Papers for

cryptocurrency portfolio managers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

DeFi yield risk forecasting improves with new dataset and loss function

A Multi-Asset Dataset and Tail-Risk Framework for DeFi Yield Trading Derivatives

Abstract: Yield trading has emerged as a pivotal innovation in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) by decoupling principal from yield streams to enhance capital efficiency. Despite its significance, the field lacks fine-grained datasets for systematic empirical analysis. We address this gap by constructing the first large-scale benchmark dataset for Pendle, the pioneering on-chain interest rate derivatives protocol, spanning 24 months across 340 active markets with complete lifecycle observations. Our analysis reveals a structural market transition toward stablecoin-dominated "flight-to-quality" dynamics. To tackle the heavy-tailed nature of yield data, we propose Tail-MSE, an asymmetric loss function that prioritizes tail risk awareness through dynamic penalty weighting. Experiments across six state-of-the-art time series models demonstrate consistent improvements in volatility forecasting robustness, enabling the Tail-MSE Sniper strategy to achieve superior risk-adjusted returns in over half of all markets.

Mon 26 OctComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Predicting risks in decentralized finance (DeFi) yield trading is hard because the data often have rare but extreme changes. The authors created a big new dataset from Pendle, a leading DeFi platform, that tracks many markets and their full life cycles over two years. They noticed the market has shifted toward safer stablecoins recently. To better predict risks, they designed a new method that focuses more on the rare big changes in yields. Tested on various forecasting models, this method helped create a trading approach that often earned better returns relative to risk.
Open → 2610.34930v1

Cryptocurrency failure can be predicted using price and market data

Blockchain Lifecycle Prediction - Dead Coins

Abstract: The cryptocurrency ecosystem has experienced extraordinary growth alongside an equally remarkable rate of failure, with over 52 percent of all tokens launched since 2021 ceasing to trade by early 2025. Despite the scale of this phenomenon, predictive modeling of cryptocurrency death remains an underdeveloped area of research, constrained by definitional ambiguity, data scarcity, and the absence of granular lifecycle frameworks. This work investigates whether the failure of cryptocurrency assets can be predicted using publicly available market data and deep learning methods. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network was trained on 90-day sequences of daily reference price and estimated market capitalization for 82 cryptocurrency assets (41 alive and 41 dead), sourced from Coin Metrics over the period 2020 to 2026. The model was evaluated using a strictly chronological train-test split to prevent look-ahead bias. The LSTM classifier achieved in best cases a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC AUC) of 0.98 on the held-out test set. Finally, the model was applied to unseen data, and it was observed that the ROC AUC decreased between 0.59 and 0.65. The findings demonstrate that temporal patterns in price and market capitalization alone contain sufficient discriminative signal to identify assets on a trajectory towards economic inactivity. Diagnostic analyzes reveal that failing assets exhibit gradual value erosion and elevated volatility in the months preceding inactivity, rather than sudden catastrophic collapse. This work also documents the practical infeasibility of a multi-stage lifecycle model under current data conditions and justifies the transition to a binary classification approach.

Thu 1 OctDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
The gist
Many cryptocurrencies stop trading and become worthless, but predicting which ones will fail is hard because of unclear definitions and limited data. The authors trained a special kind of AI called an LSTM network on historical price and market size data from 82 cryptocurrencies. Their model could often tell which coins were likely to fail just by looking at patterns in the data over a few months. They found that coins usually lose value and become more volatile gradually before dying, rather than crashing suddenly.
Open → 2610.01379v1