Papers for

clinical laboratory technicians

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Accurate sperm and impurity detection achieved with compact YOLO model

SpermYOLO: A Coordinated YOLO-Based Detector for Accurate and Efficient Sperm and Impurity Detection in Microscopic Images

Abstract: Accurate sperm detection is essential for computer-assisted semen analysis, yet it remains challenging in microscopic images due to dense distributions, visually similar artifacts, and sperm-like impurities. In this paper, we propose SpermYOLO, a coordinated and compact YOLOv11-derived framework for joint sperm and impurity detection in microscopic images. SpermYOLO introduces four architectural improvements: C3k2-IDB for channel-wise discriminative feature extraction, D2SEM for spatial--spectral semantic enhancement, MFM for adaptive multi-scale feature fusion, and the DESD Head for detail-enhanced shared prediction. Experiments on the SVIA semen microscopic imaging benchmark show that SpermYOLO achieves 97.2\% sperm AP and 75.4\% impurity AP, outperforming generic detectors, dedicated sperm detection models, and improved YOLO variants. Compared with the baseline model, SpermYOLO improves sperm AP, impurity AP, $\mathrm{mAP}_{50}$, and $\mathrm{mAP}_{50:95}$ by 1.6, 10.0, 5.8, and 2.7 percentage points, respectively, while preserving a lightweight model scale. Cross-scene evaluation on the SDTB testicular-biopsy microscopy benchmark shows that SpermYOLO remains effective with extremely small sperm targets and complex tissue backgrounds, achieving the highest $\mathrm{mAP}_{50}$ and $\mathrm{mAP}_{50:95}$ of 74.8\% and 31.2\%, respectively. Ablation studies and qualitative analyses further support these improvements by demonstrating the contributions of the proposed modules and showing more focused feature response patterns than the baseline model. These findings suggest that SpermYOLO is an effective and efficient approach for sperm detection in challenging microscopic imaging scenarios.

Sun 13 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Finding individual sperms in microscope images is hard because sperm are crowded together and impurities look similar. The authors created a lightweight computer program called SpermYOLO that can spot sperms and impurities more accurately than previous models. They tested it on different image collections and showed it works well even with tiny sperm and complex backgrounds. The new design uses smart techniques to focus on important details, which helps the program perform better while staying efficient.
Open → 2609.14278v1

Multi-label classification improves blood cell and aggregate identification

Multi-label versus multi-class classification of blood cells and their aggregates in microfluidic channels

Abstract: Deformability cytometry (DC) is a type of imaging flow cytometry, which uses a camera-equipped device to measure cellular stiffness in addition to other cellular properties at high throughput. Cellular properties such as area and elongation can identify cell types, but this requires prior knowledge of distinguishing properties and cannot be applied to clinically important cell aggregates. Using DC data, we evaluated conventional multi-class (MC) classification and introduced a multi-label (ML) approach for identifying blood cells and their aggregates. In particular, an ML classifier can simultaneously assign multiple cell-type labels to a single imaged event. We show that, unlike MC classification, ML classification can identify cell aggregates not represented in the training data. It also avoids the need for exhaustive, strictly defined aggregate labels, thereby simplifying and speeding up annotation. Since automated blood analyzers do not reliably analyze cell aggregates, our approach may help address this clinical gap.

Mon 7 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMachine Learning
The gist
Blood analyzers often struggle to correctly identify groups of cells called aggregates. The authors compared two ways to classify images of blood cells: one that assigns a single cell type per image and another that allows multiple labels for cell aggregates. Their multi-label method can recognize cell groups even if the training data didn’t include those specific combinations. This approach reduces the need for detailed labeling and could improve clinical analysis of blood samples.
Open → 2609.07410v1