Papers for

biotech protein engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Protein optimization improves multiple traits with modular diffusion steering

Multi-Objective Protein Optimization via Modular Diffusion Steering

Abstract: Protein engineering often requires improving several properties simultaneously, motivating the search for high-performing sequences that represent useful fitness tradeoffs. Discovering these sequences is challenging because the design space is combinatorially large and experimental campaigns often permit only a few rounds of batched measurements. We introduce \textit{MODS}, a modular framework for multi-objective protein optimization via inference-time diffusion steering. For each proposal, MODS samples augmented Chebyshev scalarization weights and a fitness-surrogate ensemble member to define a scalar steering reward. Varying the weights directs generation toward different objective tradeoffs, while varying ensemble members diversifies the predictions used for guidance. Because MODS expresses multi-objective acquisition through scalar rewards, it can be paired with different diffusion models and compatible steering procedures. After each evaluation batch, MODS updates the surrogates without retraining the generative model. We evaluate MODS on six protein optimization tasks using predictive oracles trained on experimental assay data, with two diffusion models and two steering procedures. MODS achieves competitive final hypervolume across all six tasks with both diffusion models, and substantially outperforms the best evaluated baseline on several tasks. Our results demonstrate a flexible and effective approach to multi-objective protein optimization with limited feedback.

Tue 20 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Designing proteins that work well in several ways at once is hard because there are so many possible protein sequences. The authors created a method called MODS that uses a smart sampling approach to guide protein design toward different tradeoffs between traits. MODS works by combining predictions from multiple models and adjusting goals to explore a variety of protein possibilities. It works with different underlying models and quickly updates its strategies without needing to relearn everything. When tested on several protein design problems, MODS matched or beat strong alternatives.
Open → 2610.28943v1

Protein volumetric model improves binding and design accuracy

From Surfaces to Volumes: Registered Geometry for Protein Representation Learning

Abstract: Existing protein geometry models typically represent molecular surfaces using local geometric features such as sampled points, normals, and curvature. While effective for capturing exposed molecular shape, these representations do not explicitly model the volumetric organization beneath the surface or provide a consistent coordinate system for residue-wise volumetric structure. We introduce Protein-TetSphere, a registered residue-wise volumetric representation for proteins. Each protein chain is tetrahedralized to obtain local volumetric regions associated with individual residues, which are then registered to a shared fixed-topology tetrahedral reference and represented in a common Laplacian basis. This registration establishes consistent volumetric coordinates across residues, enabling local three-dimensional deformation to be integrated with surface and chemical information in a multimodal protein representation. We evaluate Protein-TetSphere on ligand-binding pocket classification, protein--protein interface prediction, and de novo protein binder design. Across the three tasks, Protein-TetSphere improves ligand-binding pocket balanced accuracy from $0.795$ to $0.826$, Pinder-Pair/Site AUROC from $0.914/0.852$ to $0.932/0.866$, and binder-design success from $14.95\%$ to $19.90\%$ on the BoltzGen Challenge Set and from $27.62\%$ to $32.19\%$ at the ProtDBench backbone level. These results show that registered volumetric geometry provides complementary spatial information beyond molecular surfaces across protein recognition, interaction, and design.

Mon 28 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Proteins have complex 3D shapes that influence how they work and interact with other molecules. Existing models mainly look at protein surfaces, missing details about the inside volume and consistent coordinates for parts called residues. The authors created Protein-TetSphere, a new way to represent proteins using tiny tetrahedrons mapped to shared coordinates, capturing both surface and inside volume info. This new model improved predictions about binding sites, protein interactions, and designed protein binders compared to older methods.
Open → 2609.36277v1