Papers for
battery engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
FlowBatt predicts battery health trajectories with low error
FlowBatt: Flow Matching for Probabilistic Battery Degradation Prediction
Abstract: Battery degradation remains a central challenge in the development and broad application of sustainable energy technologies. Accurate degradation prediction is challenging, as battery aging emerges from complex and heterogeneous interactions among cycling behavior, operating conditions, and cell chemistry. Existing machine-learning approaches typically focus on deterministic end-of-life predictions or modeling degradation curves within fixed chemistry settings, leaving probabilistic state of health (SOH) trajectory modeling across heterogeneous chemistries underexplored. We introduce FlowBatt, a use-inspired conditional generative framework that adapts flow matching with a diffusion transformer (DiT) backbone to battery degradation trajectory modeling. FlowBatt models full SOH trajectories as probabilistic degradation processes conditioned on early-cycle capacity data. To strengthen this conditioning pathway, we use explainable AI analysis to diagnose and improve the encoder that maps early-cycle capacity matrices into conditioning vectors. We evaluate FlowBatt on five public benchmark settings spanning diverse chemistries and aging conditions, comparing it with supervised and diffusion-based trajectory models as well as established baselines for remaining useful life (RUL) prediction under shared data splits. FlowBatt achieves the best trajectory-wise SOH prediction performance on all five datasets, with errors below 2.5%, and delivers competitive RUL prediction performance. By generating multiple plausible trajectories, FlowBatt provides empirical prediction intervals for battery degradation modeling. These results indicate that flow-matching-based trajectory modeling is a promising framework for probabilistic battery health prediction.
Electrochemical and thermal models improve 4680 battery cell understanding
Parameterisation of NMC and LFP 4680 cells for electrochemical and thermal modelling
Abstract: An electrochemical-thermal model of the 4680 cylindrical cell is presented: a Doyle-Fuller-Newman model of the electrode stack coupled to a two-node thermal balance of the roll and the can (a thermal DFN, TDFN), solved by an implicit finite-volume scheme. Two cells are parameterised from teardown geometry and open literature, with every value tagged by provenance: the Tesla NMC811/graphite tabless cell and the BYD FC4680 LiFePO4 multi-tab cell. The reaction heat is evaluated at the open-circuit potential of the particle-mean concentration, which restores the heat of mixing. Both sets are calibrated in the same way, with the test fixture identified from the measurement alone. Against the 1C and 2C charge test of Ank et al., the calibrated NMC set follows the mean can temperature within 0.52 and 1.46 K, with a contact heat of 0.94 mOhm matching the authors' estimate for their holder. For the LFP cell, 1C and 2C discharges to 2.0 V were measured on the authors' bench; the fixture conductance (0.337 W/K) follows from the energy balance and the heat capacity (277 J/K) from the cooling. With the end-of-lithiation drop of LiFePO4 restored in the cathode open-circuit potential, the calibrated set follows the can temperature within 0.44 K (1C) and 0.76 K (2C), reproduces the peaks and the relaxation after cut-off. What remains is what a single can node and a single representative particle do not describe: the axial gradient of the NMC can under contact heating, and a gradual decline of the LFP voltage before the knee at 2C, which points to the distribution of particle states in the electrode. The parameter sets (BPX, CSV) and the bench data are openly available.
EvoSim self improves AI to build better physics models for batteries
EvoSim: Learning to Model, Modeling to Learn
Abstract: Physics-based models connect scientific explanation with quantitative prediction. Constructing them requires selecting physical processes, defining states and governing equations, specifying couplings, and identifying parameters from experiments. Existing AI systems remain limited in making these model structure decisions autonomously. We introduce EvoSim, a self-evolving AI scientist for physical modeling. It uses experimental discrepancies to drive mechanism and equation revisions and held-out experimental data to test physical plausibility. Exploration traces make updates to knowledge, skills, and multi-agent orchestration. This co-evolution improves physics-based models and EvoSim's ability to select mechanisms, diagnose failures, and coordinate research. We evaluate EvoSim on two industrial battery modeling tasks. It predicts lithium-metal-plating onset from 25 to 45 degrees Celsius and 2 C to 6 C with a mean absolute error of 1.79% in state of charge. Dynamic voltage prediction under vehicle driving conditions achieves a root mean square error of 7.62 mV, surpassing the reported accuracy of models developed by human experts. Self-evolution reduces model and physics errors by approximately 36% relative to baseline, demonstrating improved scientific modeling capability. EvoSim turns experimental observations into validated models and cumulative research expertise.
Battery discharge stage system improves remaining use time prediction
Relative Discharge Stage (RDS) Classification: A Practical Indicator of Battery Discharge Progress
Abstract: Accurate remaining discharge time (RDT) prediction is challenging in real-world battery applications because future load profiles are unknown and highly dynamic. To address the uncertainty of continuous RDT regression, this paper introduces Relative Discharge Stage (RDS), a battery-management indicator that represents the remaining discharge condition using five interpretable classes: Normal, Good, Moderate, Low, and Recharge Required. Unlike state of charge (SOC), which reflects the current charge level, RDS characterizes the remaining discharge process without requiring future-current information during inference. A physics-informed RDS classification framework is proposed, combining SOC estimation with lightweight temporal learning. The SOC-estimation component includes second-order ECM state and terminal-voltage prediction, hysteresis and OCV temperature correction, core-temperature estimation, and AEKF state correction, supported by OCV evaluation, online STC-ECM parameter adaptation, and pretrained neural residual-voltage correction. The measured current, terminal voltage, surface temperature, and estimated SOC are arranged into a sliding observation window and processed by a lightweight temporal convolutional network. Experiments on two public lithium-ion battery datasets demonstrate robust RDS classification, with accuracy exceeding 80% under varying load and thermal conditions.