customer analytics teams

Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) lets tabular foundation models make predictions without dataset-specific training or fine-tuning. These models achieve strong predictive accuracy, but interpreting how individual features contribute to the prediction remains difficult. In biology, for example, feature contributions can help identify biomarkers or risk genes. Post-hoc interpretability methods assign feature importance scores, but these scores do not indicate what the model actually uses and can lead to explanation errors. We introduce TICL$^3$ (Tabular In-Context Local Linear Learning), an interpretable-by-design predictor that uses a tabular foundation model to guide a simple linear prediction rule. TICL$^3$ first learns a shared linear model to capture dataset-level feature effects. Then, for each query, it retrieves similar training samples using representations from the foundation model and fits a second linear model to the residuals in that neighborhood. The shared model captures broad effects, while the local model corrects errors among similar samples. Their combined coefficients determine each feature contribution to the final query-specific linear score, so the same model makes and explains the prediction. Across 386 classification benchmark-dataset evaluations, TICL$^3$ trails TabICLv2 by 1.1 percentage points and outperforms CatBoost in 266 evaluations. It improves average support F1 over MAPLE by 4.7 points and achieves the best performance on both real-data selected-feature utility metrics.

Abstract: We introduce an iterative framework that automates the extraction of interpretable, schema-bound categorical features from unstructured text for tabular prediction models. To navigate the feature space, a generator LLM proposes semantic definitions, a separate extractor LLM materializes the features, and a downstream tabular model evaluates their predictive performance. We optimize this search by translating explicit model errors, such as AUC ranking inversions, into natural-language feedback, steering the LLM to resolve specific predictive failures. Evaluated across three public datasets, this error-driven loop accelerates feature discovery by up to $3\times$ compared to unguided search. Empirically, the generated features demonstrate strong multi-view complementarity, strictly outperforming any subset when combined with TF-IDF and dense embeddings. Finally, the framework guarantees instance-level interpretability: the discovered features dominate SHAP importance rankings and provide a fully transparent, semantic audit trail for every prediction.

Abstract: \texttt{URANIA} provides end-to-end differential privacy (DP) for summaries of data-dependent clusters. However, its cluster--keyword release does not directly provide collection-wide aggregates for semantic concepts defined independently of the protected corpus. Records may express several concepts, records expressing the same concept may be assigned to different clusters, and cluster identities need not correspond across analyses. Consequently, cluster-level statistics do not directly provide comparable measurements of predefined concepts across collections or repeated analyses. We introduce \texttt{DP-SPIN}, a trusted-curator framework for aggregate measurement and summarization over semantic concepts fixed independently of the protected target records. Each record is mapped to a bounded sparse nonnegative vector over these concepts, whose sum forms a semantic sketch. A differentially private mechanism releases a semantic plan containing admitted concepts and noisy masses; normalized semantic-support values and support bins are obtained by post-processing. For user-level privacy, each user's aggregate contribution is clipped to a fixed bound. The language model receives only the plan and fixed decoding instructions, while a public verifier checks concept mentions, reported values, comparisons, and rank claims against the released plan. The final summary is differentially private by post-processing. We establish record- and user-level DP guarantees under add/drop and replacement adjacency. We evaluate \texttt{DP-SPIN} under record-level privacy on CFPB complaint narratives, Amazon All Beauty reviews, and Yelp restaurant reviews, and under user-level privacy on Amazon and Yelp. We compare \texttt{DP-SPIN} with non-private plan and summary references, DP keyword and category histogram baselines, and a \texttt{URANIA}-style baseline with a fixed public keyword vocabulary.