Papers for

computational imaging engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Bayesian Anything Model improves computational imaging with fewer steps

BAM! Bayesian Anything Model: a foundation model for generative computational imaging

Abstract: Generative models are transforming Bayesian computational imaging, yet the field still lacks physics-aware foundation models. Current practice falls into two camps. Large foundation image models are deployed as plug-and-play priors with zero-shot approximate likelihood guidance, which introduces significant bias and computational cost. Physics-aware generative models avoid this bias, but each is tied to a specific dataset, task and instrument. We introduce BAM (Bayesian Anything Model), a lightweight foundation model for few-step, physics-aware posterior sampling that generalises robustly to unseen data and tasks, zero-shot or with minimal finetuning. BAM upgrades the operator-conditioned Reconstruct Anything Model (RAM) backbone (Terris et al.) into a conditional flow map, so instrument physics is specified at inference time rather than fixed during training. BAM has just 36M parameters and is pre-trained jointly on large image corpora and libraries of forward operators. A single network then draws posterior samples in a few steps, with no likelihood approximation and no guidance weights to tune. Across linear inverse problems on FFHQ, AFHQ, LSUN, DIV2K and the Kohler camera-shake benchmark, BAM outperforms in just 3 steps both specialised models and leading zero-shot methods in sample quality, at a fraction of their computational cost. BAM gives the community an accessible entry point to generative computational imaging, lowers the economic and environmental cost of training imaging models, and opens a new path for research on physics-aware Bayesian computational imaging. Official page: https://bayesian-anything-model.github.io/

Wed 30 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Computational imaging tries to reconstruct original images from incomplete or noisy data but often struggles with bias or limited methods. The authors introduce the Bayesian Anything Model (BAM), a versatile tool that uses knowledge of the imaging instruments to better guess the original image. BAM is lightweight, can handle many types of imaging problems, and works quickly with minimal tuning. It outperforms other specialized methods on several common image reconstruction challenges while using less computing power.
Open → 2609.39660v1

Accurate stable recovery for phase retrieval using coded diffraction patterns

Stable Recovery and Benign Overparameterized Landscapes for Phase Retrieval from Coded Diffraction Patterns

Abstract: Coded diffraction patterns (CDPs) provide a structured and physically relevant model for phase retrieval, but the dependence among Fourier measurements generated by a common mask makes sharp stability analysis challenging. For a fixed unit-norm signal $\boldsymbol{x}_\star \in \mathbb{C}^n$, let $\boldsymbol{X}_\star=\boldsymbol{x}_\star\boldsymbol{x}_\star^*$, and let $\mathcal A$ be the lifted CDP measurement operator. We prove that, with $L=O(\log n)$ random masks, the following uniform lower isometry holds with high probability: $\|\boldsymbol{X}-\boldsymbol{X}_\star\|_F \lesssim \log^2(2n) \frac{\|\mathcal A(\boldsymbol{X}-\boldsymbol{X}_\star)\|_2}{\sqrt{nL}}, \boldsymbol{X}\succeq\boldsymbol{0},$ from which we derive two consequences. First, for $\boldsymbol{y}=\mathcal A(\boldsymbol{X}_\star)+\boldsymbol{e}$, PhaseLift-type convex programs achieve the Gaussian-type stable recovery bound $\|\widehat{\boldsymbol{X}}-\boldsymbol{X}_\star\|_F \lesssim \frac{\log^2(2n)}{\sqrt{nL}}\|\boldsymbol{e}\|_2.$ Second, in the noiseless case, the nonconvex factorized loss has a benign landscape when the factor width satisfies $r = O(\log^5(2n))$: every second-order critical point $\boldsymbol{V}\in\mathbb C^{n\times r}$ satisfies $\boldsymbol{V}\boldsymbol{V}^*=\boldsymbol{X}_\star$. The key ingredient is a uniform operator-norm bound over row subsets of the dependent CDP measurement matrix, which permits the removal of a controlled set of adaptively selected rows while preserving tangent injectivity.

Fri 25 SeptInformation Theory
The gist
The paper deals with the problem of reconstructing a signal from intensity measurements, specifically using coded diffraction patterns. The authors show that with a small number of random masks, their method can reliably and stably recover the original signal even when there is noise. They also demonstrate that certain mathematical formulations used to find the signal have no troublesome false solutions under these conditions. This helps guarantee that recovery algorithms work well in practice for these types of problems.
Open → 2609.30825v1

Learning to speed up diffusion posterior sampling without MCMC

Learning to Replace MCMC in Split-Gibbs Diffusion Posterior Sampling via Deep Unfolding

Abstract: Split Gibbs sampling enables diffusion posterior inference for general nonlinear inverse problems by decoupling prior and likelihood computations, allowing a pretrained diffusion prior to be reused across measurement models. However, its likelihood update often relies on iterative MCMC, which can hinder parallelization, require algorithm-specific tuning, and incur substantial computational cost. In this work, we propose a learning-based framework to replace this MCMC step by reformulating both Gibbs updates as Gaussian denoising problems and implementing them through ODE diffusion. The prior step reuses a pretrained denoiser, while the likelihood denoiser exploits known likelihood structure through a lightweight deep-unfolded network. Experiments on nonlinear phase retrieval demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method as an alternative to MCMC-based split Gibbs at lower likelihood-update cost.

Thu 24 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Many computer vision and imaging problems require guessing the original scene from incomplete or noisy data, which often needs complex calculations. The authors study a method that helps make these guesses by breaking down the problem into easier parts, but one step was slow and hard to run in parallel because it used a random sampling method (MCMC). They replaced this slow step with a learned neural network approach that treats the problem like cleaning up noisy images, making the process faster and easier to run on modern hardware. Tests showed this new approach works well on a type of problem called nonlinear phase retrieval.
Open → 2609.30539v1