cognitive assessment developers

Abstract: Understanding how humans reason -- and how reasoning responses vary across tasks and individuals -- remains a core challenge for modeling and explanation in cognitive science. We investigate the stability of response patterns within reasoners and whether variation in these patterns can be used to predict learning effects. We introduce a formal, geometry-based method to quantify distances between individual reasoning patterns and their internal variability, grounded in heuristic theories. The proposed framework is tested against experimental data via generalized linear mixed-effects models and clustering, where we find that our proposed variation measure interacts with correctness to predict performance gains. Moreover, we find that reasoning patterns are stable over time within the same reasoner. The method is general enough to be applied to other reasoning domains.

Abstract: Mapping resting-state brain organization to individual differences in cognitive ability remains a major challenge in population neuroinformatics. Although deep learning enables flexible modeling of brain connectivity, limited interpretability restricts its scientific and clinical utility. To address this objective, we developed an explainable deep learning framework based on sparse projected residual networks to predict fluid, crystallized, and total intelligence from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in 5,285 participants from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. We incorporated three complementary explainability methods (Integrated Gradients, Gradient Shapley Additive Explanations, and Occlusion) to interpret model behavior. The framework outperformed existing approaches, achieving Pearson correlations of 0.44, 0.58, and 0.56 for fluid, crystallized, and total intelligence, respectively, corresponding to predictive improvements of 6 to 9 percent. All three explainability methods produced near-identical feature rankings (pairwise rank correlations greater than 0.99). Consensus maps revealed a dual-layered functional architecture where primary predictive hubs localized within canonical systems, while the strongest global predictive pathways frequently bypassed these hubs through distributed, long-range relay connections. These findings suggest that intelligence emerges from the interaction between localized computational hubs and distributed communication pathways. Ultimately, these normative network architectures provide clinical reference maps to detect individual deviations, supporting earlier diagnosis, cognitive subtype stratification, and treatment monitoring in atypical neurodevelopment.