Papers for

cognitive computing developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Language models identify key features for concept learning quickly

An Algorithmic Account of Few-Shot Concept Induction in Language Models

Abstract: Both models and minds not only encode features that describe an entity, but can specifically represent which features of that entity are relevant for a given context. This core capability underlies in-context learning in language models and a variety of cognitive phenomena in minds, yet it is unclear how intelligent systems identify and promote relevant features. In this work, we propose Amortized Direction Accentuation (ADA), an algorithmic hypothesis that provides an explanation for how relevance is determined in the context of few-shot concept induction --- the ability to infer a latent concept from a small number of positive examples. Under ADA, concept induction proceeds by forming a summary representation of the examples in a feature space that is shaped by amortized knowledge about which features tend to be useful for finding commonalities between items. We investigate and validate ADA in language models using a few-shot concept induction task. This work provides a novel perspective on the mechanisms supporting contextualization in language models and a promising hypothesis for a core aspect of cognition.

Mon 26 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Figuring out what features matter when learning something new from just a few examples is hard for both humans and AI. The authors propose a method called Amortized Direction Accentuation (ADA) that helps language models focus on the important parts of examples to understand the concept behind them. This method uses prior knowledge about which features often matter to create a summary that highlights what is relevant. They tested ADA on tasks where models had to learn concepts from few examples and found it helps explain how models and minds might do this. This could improve how AI understands contexts and learns quickly from limited data.
Open → 2610.35533v1

Unify language models to better predict reading times in psycholinguistics

Revisiting the Estimation of Unigram Surprisal in Computational Psycholinguistics

Abstract: Contextual and unigram surprisal are standard predictors of reading time in computational psycholinguistics. While contextual surprisal is typically derived from neural language models, unigram surprisal is usually obtained from independent corpus counts. Although both quantities are deterministic functionals of a single underlying distribution---capturing conditional and marginal structure respectively---this practice breaks their probabilistic link and may introduce estimation error from the mismatch. We propose three principles for estimating unigram surprisal in psycholinguistic research, including the requirement that both quantities be derived from the same language model. We operationalize this principle by introducing a Monte Carlo estimator of unigram surprisal from a language model, along with a marginalized variant that has lower variance empirically. When unigram surprisal is re-estimated under this unified framework, we find evidence that predictors change in their predictive contribution to reading time. We also confirm prior findings that frequency can be a stronger predictor of processing effort than contextual surprisal under this unified framework.

Tue 13 OctComputation and Language
The gist
How quickly people read words can depend on how surprising those words are. Usually, researchers measure this surprise in two ways using different methods—one looks at words alone and the other at words in context. The authors show that measuring both surprises from the same language model avoids errors and provides better insight. They introduce a new method to do this and find that word frequency still remains an important factor in understanding reading effort.
Open → 2610.18414v1

Language model surprisal predicts chinese reading times differently by corpus

A Systematic Analysis of the Predictive Power of LM Surprisal in Reading Chinese

Abstract: This study analyzes the predictive power of LM-derived, token-level surprisal on Mandarin Chinese reading times. We first propose the Shortest Matching Sequence (SMS), an alignment scheme that maps between the word segmentation assumed by eye-tracking corpora and the LMs' subword tokenization, as the two tokenizations often disagree in the context of Mandarin Chinese. Then, using a suite of Chinese-Pythia models (14M-1.4B) trained on scratch with 30B tokens, we examine how well surprisal predicts first fixation duration, gaze duration, and total reading time in three paragraph-level eye-tracking corpora of Mandarin Chinese (GECO-CN, HKP, and MECO). Contrary to previous null findings, our results show that surprisal is predictive of Chinese reading times. However, whether predictive power scales with model size and the amount of training is corpus-specific: bigger models predict better in GECO-CN, whereas inverse scaling emerges in HKP and, at the largest sizes, in MECO. Subsequently, we tested one possible explanation for the inverse scaling in HKP and found that checkpoints whose surprisal remains closer to $n$-gram statistics are better predictors of reading. All in all, the predictive power of surprisal on Chinese reading time measurements is corpus-specific, which cautions against drawing scaling conclusions from a single corpus.

Sun 4 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
This study looked at how well language models can predict how long Mandarin Chinese speakers spend reading words. The authors dealt with challenges because the way words are split in Chinese changes depending on the system used. They found that the ability of language models to predict reading times varies depending on which text data is used and that bigger models don't always do better. Some models that are closer to traditional word statistics predicted reading times better in certain cases. Overall, the results show it’s important to test on multiple types of Chinese text to understand how language models relate to reading behavior.
Open → 2610.04898v1