Papers for

computational drug designers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Attentive geometric learning improves antibody design accuracy and affinity

AbGaze: Attentive Geometric Representation Learning for End-to-End Antibody Design

Abstract: Computational antibody design requires representations that capture the geometric patterns underlying antigen--antibody interactions, yet existing approaches often rely on scalar distances or surface-intrinsic features, leaving cross-molecular geometry largely implicit. We present AbGaze, an end-to-end antibody design framework based on attentive geometric representation learning, which encodes distance, spatial direction, and surface-normal orientation of antigen surfaces relative to antibody-residue local frames, and adaptively aggregates these geometric interactions according to their interfacial context. The learned interaction representation is shared across multi-CDR co-design, complex structure prediction, and affinity optimization, with local-frame geometric supervision further constraining the representation. AbGaze outperforms prior methods across all three tasks: relative to the second-best method, it improves amino-acid recovery by 7.1% and reduces structural error by 14.9% on average over the six CDRs, improves interface docking quality (DockQ) by 6.6%, and raises the affinity improvement rate (IMP) by 32.5%.

Mon 28 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Designing antibodies that fit well with antigens is important for medicine, but it requires understanding complex 3D shapes and interactions. The authors created AbGaze, a method that looks closely at distances, directions, and surface shapes to better capture these details. This helps design antibodies more accurately, predict their structures, and improve how strongly they bind. AbGaze works better than earlier methods in several tests involving antibody parts, docking, and strength of binding.
Open → 2609.35296v1

PhiFold generates protein shapes and how they move together

PhiFold: Towards Dynamic Protein Design with Physics-Structured Covariance Modeling

Abstract: Protein design is moving beyond structural correctness toward function-aware design, yet existing generative models typically treat dynamics as a downstream property estimated through simulation or prediction after structure generation. Using MD trajectories as a generative target is also undesirable because stochastic, path-dependent trajectories over-specify the underlying equilibrium ensemble. We introduce PhiFold, a framework for jointly generating protein backbones and their second-order dynamics, represented by residue-displacement covariance. Rather than predicting the quadratically sized full covariance, PhiFold decomposes dynamics into three interpretable components: local flexibility, a low-rank collective-motion representation, and residue-wise collective participation. These components are assembled into a positive-definite covariance matrix with exact marginal consistency, yielding a compact and physically constrained representation of equilibrium dynamics. Across generated proteins, PhiFold improves recovery of local fluctuations and long-range residue coupling while remaining competitive on dominant collective-motion subspaces. It further enables bidirectional control of residue flexibility while preserving backbone designability. By unifying structure generation with an explicit representation of equilibrium dynamics, PhiFold lays a foundation for designing proteins not only by how they look, but also by how they move.

Sat 26 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Designing proteins with the right shape is important, but knowing how they move is even more crucial for their function. The authors introduce PhiFold, a method that creates protein backbones while also modeling their natural movements through a special kind of matrix called a covariance matrix. Instead of predicting complex data directly, PhiFold breaks it down into simpler, understandable parts to represent local flexibility and collective motions. This method helps design proteins not only by their structures but also by their dynamics, potentially improving how proteins work.
Open → 2609.32309v1