autonomous vehicle teams

Abstract: Vision-language-action policies are typically evaluated one perturbation at a time, providing a useful diagnosis of their sensitivity to individual distribution shifts. Real-world deployment, however, may involve several shifts simultaneously, and it remains unclear how these individual robustness measurements compose. We ask whether compound robustness can be inferred from single-axis evaluations. We introduce LIBERO-CTRL, a six-axis benchmark that pairs each initial state across single-axis conditions and a matched simultaneous condition. This design reveals two opposing outcome changes that aggregate success rates cannot distinguish: emergent failures, where all single-axis rollouts succeed but the simultaneous rollout fails, and compensated successes, where at least one single-axis rollout fails but the simultaneous rollout succeeds. Because one transition decreases compound success while the other increases it, they can cancel, making aggregate compound performance appear consistent with single-axis measurements even when individual outcomes differ substantially. These opposing transitions can largely cancel in aggregate: even when the difference between the two transition rates is not statistically distinguishable from zero, as many as 29.0% of matched initial states still change outcome. Across six policies and three severity levels, such outcome changes reach 34.5% in the most affected condition. The relative prevalence of the two transitions varies across policies and severities, while the transition rates remain similar under independent re-evaluation of stochastic policies. Compound robustness therefore cannot be characterized from aggregate single-axis success rates alone; matched per-instance evaluation is needed to reveal how joint perturbations alter behavior.

Abstract: A robot following language instructions needs its semantic memory to keep naming the same physical object while the SLAM pose graph underneath is optimized, loop-closed and compressed. Maps committing each detection to a world coordinate cannot: a closure moves the anchor it was measured from, or the solver marginalizes that anchor, and the query then selects a different object although both graphs represent the same posterior. P-POSEMEM stores each observation as an immutable event at its birth keyframe, retains the Bayes-tree elimination conditional of every marginalized keyframe, and integrates the semantic likelihood over the reconstructed joint posterior of poses, anchors and identities. Dproj, the total-variation defect between the language-goal distributions of inference-equivalent full and marginalized graphs, measures this directly. Over 40 HM3DSem scenes and 112,000 queries, P-POSEMEM reproduces the full-graph oracle (Dproj = 0) and reduces goal flips against every memory-reducing baseline. On an eight-run campaign whose 761 closures rewrote the map by up to 47 m, Dproj stays below 10^-13 with 0/288 goal flips when elimination follows the closures, where every ablation and a coordinate committed at insertion flip goals it does not; under a live bounded solver the same memory flips 23/288 against 53 for that frozen coordinate. A pre-registered negative control is detected by Dproj while leaving calibration error and navigation success unchanged, indicating that these measures capture distinct failure modes. Retrieval is held fixed by a shared frozen detector, isolating the gain to memory consistency. Code and data: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/posemem-2328/.

Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (RL) is commonly formalized as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP), in which an agent maximizes expected reward while keeping its expected cumulative cost below a specified safety bound. Existing safe RL benchmarks predominantly report whether an algorithm is safe on average, following this expectation-based guarantee. We argue that this convention is insufficient to reliably characterize an algorithm's true safety: it fails to capture how often and how severely the safety bound is violated, whether this holds consistently across tasks and safety bounds, and whether training-time behavior is representative of behavior of the final converged policy. Therefore, we introduce (i) evaluation metrics for safe RL that address each of these concerns and in addition allow for aggregation across tasks and safety bounds. We furthermore define (ii) a safety tier system to systematically categorize and compare algorithms in terms of safety and reliability at both training and for a final policy. Using this framework, we provide (iii) an empirical safety evaluation across multiple safety navigation tasks. Our results show that aggregate metrics, distributional reporting, and task- and safety bound-specific results each reveal information the other metrics cannot. We therefore recommend reporting all three jointly, rather than compressing this information into a single value, as is common practice. We provide SafeRLEval, an open-source evaluation suite to support the reliable characterization of safety in future safe RL research.

Abstract: Accurate 3D localization of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) remains challenging for existing multimodal approaches due to sparse LiDAR geometry, modality-imbalanced fusion, and redundant feature transmission over constrained edge-to-server links. To address these limitations, we propose PRI-Net, an efficient and lightweight multimodal fusion framework for UAV localization that integrates point cloud splatting, residual attention fusion, and an information bottleneck. Specifically, a 3D point cloud splatting (3DPCS) strategy is introduced to transform sparse LiDAR observations into geometrically consistent dense depth maps. A residual attention fusion (RAF) module is then designed to alleviate modal bias by using an image branch for coarse estimation and a gated fusion branch for refinement. In addition, a multimodal information bottleneck (MIB) module compacts features by filtering task-irrelevant redundancy. Experiments show that PRI-Net achieves high localization accuracy with lightweight architectures, while reducing feature dimensionality and improving edge-to-server UAV sensing efficiency and robustness.

Abstract: A world model asked what happens if an object is pushed at several speeds produces several futures. If the model has the object in mind, those futures agree about it: each implies the same mass and friction. The consistency checks now used to vet world-action models ask whether a model's futures agree with each other, and none of them knows any physics. We show that this is not enough, and what to do instead. IMPLY reads the physics each rollout implies by inverting a simulator and scores a set of rollouts by how well one object explains all of them, anchored to two calibration pushes the model has observed. In a controlled setting, self-consistency gives a perfect score to a model that ignores the object and always predicts a typical push; anchoring exposes it (AUROC 0.70 versus 1.00). On a real model, V-JEPA 2-AC adapted to the scene, the same thing happens. Given its own calibration pushes the model tracks the object (per-object correlation with the truth 0.91); given another object's, it does not (0.05). Self-consistency cannot tell these apart, preferring the right evidence on 52% of objects, chance level, while anchored disagreement prefers it on 73% and correlates 0.92-0.99 with the rollouts' error. Used to choose among candidate rollout sets, it comes within 0.003 of an oracle that sees the truth. A model that has internalised the wrong object is exactly as self-consistent as one that has internalised the right one; consistency has to be anchored to evidence.

Abstract: Maintaining consistency over long spatial and temporal horizons remains a fundamental challenge in large-scale LiDAR SLAM, particularly when integrating maps collected across multiple sessions. We present Chain-SLAM, a LiDAR SLAM backend enabling online multi-session map alignment and reuse with global consistency at large scale. We implement a chained loop closure mechanism that efficiently propagates geometric constraints across inter-session keyframes through an adjacency graph, enabling robust long-horizon consistency triggered by reliable short-horizon loop closures. The system initializes inter-session alignment with GNSS-proximity place recognition, then performs on-the-fly loop closure detections and joint optimization of loaded maps and newly acquired trajectories within a unified factor graph, maintaining both inter- and intra-session geometric consistency without dynamic object removal, and cross-platform robustness with minimal hyperparameter tuning. Experimental results show improved trajectory accuracy and robust multi-session integration on large-scale datasets. We release our source code to support reproducible research in large-scale multi-session LiDAR SLAM. Project site: https://ai4ce.github.io/Chain-SLAM/

Abstract: UAV video question answering requires separating camera motion from changes in the scene, but RGB-only multimodal models receive no explicit, stable reference for that separation. We present EgoSIS, a pose-free adapter that converts RGB-derived bidirectional flow into motion-canonical visual evidence in three stages. Factorized Visual Ego-Transitions (FVET) fits a robust image-plane transition and exposes motion, residual-support, and reliability factors. Reliability-Gated Ego-Transition Memory (ReTEM) uses reliability-weighted updates for a bounded history and re-anchors it at cuts or sustained uncertainty. Ego-Aligned Spatial Evidence (EASE) warps supported visual features into each segment's local anchor and injects four spatial evidence tokens per visual slice through zero-initialized residuals, without changing Qwen's visual-token count. On SIS-Bench, EgoSIS-8B obtains 89.9\% perception, 82.5\% perception-plus-memory, and 76.2\% overall accuracy, with the largest gains concentrated in self-awareness perception and memory. The adapter thus provides an interpretable interface between optical flow and spatial reasoning.

Abstract: Embodied planning increasingly relies on vision-language models (VLMs) to translate instructions and visual observations into executable action sequences. However, fluent plans are not always executable. A VLM may refer to objects that are not visually observed, select actions whose required affordances are unavailable, or violate syntax and action constraints. We introduce CLAMP, a multimodal constraint-grounding framework that turns scene evidence into decoding-time constraints for a frozen VLM planner. CLAMP uses the initial observation to restrict object references to those supported by the scene, while a provided symbolic action model specifies state transitions and goals. During decoding, hard masks eliminate invalid next-token candidates, while a Hidden Markov Model (HMM)-based world-state lookahead module reweights the probabilities of the remaining feasible candidates based on action preconditions and goal reachability. This allows the planner to retain the VLM's language prior while preventing visually unsupported, unsafe, or infeasible candidates from entering the plan. For unseen tasks and environments, CLAMP adapts the HMM at test time using label-free continuations sampled from the frozen VLM. Experiments on VLABench, SafeAgentBench, and TaPA show that scene-grounded constraints improve object grounding and safety, while most remaining failures stem from perception errors or misaligned constraint specifications.

Abstract: How can vision-language-action (VLA) models adapt to new environments where world dynamics shift? While recent research has combined world modeling and action prediction to improve VLA performance, existing methods largely rely on pretraining on static datasets, without mechanisms for active adaptation at deployment time. As a result, these models often fail to generalize when deployed in unseen scenarios with novel object configurations or dynamics. We present WorldAgen, a unified framework that jointly learns world modeling and action prediction while enabling Test-Time Training (TTT) to adapt to new environments. WorldAgen employs a shared Transformer backbone with two heads: (1) a world model head that predicts future states from past state-action trajectories, and (2) an agent model head that predicts actions conditioned on task instructions. We design a Mixed Unidirectional Attention Mask to separate these two models. During test time, WorldAgen samples exploratory actions, collects ground-truth state transitions, and performs lightweight TTT updates to refine its world model. This adaptation improves the model's understanding of the environment and leads to more accurate action predictions. Experiments on the CALVIN and LIBERO benchmarks demonstrate that our baseline model achieves comparable, and in some cases superior, performance to current state-of-the-art approaches. Moreover, with TTT on a small number of samples, our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art models, highlighting the effectiveness of adapting world models at inference time.

Abstract: Image restoration is commonly applied before object detection under adverse conditions, yet a visually improved image need not improve the downstream task. We study this mismatch as restoration utility prediction: given a degraded image and its candidate restoration, should the restoration be used or should the original observation be preserved? We introduce TaskGuard, a post-hoc controller for frozen restoration and detection pipelines. TaskGuard characterizes the realized restoration residual through its interaction with detector sensitivity and predicts whether the intervention is task-beneficial. Exact regional counterfactuals reveal substantial within-image utility heterogeneity, while a deployable pseudo-gradient preserves statistically reliable directional information. Feature-group ablation further shows that task-conditioned evidence contributes information beyond detector-response and residual statistics. The TaskGuard utility predictor is trained only on Gaussian degradation and frozen before final evaluation, then transferred to unseen motion blur, rain, and defocus. Across these unseen families, TaskGuard reduces lossnegative interventions by 54.2% (family macro) and practical per-image detection deteriorations by 37.0% (pooled), while preserving 98.8% of the Always-Restore COCO AP. On natural-rain DAWN, it reduces loss-negative interventions by 97.9% while retaining 77.8% of the AP improvement obtained by deraining. These results support restoration utility as a task-conditioned property of the specific intervention rather than image appearance alone.

Abstract: Vision-language models are increasingly used in settings where some input modalities may be unavailable, yet we know little about whether they can faithfully explain how such missing information affects their own predictions. We introduce an interventional protocol for evaluating self-explanations of modality dynamics: models state what each modality alone would support, whether restoring a missing modality would change their answer, and whether the available evidence is sufficient; we then execute the corresponding modality intervention and compare these claims with the model's realized behavior. We evaluate eight open-weight VLMs from two model families across four tasks spanning complementary and isomorphic text-image settings and a multi-view driving setting. We find a systematic tendency to overstate the sufficiency of available modality evidence. Models substantially underestimate the effect of restoring missing modalities: task-level median predicted change rates are at most 8.8%, while the corresponding executed change rates reach 72.1%, with underprediction in 62 of 64 model-task-condition settings. Insufficiency claims are rare, but precise when produced: restoring the modality changes the answer in a median of 78-100% of flagged cases. Retrospective self-explanations show the same tendency: on complementary data, models over-credit single-modality sufficiency; on isomorphic data, they over-credit single representation sufficiency relative to their executed behavior. Together, these results show that VLMs systematically mischaracterize how their predictions depend on available and missing modality evidence, motivating executable interventions as a behavioral ground truth for evaluating multimodal self-explanations.