Papers for
chip security engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Cooling chips disables clock sensors without erasing secrets
Chypothermia: Clock Freezing for Static Side-channel Attacks
Abstract: Static side-channel attacks, which exploit halted-clock conditions to extract sensitive information, pose an increasing threat to chip security. To counter these attacks, various defenses have been proposed that monitor for abnormal clock behavior and trigger the clearing of sensitive data when clock anomalies are detected. In this work, we demonstrate that exposing a chip to cryogenic temperatures interferes with on-chip mixed-signal components, responsible for signal sensing and generation. Based on this observation, we develop Chypothermia, an attack that, without any electrical tampering with the system, disables the target clock sensor, the clock generation circuit, and the voltage sensors, while preserving the secret data. While effective at halting the clock, cooling is a slow process and, on its own, is often insufficient against systems equipped with temperature sensors designed to detect thermal anomalies. To bypass these protections, we combine Chypothermia with Chypnosis (Mitard et al., IEEE SP 2026) and show that, even within a moderately low-temperature operating range, this combination can halt the clock while evading detection. We implement Chypothermia on multiple FPGA/SoC platforms and demonstrate successful disabling of both soft-IP and hard-IP sensor implementations. Finally, we apply Chypothermia to the alert handler of the OpenTitan root of trust, which incorporates a state-of-the-art clock sensor, and show that the attack evades detection and prevents key zeroization. Finally, we introduce and implement an FPGA-compatible self-heating sensor as a countermeasure and demonstrate its robustness against Chypothermia.
Protocol choices strongly affect hardware trojan detection accuracy
Protocol effects on feature-based hardware-Trojan detection across Trust-Hub families
Abstract: Trust-Hub reuses host circuits: several files differ mainly in the inserted Trojan. When gates from sibling variants enter both training and test folds, a detector can benefit from host logic it has already seen. We measure that effect instead of proposing another classifier. The corpus contains 49,124 gates from 16 netlists grouped into five host families. We left the parser, 36 gate features, class weighting, model settings, threshold, and family-level aggregation unchanged and altered one choice: the test boundary. The three settings draw test gates from the pooled corpus, withhold a complete netlist, or withhold every variant of one host. The choice matters. Random forest records F1/AP of 0.914/0.978 with pooled gates, 0.636/0.851 with one netlist held out, and 0.460/0.577 with a host family held out. XGBoost falls from 0.946/0.976 to 0.464/0.544 across the same comparison. Logistic regression loses AP, although its fixed-threshold F1 is not monotonic. Each family shows the same pooled-to-family direction. Feature removal, repeated model and simulator seeds, score normalization, parser-related exclusions, and a smaller sample change the size of the gap without reversing it. Aggregation also matters: a gate-weighted average is dominated by the larger ISCAS files, so the headline values give each host family one vote. Bootstrap and jackknife summaries keep the gap positive, but their folds reuse training families. We treat the five family rows as descriptive evidence rather than independent trials. Five host families are too few for a population claim, and the experiment says nothing about transfer to a new cell library or an industrial design. It supports a narrower conclusion: sibling benchmark variants can inflate apparent transfer. Benchmarks with several variants of one host circuit should report family-aware holdouts and all five family results beside pooled scores.