Papers for
clinical training teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Simulation training improves language models for psychiatric interviews
Training language models in simulation for psychiatric intake
Abstract: In psychiatric practice, the clinical intake interview remains a primary diagnostic instrument, requiring the clinician to establish rapport while disentangling complex, overlapping presentations. Here, we show that multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL) in simulation environments improves language model performance on structured text-based psychiatric intake, spanning history-taking, differential diagnosis, and initial management planning. In a randomized, double-blind crossover study ($N = 60$ matched scenario pairs, 120 encounters) comparing the RL-trained agent against its identically prompted base model, 32 board-certified psychiatrists role-played standardized patients while a separate panel of 15 independent, board-certified psychiatrists scored the de-identified transcripts. The trained agent outperformed the base model in 76.7% of matched scenario pairs ($p < 0.0001$), with gains on an adapted clinical-examination rubric ($d_z = 0.77$, $p < 0.0001$), patient-centered communication (82.0% vs. 65.2%, $p < 0.001$), and differential diagnosis appropriateness (68.3% vs. 33.3%, $p < 0.001$). Across 127 psychiatrist-validated simulated intake scenarios, the trained agent nearly doubled its base model's clinical rubric score (0.706 vs. 0.379; composite reward 0.564 vs. 0.294, $p < 0.0001$). To systematically probe conversational safety, we established two Delphi-consensus taxonomies, of clinical safety risks and relational competencies, from which 256 challenging adversarial presentations were derived; we find that training in simulation environments more than halved under-triage of acute safety risks (12.9% vs. 30.5%, $p < 0.0001$). Simulation environments thus provide a controlled testbed for training and stress-testing psychiatric conversational agents, with gains that transferred to psychiatrist-enacted encounters, though residual gaps require safeguards and clinician oversight.
Dual-agent approach improves synthetic medical consultation dialogues
Decoupling Patient Personas and Clinical Workflows: A Dual-Agent Approach to Realistic Medical Dialogue Generation
Abstract: Pre-consultation medical dialogues are essential for collecting comprehensive patient information, but are costly to obtain at scale due to privacy and ethical constraints. Existing LLM-based synthesis methods often rely on prompt engineering or rigid rules, limiting their ability to balance clinical relevance with realistic patient diversity. We propose CoRPS-Dial, a controllable dual-agent framework for pre-consultation medical dialogue synthesis that integrates patient personas with guideline-aligned clinical workflow rules. CoRPS-Dial generates dialogues through interactions between a persona-driven patient agent and a process-guided doctor agent, followed by post-hoc quality control for role consistency, workflow completeness, and textual consistency. Experiments on coronary heart disease demonstrate that CoRPS-Dial improves alignment between synthetic and real dialogues in information coverage, clinical compliance, and dialogue naturalness. Downstream fine-tuning experiments further confirm the utility of the generated synthetic data for medical dialogue tasks. These results highlight the effectiveness of CoRPS-Dial for clinically grounded and controllable medical dialogue synthesis.
CasCVS-Net improves safety view detection in gallbladder surgery
CasCVS-Net: A Staged Multi-Task Cascade for Critical View of Safety Assessment
Abstract: Automated assessment of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires both recognition of the three CVS criteria and anatomical grounding in small, rare, and often occluded hepatocystic structures. Learning-based methods differ in the anatomical information they use, from image-level classification to detection, segmentation, or graph-based reasoning, yet grounding the safety-critical anatomy remains the main bottleneck. We propose CasCVS-Net, a staged multi-task cascade that jointly performs object detection, semantic segmentation, and CVS assessment, trained on the Endoscapes dataset. The model couples the tasks through predicted anatomy: predicted boxes guide segmentation, and predicted masks provide region-level features for CVS classification, so CVS assessment at inference uses only model predictions rather than ground-truth annotations. To reduce optimisation instability in this coupled setting, training progresses from detection to detection-segmentation and then to the full three-task cascade, followed by task-wise fine-tuning. Evaluation on the public unseen test set shows that CasCVS-Net improves over matched single-task baselines on all three tasks, achieving 32.0 detection mAP, 46.8 semantic mIoU, 15.3 rare-anatomy mIoU, and 67.2 CVS mAP. It outperforms the state-of-the-art LG-CVS and SV2LSTG by 6.3% and 4.5% relative CVS mAP, respectively, corresponding to 4.0 and 2.9 mAP points. These results show that staged task coupling through predicted boxes and masks improves anatomical grounding for CVS assessment, particularly for rare hepatocystic structures.