Papers for

cloud quantum service providers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Verifiable sampling ensures trust in delegated quantum machine learning

Verifiable Sampling for Delegated Generative Quantum Machine Learning

Abstract: Generative machine learning has shown remarkable results across a wide range of interdisciplinary tasks, motivating significant efforts toward Quantum Generative Models as a path to beyond-classical performance, given their capability of generating classically intractable distributions. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to securely delegating such computations to a powerful remote quantum server. In this work, we propose a blind and verifiable protocol for sampling that can be used for the inference phase of such quantum models. Such a protocol inherits blindness from Universal Blind Quantum Computing and achieves verifiability by exploiting known approaches based on trapification schemes. Alongside, to delegate the training phase, we discuss an extension of the previously proposed verifiable end-to-end Delegated Variational Quantum Algorithms (Inajetovic et al., Phys. Rev. Research, 2026). Beyond the usual Accept/Abort outcome characterizing verification protocols, the sampling protocol for inference also provides, even against a malicious server, an estimation of the amount of corrupted generated samples, i.e., a fine-grained feature describing the quality of the outcome connecting verification protocols and application-level benchmarking.

Fri 9 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Machine learning models can create new data, but some models might be too powerful to run on regular computers. Quantum computers offer a way to run these models, but often people need to use someone else’s quantum computer remotely. The authors propose a method that lets users check if the output from a remote quantum computer is trustworthy, even if the computer tries to cheat. This approach not only trusts or rejects the results but also estimates how many outputs might be corrupted, giving a more detailed measure of result quality.
Open → 2610.13211v1

Quantum states enable controlled cloning with special keys

Quantum Fire with Delegated Cloning

Abstract: Quantum fire is a recently introduced cryptographic primitive consisting of efficiently preparable quantum states, called \emph{flames}, that admit efficient cloning but resist efficient telegraphing, namely reconstruction via classical communication without preshared entanglement. In all prior constructions of quantum fire, cloning is a public operation that requires no separate key and every holder of a flame state can clone it. For applications to access control, however, an issuer may wish to delegate cloning to designated quantum servers while withholding this capability from other flame holders. To address this, we introduce \emph{delegatable quantum fire}, in which cloning requires a separate key. We give two constructions in the classical-oracle model. Our first construction uses a classical secret key which enables cloning, and any user with the entire key may clone successfully. Our second construction, which we call \emph{torch-fire}, uses quantum cloning keys, called \emph{torches}, which enable cloning while remaining unaffected in the process but cannot otherwise be split or delegated to enable additional cloning. An efficient adversary given $m$ torches cannot, except with negligible probability, enable more than $m$ noncommunicating parties to each clone a fresh, independently issued challenge flame. The adversary may jointly process its resources before separating the parties and distribute arbitrarily entangled registers among them. Both constructions are in the oracle model, relying on public classical oracles that allow queries in quantum superposition.

Fri 2 OctCryptography and Security
The gist
Some special quantum states called flames can be copied easily by anyone who has one, but can’t be recreated using just classical communication. The authors introduce a new way to control who can clone these flames by requiring a special key. Their first method uses a classical key that lets its holder clone flames, while the second uses quantum keys that can’t be copied or shared. This means only designated users can clone the flames, improving control over the process.
Open → 2610.03593v1