Papers for

customer feedback analysts

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Calon improves entity relation and event extraction across domains

Calibrated Typed Decisions for Entity, Relation, and Event Extraction

Abstract: Information extraction models often perform well on the datasets they are trained on, but transferring to new domains and annotation guidelines remains challenging. Supporting user-specified types alone does not resolve this problem. We present CalOn, a unified 0.6B-parameter encoder for entity, relation, and event extraction across datasets and schemas. The model jointly encodes text and type definitions, then directly identifies entity spans, relations between spans, and event triggers and arguments. Its extraction decisions consider the requested types together, using their combined evidence to identify relevant candidates before assigning a type. This gives all three tasks a common probabilistic formulation while keeping every extracted mention anchored to the input text. We train on diverse sources, and supplement supervised learning with a reward that encourages correct extractions and penalises incorrect ones. Across 40 benchmarks, CalOn outperforms the evaluated baselines on most benchmarks. It leads all reported relation extraction benchmarks and achieves the highest average F1 for event triggers and arguments with gold triggers. The same model also performs strongly on aspect sentiment triplet extraction and pronoun resolution through its span-pair formulation. A correction for the probability bias introduced during training improves confidence estimates for entities, relations, and event arguments after calibration, with little change in F1.

Mon 12 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Information extraction means finding specific details like names, relationships, and events in text. Models often struggle when used on new types of text or different rules. The authors made a model called CalOn that reads text and the types of information to look for together, helping it find these details more accurately across many tasks. It was trained on lots of different sources and uses a smart way to reward correct answers, making it better than other methods in many tests. The model also improves how confident it is about its answers without hurting its accuracy.
Open → 2610.17113v1

Arabic social media stance detection excels on unseen targets

StanceEval 2026: The Second Stance Detection Shared Task

Abstract: StanceEval 2026 is the second edition of the StanceEval shared task series on stance detection in Arabic social media text. Stance detection aims to identify a writer's stance toward a given topic. Given a tweet and a target, participating systems must determine whether the writer's stance is Favor, Against, or None. This edition focuses on cross-target generalization across two distinct evaluation tracks: Track 1 evaluates thematically related cross-target transfer (testing on Women Driving, related to Women Empowerment from training data), while Track 2 evaluates cross-domain transfer to completely unseen targets (E-Cars and Trimester System). The shared task attracted 80 registered teams from 12 countries. During the evaluation phase, 30 unique teams submitted entries, with 21 teams officially ranked in Track 1 and 13 in Track 2 following validation filtering, and 20 teams submitting system-description papers. Participating teams employed diverse methodologies, including fine-tuned pretrained language models, prompt-based and retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs), fine-tuned LLMs, and hybrid cascades. Top systems achieved impressive $F_{avg2}$ scores of 0.8994 on Track 1 and 0.9400 on Track 2, substantially outperforming the strongest baselines (0.7366 and 0.7475, respectively), where $F_{avg2}$ denotes the macro-averaged F1 score over the Favor and Against classes. Counterintuitively, performance on the unseen targets was higher than on the related target, a disparity could be driven by extreme target polarization, class imbalance, and dialectal or sarcastic nuance across topics.

Fri 2 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Detecting whether someone supports or opposes a topic in social media posts is hard, especially when topics change. The authors ran a competition where teams built systems to guess stance on Arabic tweets about different topics. Surprisingly, systems did better on completely new topics than on related ones. This might be because some topics are more strongly debated or tricky to understand because of dialect or sarcasm. Various advanced language AI methods were used, improving accuracy a lot compared to basic models.
Open → 2610.03215v1

Adapted English sentiment tools improve Arabic dialect classification accuracy

BARRAC: Adaptation of an English Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis Approach for Classification Tasks in Arabic Dialects

Abstract: With the rapid growth of Arabic NLP, several models, datasets and benchmarks have been reported. This paper asks whether approaches developed for majority languages like English can be adapted to Arabic tasks. We adapt an English aspect-based sentiment analysis framework to Arabic classification tasks and present the adaptation as BARRAC: Brainstorming Alignment and Replaced Representation learning for ArabiC tasks. BARRAC replaces consumer-review attribute pools with Arabic linguistic devices and markers for dialectal sentiment, sarcasm, and dialect identification, and replaces noisy self-training with two-stage training. Evaluated on five Arabic dialect datasets, BARRAC achieves a mean macro-F1 of 63.93\%, outperforming the best few-label SOTA by 3\%, and outperforming GPT-4o on four out of five tasks. Error analysis provides insights into remaining challenges. These results demonstrate that adapting task-specific approaches is a promising direction for Arabic NLP alongside adapting models, datasets and benchmarks.

Wed 30 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Sentiment analysis helps computers understand how people feel in text. This paper looks at whether methods made for English can work well for Arabic dialects. The authors created BARRAC by changing parts of an English tool to better fit Arabic language markers like sarcasm and dialect differences. BARRAC outperformed previous Arabic methods and even did better than a powerful AI model called GPT-4o on most tested tasks. This shows it's helpful to adapt language-specific tools, not just models and data, when working with Arabic.
Open → 2609.38820v1