Papers for

chemical data annotation teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Ai systems struggle to understand chemical placeholders in patents

R-GroundBench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for R-Group Groundingin Markush Molecular Editing

Abstract: Recent advances in AI for scientific discovery enable molecular understandingand design, yet reasoning over incomplete chemical representations remainsunclear.Markush structures, which encode molecular families through variable R-groupplaceholders (\textit{R\textsubscript{1}}, \textit{R\textsubscript{2}}, \textit{X}, etc.), are ubiquitous in pharmaceutical patents and requiregrounding across molecular, textual, and chemical information.However, existing molecule-language benchmarks focus on fully specifiedmolecules, leaving R-group grounding largely unevaluated.We introduce R-GroundBench:, a diagnostic benchmark built from real patent Markushstructures, featuring a Multiple-Choice (VQA) track with controlled difficultyand modality splits, and an open-ended Generation track.Our results reveal a substantial gap between recognition andmolecular grounding.While models achieve over 90\% accuracy on Easy VQA, performance drops to56--66\% on Hard VQA when shortcuts are controlled.Chemical-domain VLMs also remain unreliable, achieving only 25.7--46.2\% on HardVQA despite domain-specific pretraining.Moreover, Generation Exact Match remains below 20\% for most models and below8\% when visual input is required.These findings reveal that current AI systems lack reliable grounding andexecution for Markush editing, highlighting challenges for AI-drivenscientific discovery.

Wed 30 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Understanding special chemical diagrams called Markush structures is hard for AI. These diagrams use placeholders to represent different molecular groups, common in drug patents. The authors created a new test called R-GroundBench to see how well AI can identify and work with these placeholders. They found current AI models do very well on easy tasks but struggle a lot with harder, more realistic ones. This shows that AI still has a long way to go before it can reliably help with chemical design tasks involving these complex structures.
Open → 2610.00700v1