Papers for
automotive cybersecurity teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
LLM security and privacy gaps challenge safe AI in mobility sector
On the security and privacy of LLMs in Mobility
Abstract: The mobility sector is undergoing a paradigm shift driven by advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence. With a global market valued at approximately 2.9 trillion dollars annually, considering only cars, the integration of these technologies has the potential to impact more than 1.5 billion vehicles worldwide. As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in mobility, concerns about cybersecurity, privacy, and reliability emerge. Accordingly, this paper surveys current applications and assesses these challenges. Since the European AI Act classifies transportation AI as high risk, we derive nine technical classes from its requirements to assess current research and future deployments. Our findings show that research mainly studies GPT and Llama models (over 50\% of reviewed works) and traffic applications while largely neglecting security, privacy, and reliability. This gap extends to AI Act compliance: among 35 reviewed works, only one includes a partial vulnerability assessment and one a partial risk management system. We identify a clear gap between strong optimization performance and regulatory adherence, suggesting compliance is limited less by technology than by a focus on static performance over lifecycle safety, and underscoring an urgent need for security-by-design in safety-critical intelligent transportation systems.
Traceability method links fake car identities to attackers in autonomous networks
Sybil-TraceGuard: Traceability-enhanced Sybil Guardian for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Using Dynamic Semi-supervised GNN
Abstract: Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) face severe Sybil attacks, where attackers exploit privacy-preserving pseudonym-switching mechanisms to anomaly alternate identities while forging Basic Safety Messages (BSMs). Although existing schemes can flag suspicious behaviors, these temporally fragmented Sybil identities render traditional single-point and sequence-based deep learning methods ineffective. Linking these fragmented identities back to the source attacker is essential for root-cause elimination, particularly under extreme label scarcity. Therefore, the Sybil-TraceGuard is proposed as a dynamic semi-supervised spatio-temporal GNN framework for Sybil Guardian, prioritizing "who is responsible" over "whether an attack is happening". It comprises four tightly coupled modules: Incremental Stream Attack Detection (ISAD) for efficient Sybil attack pre-screening; the Dynamic Topology-aware Constructor (DTC) for constructing spatio-temporal dynamic graphs; the Spatial GAT-Encoder with Multi-head Attention (SGEM) to capture multi-identity logical conflicts in spatial interactions; and the Multi-scale Spatio-Temporal Audit (MSTA) to audit short-term and long-term temporal inconsistencies. These modules are optimized within a semi-supervised Mean-Teacher framework via feature-edge shuffling perturbations, regularizing the latent feature space using minimal labels. Experiments across four Sybil attack scenarios demonstrate that Sybil-TraceGuard effectively links fragmented pseudonyms to source attackers. It outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across unlabeled ratios of 0.70-0.95, maintaining high stability and sensitivity despite extreme class imbalance and varying hyperparameter settings.
Cooperative vehicle sensing vulnerable to new stealth feature attacks
Investigating Adversarial Robustness of Heterogeneous Cooperative Perception
Abstract: Heterogeneous cooperative perception (CP) enables connected vehicles with diverse sensor setups to share spatial awareness via compact feature maps, where receivers reconcile these maps using learned translation modules for fusion and inference. Prior attacks against CP in a homogeneous setting reveal that the data exchange introduces a critical attack surface: a single malicious agent can transmit crafted features that erase real objects from a neighbor's fused scene. Yet, it is widely hypothesized that heterogeneity naturally defends against these attacks, as the attacker lacks knowledge of the victim's detector and the translation module scrambles adversarial gradients. We demonstrate that this protection is largely an illusion. Using a matched-objective harness to standardize the perturbation budget, objective, and forward path, we show that properly tuned iterative attacks close or reverse the apparent robustness gap. However, these optimization-based attacks require ground-truth labels and iterative backpropagation, meaning they do not represent a practical field threat running in real-time. To bridge this gap, we introduce HetPoison, a learned generator that crafts a removal perturbation in a single, label-free forward pass. HetPoison transfers across major heterogeneous designs without requiring access to the victim's detector, matching or exceeding the effectiveness of expensive optimizer-based attacks. Since heterogeneity itself is not a defense, we propose HetShield, a lightweight trust layer that validates the spatiotemporal consistency across features, recovering 83--95% of the accuracy degraded by attacks, outperforming prior art.