Papers for

construction automation teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Plan robot team skills for flexible building assembly tasks

Skill Sequence Planning for Collaborative Multi-Robot Construction

Abstract: Robots have significant potential to automate construction processes. However, their industry adoption remains limited, partly because of the programming effort required to adapt robots to diverse tasks. This paper presents a skill sequence planning method that enables a heterogeneous team of multi-functional robots to collaboratively perform construction assembly work using reusable, preprogrammed skills such as grasping, drilling, and fastening. A central controller transforms the digital representation of the building into a construction relationship graph that represents construction entities, their states, and their parent-child relationships. Based on this representation, the system selects the next construction target, generates a symbolic sequence of skills for capable members of the robot team, and produces collision-free geometric motion plans for skill execution. The symbolic planning problem is dynamically regenerated as the construction state changes. An interactive digital twin presents the planned skill sequence and robot states to human co-workers for review and approval before execution. The method is evaluated through a construction assembly case study. By reducing the need to program robots separately for each task variation, the proposed approach supports more flexible deployment of collaborative robot teams in construction.

Tue 22 SeptRobotics
The gist
Building with robots can be hard because each task needs special programming. This paper shows a way to plan sequences of robot actions, like grabbing or drilling, so different robots can work together on building projects. The system uses a digital model of the building to decide what to build next and how each robot should help without crashing into each other. People can watch the plan in a digital copy of the job before the robots start working. The approach makes it easier to use robot teams for construction without programming every little step anew.
Open → 2609.25649v1

Persistent physical state improves robot excavation models

PileBelief: Persistent Physical State for Interaction-Driven World Modeling

Abstract: World models allow robots to anticipate action consequences before execution. This capability is especially valuable in excavation, where each scoop reshapes the terrain and affects subsequent actions. Local observations, however, cannot fully reveal the underlying support and material conditions. We present PileBelief, an interaction-driven persistent world model for partially observed excavation that retains physical evidence beyond the visible surface. It combines an observation-conditioned physical prior with world-addressed deformation memory and physical-response memory. Action-aligned reads and gated residual corrections refine terrain-change and outcome predictions. With deployment weights fixed, completed interactions update measured belief, while hypothetical actions advance a separate imagined state. Compared with a current-observation-only baseline, PileBelief reduces five-step joint prediction error by 10.8% and offline action-selection regret by 65.5%. Experiments on Newton/MPM and real excavation datasets further demonstrate improved terrain-change and bucket-volume prediction. Our method enables multi-step prediction and candidate-action ranking from local observations, even when the underlying soil state is unknown. These results identify persistent physical belief as a useful representation for world models of environments that robots continually reshape.

Sat 19 SeptRobotics
The gist
Robots digging soil struggle to predict how the ground will change because what’s under the surface can’t be seen directly. The authors designed PileBelief, a method that keeps track of physical changes over time, not just what is visible at the moment. This approach helps robots better guess how their scoops will reshape the terrain and how much material they will collect. Tests show it improves prediction accuracy and decision making compared to methods that only use current observations.
Open → 2609.22858v1

Robotic assembly uses material data to limit insertion forces

From Documented Strengths to Force Limits: Material-Informed Robotic Insertion for Construction Assembly

Abstract: Insertion is a fundamental operation in robotic construction assembly, where variations in material properties and assembly conditions make it difficult to select contact forces that complete the task without exceeding the assembly's capacity. Although construction documents encode engineering knowledge about materials and their conditions, translating this knowledge into load limits for a specific assembly remains difficult. This paper presents SAGE (Source-grounded Assembly Gating and Execution), a system that converts documented material evidence into capacity estimates for robotic insertion. SAGE restricts a large language model (LLM) to extracting tensile and compressive strengths from retrieved passages and tables and records their sources. A response model then interpolates offline finite element (FE) solutions to convert these strengths and the assembly conditions into axial load capacity. For fits with positive clearance, the estimated capacity sets the policy's axial force limit; for interference fits, it is compared with measured support demand to determine admission. On the primary benchmark, SAGE reduces mean capacity error from 80.65\% for direct LLM estimates based on the same evidence to 10.74\%. Without refitting, the mean error remains 8.00\% on 16 additional geometries. Under the assigned support release model, SAGE correctly classifies 59 of 62 scored simulation runs, with only conservative errors. In recorded xArm6 demonstrations, SAGE takes material documents as input and completes physical insertion in 9 of 13 trials. These results show that assigning document interpretation to the LLM and force calculation to an explicit mechanical model produces accurate capacity estimates and traceable insertion decisions.

Fri 18 SeptRoboticsArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Robotic machines that put parts together in construction need to know how much force to use so they don't damage materials. This paper shows a system called SAGE that reads material strengths from documents and combines that with mechanical models to figure out safe force limits. This method is more accurate than letting a language AI guess the limits alone. The system was tested in simulations and on a robot arm with good results, helping ensure safe and successful assembly.
Open → 2609.22609v1

Robot excavators learn to move soil like human operators

Size Doesn't Matter: Material-State Reinforcement Learning for Excavator Transferable Soil Manipulation

Abstract: Earthmoving tasks such as excavation, backfilling, or embankment construction require deliberate repositioning of deformable soil. For these tasks, human operators use all shovel faces, while autonomous systems so far are limited to excavation and dumping. Current methods often rely on heuristic models but do not incorporate soil mechanics. We address this shortcoming by using Reinforcement Learning in a GPU-parallelized Material Point Method particle simulation. Our controllers are conditioned on material state such as shape and compactness, enabling skills that use multiple contact faces of the tool and displace material both inside and outside of the shovel. To use the same learned weights across machines, our policies operate in a normalized end-effector space and are deployed through a calibrated machine interface. We evaluate this calibrated transfer on an 11.5t hydraulic excavator and a 500g tabletop robot. We validate performance through autonomous construction of a 42m long, 2.1m high embankment in 45min, executing 201 individual policy strokes without failure, retry, or operator intervention. In a direct comparison, the autonomous controller matches an expert operator's progression speed and produces a higher, more consistent embankment. Additional qualitative backfilling and compaction experiments demonstrate the material-state awareness and calibrated transfer across machines.

Fri 11 SeptRobotics
The gist
Moving dirt with machines like excavators is hard because soil changes shape and isn’t like solid objects. The authors trained robots using a physics-based simulation so the machines can handle soil more like people do, using all parts of the shovel and adjusting for soil shape and compactness. Their program works on big machines and small robots without retraining, and it successfully built a large embankment automatically, matching human experts in speed and quality. This shows robots can learn to work with soil more flexibly and reliably.
Open → 2609.12677v1