Papers for

combinatorial auction engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Computational limits of fair item allocation with three value levels

Settling the Computational Complexity of Max-Min Allocation with Ternary Valuations

Abstract: We study the problem of computing an allocation of indivisible items that maximizes egalitarian welfare, i.e., the utility of the worst-off agent, when agents' item values or marginal values belong to a small set. For additive valuations with values in $\{p,q\}$, where $q>p>0$ and $\gcd(p,q)=1$, we give a polynomial-time algorithm when $p=2$ and prove constant-gap hardness when $p\geq3$, already with exactly three high-valued goods per agent. We also give an $\sqrt{3/2}$-approximation for common positive bi-valued additive valuations. For mixed additive valuations in $\{-p,0,c\}$, where $p\in\{1,2\}$ and $c$ is a positive integer, a reduction to maximum-weight perfect matching resolves the conjectured tractability of $\{-2,0,c\}$-valuations. For submodular valuations with marginals in $\{-2,0,c\}$, where $c$ is odd, we establish an exact unit-gap hardness result and exponential value-query lower bounds, even when all but one agent are additive. Finally, for $\{-1,0,1\}$-submodular valuations, we prove that no finite multiplicative approximation exists unless $\p=\np$. Together, our results resolve open questions and provide a complete picture of the computational complexity of max-min allocation with ternary valuations.

Sun 4 OctComputer Science and Game TheoryArtificial Intelligence
The gist
This paper looks at how to fairly divide a set of indivisible items among people when each item can have only a few different value levels for each person. The authors find which cases can be solved quickly by a computer and which are much harder, even impossible to approximate well. They explore different types of value settings, including positive-only values, mixed positive and negative values, and more complex valuation types. Their results settle long-standing questions about how hard it is to find the fairest allocation under these conditions.
Open → 2610.05237v1