Papers for
clinical radiology teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Deep learning estimates brain myelin maps from standard mri scans
Retrospective macromolecular pool fraction mapping from conventional clinical MRI: a physics-guided self-supervised deep learning framework
Abstract: Macromolecular pool fraction (MPF) is a quantitative imaging biomarker sensitive to myelin integrity and other changes in tissue macromolecular content, but specialized acquisitions and reconstruction methods limit its use in large-scale studies. We present a physics-guided, self-supervised deep learning framework for retrospectively estimating MPF directly from conventional clinical brain MRI ($T_1$-weighted, $T_2$-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) without paired quantitative reference scans. The framework embeds an analytical two-pool magnetization transfer signal model that related sequence-averaged radiofrequency transmit power to apparent longitudinal relaxation. To accommodate heterogeneous clinical protocols, the network conditions intermediate features on acquisition parameters via adaptive instance normalization. It was trained and evaluated on a multisite, multivendor, multiprotocol dataset of 7,705 MRI sessions (3 T). Across 1,237 test sessions, mean MPF was $0.182 \pm 0.007$ in white matter and $0.144 \pm 0.009$ in gray matter, with limited variation across vendor-by-protocol groups (between-group coefficient of variation: 2.65% and 5.63%, respectively). In 70 sessions with demyelinating-disease labels, MPF was 35.6% lower in segmented lesions than in normal-appearing white matter. MPF maps from two different clinical protocols acquired in a healthy volunteer showed a mean voxel-wise absolute percentage difference of 7.7% and a concordance correlation coefficient of $0.888$, indicating good cross-protocol consistency. These results suggest that magnetization transfer-informed self-supervised learning enables stable MPF mapping from conventional clinical MRI, providing a scalable approach to investigate demyelinating pathology in both existing imaging archives and prospectively acquired conventional clinical scans without dedicated qMT acquisitions.
Compact model improves 3T to 7T MRI image synthesis with fewer resources
DGCM-SSFA: Dual-Granularity Cross-Modulation and Sparse Strip Frequency Attention for Efficient 3T-to-7T MRI Synthesis
Abstract: Synthesizing high-fidelity 7T MRI from routinely acquired 3T scans offers a practical pathway to enhanced neuroimaging without the prohibitive cost of ultra-high-field scanners. While existing deep learning approaches have achieved promising results, state-of-the-art methods typically rely on either large-scale architectures exceeding 45 million parameters or computationally intensive ensemble strategies, limiting their practicality in resource-constrained clinical environments. In this work, we propose a compact multi-domain attention framework, termed DGCM-SSFA, that achieves competitive synthesis quality with only 11M parameters. The proposed architecture integrates two complementary modules into a U-Net Transformer backbone. First, a Dual-Granularity Cross-Modulated Feature Modulator (DGCM) is embedded at multiple hierarchical levels to enhance local edge and texture details through Sobel-guided spatial attention and depthwise frequency-aware channel attention with cross-branch gating. Second, a Sparse Strip Frequency Attention (SSFA) module at the bottleneck captures global spatial context via strip-pooled attention with near-linear complexity, while simultaneously performing FFT-based spectral modulation in the frequency domain. These two modules operate synergistically with the backbone's native channel attention, forming a triple-granularity feature refinement pipeline. Extensive experiments on the UNC and BNU 3T-to-7T MRI datasets across T1w and T2w modalities demonstrate that DGCM-SSFA achieves strong structural fidelity, attaining an SSIM of 0.8431 on BNU T2w---approaching the best benchmark value of 0.8624---and 0.8100 on BNU T1w, while using substantially fewer parameters than Transformer-based alternatives such as ResViT (123.4M) and FS-RWKV (45.4M).
X-Ragent improves chest X-ray analysis by selecting valid evidence
X-Ragent: Tool-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Evidence-Grounded Chest X-Ray Reasoning
Abstract: Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation often requires integrating visual findings with task-specific evidence rather than relying on direct visual recognition alone. While tool-augmented medical agents can supply such evidence via external modules, they often lack explicit mechanisms for learning when auxiliary evidence is needed and for preventing inapplicable quantitative evidence from entering diagnostic reasoning. To address this, we propose X-Ragent, a post-training framework for tool-augmented reinforcement learning that decouples learned auxiliary-evidence seeking from validity-gated quantitative measurement acquisition for evidence-grounded CXR reasoning. We construct Rad-CoT, a 7.7K-sample corpus combining causally ordered tool-augmented trajectories with report-style diagnostic reasoning, and use it to initialize Qwen3-VL-8B via agentic supervised fine-tuning (SFT). We then optimize the policy with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using an accuracy-gated reward that applies process-level terms for measurement consistency and auxiliary-tool cost only to correct trajectories, preventing plausible process behavior from compensating for an incorrect diagnosis. Across three CXR benchmarks, X-Ragent achieves the strongest results, including an 8.6-point improvement on the fully held-out ChestAgentBench. By seeking evidence selectively and admitting only valid measurements, X-Ragent supports more faithful and evidence-grounded CXR reasoning.
Brain tumor scans get more reliable even when some parts are missing
Missing Modality-Aware Calibration for Trustworthy Brain Tumor Segmentation
Abstract: Multimodal brain tumor segmentation typically leverages multiple MRI modalities, yet incomplete modality acquisition is common in clinical practice due to protocol heterogeneity and scan failures. Although recent methods maintain segmentation accuracy under missing modality conditions, they frequently overlook prediction reliability, leading to miscalibrated confidence estimates that hinder clinical adoption. Existing calibration techniques are largely modality-agnostic or assume that prediction difficulty decreases monotonically as additional modalities become available. However, in brain tumor segmentation, prediction difficulty depends primarily on which modalities are absent rather than how many, leading to combination-specific and spatially heterogeneous calibration errors. To address this, we propose Missing Modality-Aware Local Temperature Scaling (MMA-LTS), a post-hoc voxel-wise confidence calibration method. It estimates a spatially adaptive temperature field conditioned on a modality-availability learnable token and a voxel-wise difficulty score. Experiments on BraTS 2020 and FeTS 2024 show that MMA-LTS improves calibration while preserving the segmentation accuracy of state-of-the-art models across diverse missing-modality scenarios, thereby enhancing trustworthiness toward clinical deployment.
Fusion of lung ultrasound and clinical data improves tuberculosis screening accuracy
How well do routinely collected demographic and clinical variables aid point-of-care lung ultrasound TB classification
Abstract: We consider the fusion of lung ultrasound images with routinely-collected clinical and demographic data for the purpose of automated tuberculosis (TB) screening using deep-learning. Such deep-learning based screening tools for TB could meaningfully support the health care system in Africa, where the burden of disease is severe and resources are constrained. Beginning with an established ResNet baseline for classification of lung ultrasound images, which achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.91 [0.86,0.96] (95% CI), we consider the incorporation of the clinical and demographic data using three fusion approaches. We find that a simple average-based fusion of the output scores of separately-trained image and clinical data classifiers consistently matches or outperforms a more complex approach where the data is fused earlier and a combined classifier is trained. Fusing the image and the clinical classifiers in this way leads to a classifier with an overall AUROC of 0.95 [0.91,0.99] (specificity of 0.76 at sensitivity 0.93) which is an improvement of 4% absolute over the image-only baseline. We also find that greedy feature selection can be used to reduce the number of clinical and demographic inputs without sacrificing classification performance. Finally, when we differentiate between clinical and demographic data that are self-reported, that require some basic measurement or calculation, and that require a point-of-care (POC) test, we find the inclusion of the POC tests included in this study to be of minimal benefit to classification performance. We conclude that the incorporation of routinely-collected clinical and demographic data is a promising way to improve the performance of lung ultrasound based automatic classification.
Misalignment biases supervised training of synthetic CT images
When Misalignment Becomes Supervision: Structured Label Noise in Supervised Synthetic CT Generation
Abstract: Supervised synthetic CT (sCT) generation is commonly trained and evaluated as voxel-wise regression against registered reference CT images. In practice, MRI-CT and CBCT-CT pairs are aligned through registration procedures that leave residual misalignments. These residuals are not independent intensity noise but spatially coherent geometric discrepancies that act as structured label noise. We investigate how this registration-induced bias affects supervised MRI-to-CT and CBCT-to-CT synthesis on 1,784 paired patients covering five anatomical regions. Voxel-wise scores strongly depend on the consistency between the registration used to build the training targets and the one used for evaluation: models score best when both conventions match, showing that networks partly learn the geometric convention of the registration pipeline and that standard metrics reward it. Training on more anatomically consistent registrations reduces prediction variability and improves out-of-distribution robustness, and CT-only controls show that registration alone produces metric errors in the range of top challenge submissions. To mitigate the limits of voxel-wise supervision, we introduce a perceptual loss computed in the feature space of a pretrained Segment Anything encoder. Compared with MAE-only and VGG-based objectives, it improves downstream segmentation and yields sharper, more structurally coherent sCT. Perceptual and voxel-wise metrics disagree under imperfect alignment and agree when the evaluation geometry is reliable. These results identify registration-induced bias as a central confounder in supervised sCT generation and argue for complementing voxel-wise agreement with anatomy-oriented evaluation criteria.
Cardiac MRI scanner system generates instant detailed heart reports
ORION-CMR: On-scanner Reporting with Integrated Foundation Model for End-to-End Cardiac MRI Analysis and Interpretation
Abstract: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides comprehensive cardiac assessment but remains underutilized because of the complexity of acquisition, post-processing, and interpretation. Existing artificial intelligence (AI) methods address isolated tasks, limiting clinical integration. We present ORION-CMR (On-scanner Reporting with Integrated fOunda-tioN Model), the first clinically evaluated scanner-native end-to-end CMR foundation model. Pretrained on 12,896,733 CMR images from 9,258 studies, ORION-CMR performs sequence classification, ventricular function assessment, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) detection, binary and multiclass disease classification, and local large language model-based report generation in approximately 90 seconds. The framework. was evaluated on public benchmarks and clinically validated in a multi-vendor cohort of 68 subjects with normal examinations, congenital heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, and myocardial infarction. ORION-CMR outperformed supervised baselines and the previously published CMR foundation model (CMR-FM), achieving state-of-the-art performance for LGE classification and scar segmentation. Clinical evaluation achieved an AUC of 0.96 for normal-versus abnormal classification and 0.88 for multiclass disease classification, while generated reports demonstrated 81.4% agreement with expert interpretation. These results demonstrate the feasibility of real-time scanner-native AI-assisted CMR analysis and automated report generation.