Papers for

autonomous vehicle fleets

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Centralized critics improve teamwork for many-agent learning systems

Centralized Critics for N-Agent Ad Hoc Teamwork

Abstract: Centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE) has become the dominant paradigm in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), motivating extensive study of what privileged information should be made available to the critic during training. While prior work has examined the role of global state in fully cooperative settings, the design of centralized critics for N-agent ad hoc teamwork - in which dynamically varying set of learning agents must coordinate with an arbitrary set of uncontrolled teammates drawn from an unknown distribution - remains poorly understood. We study this question by comparing two natural classes of advantage estimators: controlled history estimators, which condition only on the observation and action histories of the learner's own agents, and joint history estimators, which additionally condition on the histories of the uncontrolled teammates. We prove that both estimators are unbiased and characterize the conditions under which the joint history estimate attains strictly lower variance than its controlled counterpart. Empirically, joint history critics match or outperform controlled history critics across a range of NAHT tasks, yielding improved sample efficiency and final returns. Together, these results provide both a theoretical justification and an empirical recommendation for incorporating uncontrolled agent histories into centralized critics for N-agent ad hoc teamwork.

Mon 26 OctArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
When multiple agents work together in a team but have to coordinate with unknown partners, it’s hard to teach them how to cooperate well. The authors study two ways to help learning agents judge their actions using information from their own history alone or also from the histories of their unknown teammates. They prove both methods are unbiased but show that using joint histories can reduce errors during learning. Their experiments find that considering teammates’ histories often leads to better team coordination and faster learning.
Open → 2610.34799v1

Multi agent model improves team planning in cooperative tasks

MA-WAM: Multi-Agent World-Action Model for Test-Time Planning

Abstract: Multi-agent cooperative tasks require different agents to execute a joint action simultaneously, and each agent's action affects both the observations and responses of the other agents. Hence, a world model is needed to predict the team return resulting from the joint actions of all agents. A naive extension directly applies a single-agent world model to each agent's action when predicting the team return step by step. However, such an extension fails to capture the dependencies among the simultaneous actions of multiple agents. We propose Multi-Agent World-Action Model (MA-WAM), a test-time planning framework that enables a frozen multi-agent flow policy to evaluate futures of candidate joint actions. To our knowledge, MA-WAM is the first test-time world-model planner for multi-agent flow policies. MA-WAM predicts the consequences of each joint action according to cross-agent dependencies and enables efficient candidate scoring. Across 30 offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) settings on MAMuJoCo, SMAC, and MPE, MA-WAM achieves mean relative gains of 22.0% over direct execution and 25.6% over uniform action selection. Under the standard evaluation protocol on an A100 GPU, MA-WAM adds 12.1 ms, accounting for 2.5% of the measured generation-and-scoring time.

Fri 25 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Cooperative tasks with multiple agents need everyone to act together at the same time, but each agent's action affects the others, making planning hard. The authors created MA-WAM, a system that predicts what will happen when all agents act jointly by understanding their interactions. This method helps choose the best group actions, improving team performance in many simulated tasks. It works quickly without slowing down the action planning.
Open → 2609.31281v1