Papers for

clinical it teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Colonoscopy polyp tracking improves without manual bounding box labels

Annotation-Free Representation Learning for Polyp Retrieval in Colonoscopy Videos

Abstract: Colonoscopy is inherently comparative: reliable visual assessment of polyps often depends on complementary views acquired under different viewpoints and imaging conditions. Retrieving such views requires polyp tracklet representations, which recent contrastive methods learn from temporal cues but still build from manually annotated bounding boxes. We propose an annotation-free framework that constructs tracklet views directly from raw colonoscopy videos, enabling temporal self-supervised learning on full-procedure videos, including frames without visible polyps. On REAL-Colon, our method achieves state-of-the-art results on tracklet retrieval and re-identification, outperforming both self-supervised and supervised baselines. We then introduce few-shot polyp retrieval, a task closer to clinical use, where a few observations of a target polyp are used to retrieve its remaining tracklets: with only two examples, our method surpasses most competing methods given ten. Finally, we show that a modest number of unlabeled procedures suffices for competitive performance, making on-site model development more practical. Code is available at https://github.com/lparolari/freerep.

Thu 29 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Colonoscopy videos show polyps from different angles, helping doctors understand them better. But to find and track the same polyp in many frames, computers usually need human-drawn boxes around polyps, which is slow and costly. The authors developed a method that learns to find and follow polyps over time using raw videos alone, with no need for these labels. This approach works better than existing methods and can find more images of the same polyp even from just a few examples.
Open → 2610.39648v1

Multi-agent system predicts knee osteoarthritis progression with interpretable evidence

OA-MAP: Evidence-Grounded Multi-Agent Multimodal Framework for Interpretable Knee Osteoarthritis Progression

Abstract: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression prediction can support patient monitoring, requiring the integration of multimodal data and multidomain expertise. Moreover, isolated risk estimates provide limited insight underlying a prediction. To automate the progression assessment workflow and reduce manual effort while providing interpretable findings and supporting evidence, we present OA-MAP, an autonomous multi-agent framework for evidence-grounded assessment of structural and pain progression in KOA. The system incorporates modality-specific agents including MRI, X-ray, and clinical agents, together with a coordinator agent. This framework can autonomously recruit specialist agents, select tools for prediction and analysis, and retrieve literature as external evidence based on user request and available patient information. An uncertainty-informed human-in-the-loop mechanism enables clinicians to review and correct intermediate findings, triggering recomputation of affected results. We evaluate the prediction models using 600 participants from the FNIH Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium cohort. On the test set of 100 participants, the fusion models achieve AUROCs of 0.80 for structural progression and 0.68 for pain progression. A case study illustrates how OA-MAP combines risk estimates with intermediate findings, cross-modal conflicts, literature support, and uncertainty indicators to support interactive review.

Thu 8 OctArtificial IntelligenceMultiagent Systems
The gist
Knee osteoarthritis is a disease that worsens over time, and doctors want better ways to predict its progress. The authors created OA-MAP, a computer system that uses different types of medical images and patient information to estimate how the disease might develop. It explains its predictions by showing evidence from scans, clinical tests, and scientific papers, and lets doctors check and adjust the results. Tests with real patient data showed that the system can predict worsening knee damage and pain with reasonable accuracy.
Open → 2610.12134v1