Papers for

cognitive computing engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Bilingual language models predict second language reading influenced by first language

Bilingual Language Models Capture Cross-Linguistic Influence in Second-Language Reading

Abstract: While monolingual language model (LM) surprisal is widely established as a predictor of reading times, it cannot capture the non-native (L2) reading dynamics that are shaped by the reader's first language (L1). In this work, we investigate whether the cross-lingual transfer within bilingual models aligns with human L1-driven biases during L2 reading. We evaluate bilingual models on eye-tracking data of readers from 12 diverse L1 backgrounds reading English texts. To isolate L1-specific transfer, we compare bilingual models trained on an L1 that matches the readers' L1 background to both a monolingual English baseline and bilingual models trained on other L1s. We demonstrate that matching the readers' L1 improves the prediction of L2 reading times. This predictive advantage is concentrated in late-stage eye-tracking measures, modulated by L1-L2 script overlap, and peaks among intermediate-proficiency readers. These findings provide evidence that bilingual LMs capture aspects of cross-linguistic influence, and that such influence is present in L2 reading behavior.

Thu 22 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Reading in a second language is often influenced by a person’s first language, but usual language models can’t capture this effect. The authors show that bilingual language models, trained on both a reader’s first and second language, better predict how people read in their second language. This improvement is strongest for readers who have an intermediate level of skill and when their first and second languages share writing styles. The work suggests that these models reflect how the first language affects reading in the second language.
Open → 2610.31620v1

Human reading times reveal gaps in language model memory processing

STRUCTURALCOST: A controlled reading time dataset for modeling human sentence processing difficulty

Abstract: We introduce STRUCTURALCOST, a self-paced reading dataset of 475 participants and 40,800 observations isolating the processing cost of long-distance subject-verb dependency resolution. We replicate a low-powered psycholinguistic finding at NLP scale, namely that human reading times at the main verb increase with dependency length, driven by syntactic embedding beyond linear distance. Different language models -- spanning n-gram models, SSMs, and transformers -- partially mirror this graded difficulty profile, yet underestimate the integration cost humans incur, with a gap that persists across architectures and model sizes. This suggests these models capture the predictive component of human processing but not the full integration cost that working memory imposes. STRUCTURALCOST provides data needed to drive progress toward evaluating the cognitive plausibility of language models.

Tue 6 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
People take longer to read sentences when the connection between the subject and verb is more complex, especially because of embedded phrases. The authors collected a large dataset showing this effect clearly using many people's reading times. They tested computer language models and found these models notice some difficulties but miss the extra challenge humans experience with memory. This dataset can help improve how computers understand sentences to match human thinking better.
Open → 2610.08208v1

Neural network models how context shapes memory and predictions

A neural network that maintains and retrieves memories based on context

Abstract: Every day, people continuously infer situational context and adjust the way they understand and remember the world. Context, signaled by the prefrontal cortex, is known to modulate working memory and episodic memory, but the algorithmic understanding of this modulation remains limited. Here, we train a recurrent neural network (RNN), augmented with an episodic memory buffer, to infer context using Bayesian inference as it continuously makes predictions of upcoming scenes while watching naturalistic movies. When the inferred context modulates the RNN's recurrent connectivity (the basis of working memory) in a low-rank manner, the model's activity patterns best match neural responses in human participants who watched the same movies during fMRI. Context also modulates episodic memory retrieval, such that the model retrieves memories based on not only content similarity but also context similarity. This is implemented as a key-value system with self-attention, designed to additionally encode context and retrieve context-congruent memories. The resulting model not only better resembles human brain representations but also learns to retrieve memories like humans much faster than a model without context modulation. Together, our findings suggest a computational mechanism by which context modulates information maintenance and long-term memory retrieval in naturalistic environments.

Tue 29 SeptArtificial IntelligenceNeural and Evolutionary Computing
The gist
People use context all the time to understand and remember things better. The authors trained a type of neural network that watches movies and guesses what will happen next, while also figuring out the
Open → 2609.37791v1