Papers for
cardiovascular imaging teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
PPCAR-Net reconstructs 3D coronary arteries from sparse X-rays fast
PPCAR-Net: Projection-Refined Parametric 3D Coronary Artery Reconstruction from Sparse X-ray Angiographic Views
Abstract: Sparse-view 3D coronary reconstruction commonly relies on cross-view correspondence and triangulation, which are vulnerable to vessel overlap and foreshortening, or on volumetric prediction followed by vascular-graph extraction, which does not directly provide centrelines and radii. We introduce PPCAR-Net, a projection-refined parametric coronary artery reconstruction network that directly predicts a branch-structured centreline-and-radius representation without explicit point matching, triangulation, or an intermediate volume. Given a variable number of segmented views, a coarse predictor combines frozen VGGT features with learned branch queries to estimate branch presence, B-spline centreline trajectories, and dense radius profiles. Projection-guided geometry and radius refiners then sample local evidence from the input views and apply residual corrections learned with 3D supervision. We evaluate representation fidelity and sparse-view reconstruction quantitatively and qualitatively. On simulated angiographic masks generated from CT-derived coronary anatomy, PPCAR-Net produces better connected artery reconstructions and achieves strong centreline accuracy, particularly for RCA, while maintaining competitive volumetric overlap. Coarse-to-fine inference takes 121 ms, enabling real-time reconstruction.
Left ventricular masks do not improve ejection fraction estimates
The segmentation ceiling: why explicit left-ventricular masks do not improve learned ejection-fraction regression
Abstract: Accurate estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) from echocardiography is central to cardiovascular care, and deep learning enables automated EF prediction from echocardiographic video. Because EF is clinically derived from left-ventricular (LV) volumes, a widely held intuition is that explicit LV segmentation should improve prediction. We introduce a quantitative criterion, the segmentation ceiling, that makes this testable: from EF as a normalized difference of end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, we derive in closed form how per-frame segmentation area error propagates into EF error, and thus the accuracy a mask must reach before it can improve on direct regression. Using EchoNet-Dynamic, a UniFormer-S backbone, and the empirically measured within-patient error correlation, the criterion places the break-even near 10% per-frame area error, whereas a representative segmenter operates at roughly 14%, above the ceiling. Consistent with this, four strategies for injecting segmentation or area information (a predicted-mask channel, end-diastolic/end-systolic clip sampling, and per-bin and amplitude area-consistency objectives) fail to beat a raw-video baseline; ground-truth masks help only through label leakage. Input representation thus not being the limit, we identify generalization as the practical lever: weight averaging with strong augmentation attains a test R^2 of 0.806 (MAE 4.08) under a matched dense-clip protocol, comparable to an R(2+1)D baseline (0.811) while tightening the validation-to-test gap. Finally, a heteroscedastic beta-NLL formulation yields informative, well-calibrated per-prediction uncertainty, larger for clinically harder low-EF cases, where Monte-Carlo dropout does not. The segmentation ceiling gives a concrete design criterion for when mask-guided EF estimation is worthwhile, plus a simple, uncertainty-aware recipe for EF regression.