Papers for

cybersecurity compliance teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Framework helps manage cybersecurity risks for satellite missions

SCRM: An Actionable Framework for Space Cyber Risk Management

Abstract: Space infrastructures play critical roles in modern society, including satellite communications (SATCOM). Like the Internet, space infrastructures are vulnerable to cyber attacks, or space cyber attacks, highlighting the importance of managing cyber risks to space infrastructures, or space cyber risks. However, adequately managing space cyber risks is an open problem. In this paper, we propose the first Space Cyber Risk Management (SCRM) framework to systematically analyze and mitigate space cyber risks. The framework models space infrastructures, space missions, and space cyber attacks, while offering algorithms for space mission risk analysis and hardening. We demonstrate its usefulness by conducting a case study on real-world space cyber attacks against the SATCOM infrastructure implemented in our testbed. Our results show, among other things, that: (i) dealing with space cyber attack cascading effects is essential to space cyber risk management; (ii) the framework can effectively harden space missions; (iii) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) security controls can effectively mitigate space cyber risks.

Fri 2 OctCryptography and Security
The gist
Space systems like satellites are important but can be attacked by hackers, which can cause big problems. The authors created a first-of-its-kind framework called SCRM to understand and reduce these cybersecurity risks for space missions. Their system looks at the space infrastructure, missions, and possible cyber attacks, and uses algorithms to analyze risks and improve defenses. They tested it on real satellite communication attacks and found it can help prevent cascading failures and improve security using standards like NIST.
Open → 2610.03970v1

Industrial control system resilience linked to adversarial attack strength

Towards a Resilience-Theoretic Foundation for Adversarial Robustness in Industrial Control System Anomaly Detection

Abstract: Anomaly-based intrusion detection systems in industrial control systems (ICS) and operational technology (OT) environments are increasingly required to meet formal resilience criteria: absorbed adversarial disturbances, graceful degradation under sustained attack, and certified system-level guarantees. Existing resilience frameworks for cyber-physical systems define absorb-recover-adapt trajectories at the architectural level but do not treat machine learning anomaly detectors as first-class components, leaving a gap between component-level robustness evaluation and system-level resilience certification. In this paper, we establish that adversarial robustness in ICS anomaly detection is a specific instantiation of system resilience, and formalise this connection by mapping four resilience constructs, i.e. disturbance class, absorption capacity, recovery trajectory, and degradation function, onto the adversarial machine learning setting. We derive a compositional resilience bound for heterogeneous ICS detection networks, showing that the binding constraint on system-level resilience is the coupling-adjusted absorption capacity of each node along the attack path, not the per-node capacity -- so the binding node need not be the weakest one. Empirical validation on the BATADAL water distribution system benchmark demonstrates that the resulting metrics surface operationally significant phenomena invisible to standard benchmarks: the absorption-degradation divergence under adversarial training, and the paradox that hardening the binding node in isolation reduces system-level resilience. Implications for ICS architecture design and certification standards are discussed.

Mon 7 SeptCryptography and SecurityArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Industrial control systems, like those managing water supply, need to detect unusual or harmful behavior even when attackers try to fool these systems. The authors show that protecting these systems against tricky attacks is part of a bigger idea called system resilience, which means how well a system can absorb shocks and keep working safely. They created mathematical tools linking how individual detection parts work to the whole system's ability to handle attacks. Their tests found surprising results, such as improving one part might actually hurt overall safety. This work helps build safer control systems and shape future safety standards.
Open → 2609.07244v1