Papers for

biometric device integrators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Compact vision models struggle with unknown iris spoofing attacks

Compact Vision Models for Iris Presentation Attack Detection under Presentation Attack Instrument Shift and Environmental Degradation

Abstract: Iris presentation attack detection (PAD) is security-critical when a subsystem that appears reliable during development encounters presentation attack instruments (PAIs) or acquisition conditions absent from validation data. We benchmark three compact scratch-trained computer-vision models, each with at most approximately 0.26 million trainable parameters, on the Notre Dame subset of LivDet-Iris 2017 under PAI-driven domain shift and environmental degradation. All models are trained without external pretraining or data augmentation and evaluated over five seeds. A validation-selected threshold is transferred unchanged to the known-attack, unknown-attack, corrupted, and pooled test partitions. From known to unknown attack presentations, Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate (APCER) increases by 17.11-30.47 percentage points and Detection Equal Error Rate (D-EER) increases by 7.38-12.73 percentage points. At the validation-selected threshold, ZACH-ViT obtains the lowest unknown-attack APCER (47.69 +/- 4.84%) and D-EER (38.87 +/- 0.93%), while Compact-TransMIL obtains the lowest Bona Fide Presentation Classification Error Rate (BPCER). ZACH-ViT also gives the lowest unknown-attack BPCER at an APCER limit of 10% (81.29 +/- 1.95%). The high absolute errors show that the comparative advantage of the best compact model does not constitute deployment readiness under unknown PAIs.

Thu 17 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionCryptography and Security
The gist
Iris recognition systems can be tricked by fake irises, which is a big security concern. The authors tested three small computer vision models designed to detect such attacks without relying on extra data or pretraining. They found that while these models work okay on known fake types, their accuracy drops a lot when facing new types of attacks or poor image quality. This shows that these compact models are not yet reliable enough for real-world iris security when encountering unknown spoofing techniques.
Open → 2609.20386v1