Papers for
cybersecurity compliance teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Framework helps manage cybersecurity risks for satellite missions
SCRM: An Actionable Framework for Space Cyber Risk Management
Abstract: Space infrastructures play critical roles in modern society, including satellite communications (SATCOM). Like the Internet, space infrastructures are vulnerable to cyber attacks, or space cyber attacks, highlighting the importance of managing cyber risks to space infrastructures, or space cyber risks. However, adequately managing space cyber risks is an open problem. In this paper, we propose the first Space Cyber Risk Management (SCRM) framework to systematically analyze and mitigate space cyber risks. The framework models space infrastructures, space missions, and space cyber attacks, while offering algorithms for space mission risk analysis and hardening. We demonstrate its usefulness by conducting a case study on real-world space cyber attacks against the SATCOM infrastructure implemented in our testbed. Our results show, among other things, that: (i) dealing with space cyber attack cascading effects is essential to space cyber risk management; (ii) the framework can effectively harden space missions; (iii) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) security controls can effectively mitigate space cyber risks.
Industrial control system resilience linked to adversarial attack strength
Towards a Resilience-Theoretic Foundation for Adversarial Robustness in Industrial Control System Anomaly Detection
Abstract: Anomaly-based intrusion detection systems in industrial control systems (ICS) and operational technology (OT) environments are increasingly required to meet formal resilience criteria: absorbed adversarial disturbances, graceful degradation under sustained attack, and certified system-level guarantees. Existing resilience frameworks for cyber-physical systems define absorb-recover-adapt trajectories at the architectural level but do not treat machine learning anomaly detectors as first-class components, leaving a gap between component-level robustness evaluation and system-level resilience certification. In this paper, we establish that adversarial robustness in ICS anomaly detection is a specific instantiation of system resilience, and formalise this connection by mapping four resilience constructs, i.e. disturbance class, absorption capacity, recovery trajectory, and degradation function, onto the adversarial machine learning setting. We derive a compositional resilience bound for heterogeneous ICS detection networks, showing that the binding constraint on system-level resilience is the coupling-adjusted absorption capacity of each node along the attack path, not the per-node capacity -- so the binding node need not be the weakest one. Empirical validation on the BATADAL water distribution system benchmark demonstrates that the resulting metrics surface operationally significant phenomena invisible to standard benchmarks: the absorption-degradation divergence under adversarial training, and the paradox that hardening the binding node in isolation reduces system-level resilience. Implications for ICS architecture design and certification standards are discussed.