryptography and SecurityComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Large language models can be tricked by small changes in the input, causing wrong or harmful responses. The authors develop new measurements and methods to test how stable these models are under such attacks and to improve their defenses. They created attacks that work well even when copied to different models and found ways to reduce these attacks' success rates significantly. Their methods include combining multiple models and adding protections for how tools are called in complex systems. They provide software tools to help detect and prevent these problems.
Open → 2610.02432v1

Ai attacks can hack brain controlled devices and steal thoughts

NERVE Attacks: Breaking AI-Powered Brain-Computer Interfaces

Abstract: The rapid integration of AI into human-centred systems such as Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) has created a poorly understood attack surface linking neural signals to physical systems. Exploits in this domain threaten cognitive autonomy, mental privacy, and physical safety, from neural data exfiltration to malicious control of BCI-tethered devices. We introduce the NERVE Attacks class, a systematic characterisation of five orthogonal attack dimensions that together span the complete BCI stack: Neuro-mimetic Forgery (N), Evasion via Desynchronization (E), Replay-based Hijacking (R), Vein Tapping (V), and Embedded Backdoors (E). To evaluate this class, we present EEGle, an AI-assisted extensible framework for systematic BCI security analysis. Our evaluation uncovers 17 novel neuro-specific attack instances and reveals a stealth-effectiveness spectrum unique to BCI backdoor design. We also show that generative AI lowers the barrier to entry for non-expert attackers and provide EEGle to the community for building and verifying the security of these deeply personal devices.

Tue 8 SeptCryptography and Security
The gist
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) let people control devices using brain signals, but these devices can be hacked in many new ways. The authors identify five different types of attacks that trick or take over these systems, risking user privacy and safety. They created a tool called EEGle to test and find these kinds of attacks automatically. Their work shows that even people without expert skills can use AI to hack BCIs and that these attacks are hard to detect.
Open → 2609.08971v1