Papers for

audiobook production teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Text-to-speech models can steer rising or falling pitch intonation

Steering intonational tunes in text-to-speech synthesis

Abstract: Text-to-speech systems built on residual vector quantization often generate audio in two stages: a transformer backbone emits the first level of each frame's token stack, and a smaller depth model generates the rest autoregressively. We ask which components of such a model are responsible for prosodic intonation, more precisely for generating the English nuclear tune (for instance, the falling pitch melody that distinguishes an assertion from a question's rising melody), and whether interventions on those components can be used to control intonation. Prompt-based control mostly fails; only a final question mark is a reliable lever. Interchange interventions in CSM and S2 locate the tune: the backbone's hidden state carries it to the waveform through the depth model, and the first level of the stack carries little or none of it. Steering the backbone state with a difference-of-means vector computed on new material generated with a final period or question mark moves the tune, but the push toward an assertion degrades the voice. Steering vectors computed instead from the backbone states associated with human imitations of theoretically-specified tunes, whose text carries no punctuation, and applied inside the generation loop, move most recordings to the other condition in both systems (even when fitted without the speaker being steered), at a small cost in predicted naturalness. These imitation-derived vectors are aligned with the one obtained from the two punctuated conditions far beyond a shuffled-label null, so the backbone state of a punctuated prompt already represents intonation. The steered recordings broadly become falling or rising, according to the intent, but the edge tone moves more coherently than the pitch accent, and the target tune cannot be selected precisely beyond this broad tendency.

Mon 19 OctSoundComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Text-to-speech systems create spoken words from written text, but controlling how the speech sounds—like making a question rise in pitch or a statement fall—can be tricky. The authors studied parts of a popular speech model to find which piece controls these pitch patterns, called intonation. They discovered that a specific hidden state in the main part of the model carries the tune, and by adjusting this, they could shift the speech to sound more like a question or a statement. While this steering changes the overall melody, it isn't perfect and sometimes slightly reduces naturalness.
Open → 2610.27403v1

Prime-EVC converts emotional voices in one fast and natural step

Prime-EVC: One-Step Expressive Emotional Voice Conversion via Emotion-Primed Flow Matching

Abstract: Recent diffusion- and conditional flow matching (CFM)-based emotional voice conversion (EVC) systems achieve strong conversion quality. However, they typically rely on multiple sampling steps, because the conditioning specifies which emotion to impose while its acoustic realization is left to the sampler. In this paper, we propose Prime-EVC, a one-step expressive EVC architecture based on emotion-primed flow matching. Our key idea is to reallocate the emotional conversion between the conditioning and the sampler: a FiLM-fused speaker-emotion style, an emotional variance adaptor, and direct emotion and spectro-temporal supervision assemble an emotion-rich conditioning upstream, rendering the residual conversion left to the CFM decoder attainable within one Euler step. Experiments on the ESD corpus demonstrate that single-step Prime-EVC surpasses five representative EVC systems on every quality metric and exceeds 4- and 100-step DurFlex-EVC in subjective naturalness and emotion while running 3.4--50 times faster than both.

Mon 12 OctSound
The gist
Emotional voice conversion means changing how a voice sounds to express different feelings. Previous systems needed many steps to get good results, which made them slow. The authors propose Prime-EVC, a new method that combines emotional cues in a way that lets it convert voices in a single quick step. Tests show it makes more natural and expressive voices than other popular methods, while being much faster.
Open → 2610.16036v1

Steerspeech lets text to speech voices express emotion with precision

Steerspeech: Activation Steering For Emotion Control In Generated Speech

Abstract: Pretrained text-to-speech (TTS) models can generate expressive speech, but reliable inference-time emotion control remains challenging: prompts and reference audio offer coarse, inconsistent control, whereas specialized conditioning and model adaptation require costly training. We present SteerSpeech, a lightweight activation-steering framework that controls emotion by injecting steering vectors into hidden activations. For each target emotion we train a lightweight low-rank transform, using a multi-expert objective that encourages monotonic emotion control while preserving speaker identity and linguistic content, constraining steering drift, and keeping the TTS backbone frozen. To optimize through discrete speech tokens, we introduce a two-pass generation-and-replay pipeline using a straight-through estimator to backpropagate expert supervision through sampled tokens. At inference, a target-emotion steering direction is optimized with its respective transform and injected into the base TTS model. Objective and subjective evaluations with Qwen3-TTS across seen, unseen, and accented speakers show stronger continuous emotion control with limited speaker and content degradation. SteerSpeech achieves 1.08x-7.12x baseline target-emotion scores and for a representative emotion subjectively, it receives 78.1%-96.8% intensity preference and 1.43x-1.46x speaker-identity preservation at high steering strengths.

Wed 7 OctSoundMachine Learning
The gist
Text-to-speech systems can speak with emotion, but controlling the feeling consistently and clearly is hard. The authors present SteerSpeech, a way to finely adjust emotions like happiness or sadness in speech by tweaking the model’s internal signals without retraining everything. This method works quickly and keeps the voice and words clear. It improves emotional expression across different voices and languages compared to earlier methods.
Open → 2610.10415v1

Refinement and depth improve different parts of text to speech quality

Refinement Buys Intelligibility, Search Buys Identity: What Test-Time Compute Buys in Masked-Diffusion TTS

Abstract: Diffusion language models for text-to-speech combine two forms of computation: model depth (parameters) and refinement steps (inference budget). We ask whether they scale equally across capabilities. We train 15 masked-diffusion codec TTS models varying depth (19-133M parameters, 3 seeds) on 2,000 hours of speech and sweep refinement steps T in [1,16] at inference, measuring zero-shot synthesis via ASR word error rate (intelligibility) and speaker verification (identity) on 174 held-out speakers. Against measured floors, refinement closes 86.2% of the intelligibility range but only 46.4% of the identity range - a 1.86x asymmetry robust across multiple error metrics. Retraining at 3x and 6x schedule attenuates but does not reverse this gap (1.84 to 1.36 to 1.23x), because intelligibility saturates with steps while identity continues improving. Best-of-K search recovers speaker identity where refinement fails, with 64.6-79.0% win rates across four independent encoders. Depth and steps are not interchangeable: separable B(d)B(T) fits significantly better (Delta AICc=+69.3) than substitution models. Analysis shows 62% of remaining identity deficit lies in the codec, not the generator. We conclude that refinement and depth target different bottlenecks and should be optimized separately.

Fri 2 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Making computer voices sound natural involves two main tricks: making the model bigger and letting it refine its guess more times when speaking. This paper shows these two tricks do different jobs: refining improves how clear the speech is, while bigger models help keep the speaker's unique voice. The researchers found that trying harder with one method can’t fully replace the other and that most speaker identity issues come from a part called the codec. So, to make voices sound clear and true to a person, both model size and refinement steps need to be considered separately.
Open → 2610.03320v1

Accent analogy guidance improves speaker identity in cross language voice cloning

Accent Analogy Guidance: More Speaker Similarity at Equal Accent in Cross-Lingual Voice Cloning

Abstract: In cross-lingual zero-shot text-to-speech, the accent of the reference leaks into the target speech. We propose accent analogy guidance (AAG), a training-free sampler term that subtracts an accent direction estimated from the model's own predictions for one synthetic voice rendered in both languages, so the voice cancels and only the accent remains. By a blind LLM accent judge on real dubbing data, reweighting classifier-free guidance between reference and text, and its variants, stay near one identity-accent trade-off curve; we score a method by its speaker similarity above that curve at equal accent ($Δ$SIM). Across four open TTS models AAG lies above the curve: on OmniVoice $Δ$SIM is +0.11 to +0.27 on three test sets (accent 3.51 to 4.28 on a 1-5 scale at speaker similarity 0.29, where reweighting keeps 0.02); MaskGCT and CosyVoice 2 also lie above their curves, and on F5-TTS it is more native than any reweighting setting. An LLM-free language-ID measure and a twelve-listener panel agree. A premise test and the reach of a model's own curve indicate in advance whether and roughly how much AAG can gain, predicting the one model where it gains nothing (X-Voice).

Thu 24 SeptSoundComputation and Language
The gist
When computers clone someone's voice in a different language, the accent from the original voice can accidentally appear in the new speech. The authors propose a way to reduce this effect by separating the accent from the speaker’s unique voice. This method uses the model’s own guesses to cancel out the voice identity while keeping the accent. Their tests show this leads to better speaker similarity without losing the intended accent.
Open → 2609.29123v1

Learnable null embeddings improve speech synthesis quality and control

Learnable Classifier-Free Guidance Null Embeddings for Enhanced Controllable Speech Synthesis

Abstract: Classifier-free Guidance (CFG) is widely adopted in text-to-speech (TTS) systems to enhance generation quality and conditioning fidelity by interpolating between conditioned and unconditioned predictions. A common unconditional technique is to use an empty representation, in the form of a fixed null vector. In this work, we propose replacing this representation with a learnable unconditional embedding, optimized to represent a meaningful unconditional state. Objective and subjective evaluations demonstrate that learnable null embeddings consistently outperform fixed null embeddings across speaker similarity, speech stability, and expressiveness, while exhibiting greater robustness to larger guidance scales. We further show that learning a distinct unconditional embedding for each of the TTS conditioning modalities allows fine-grained control over speaker and text guidance, showcasing the trade-off between similarity and quality, and stability and expressiveness in the generated speech.

Mon 21 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Text-to-speech systems try to turn written words into spoken speech, but sometimes struggle with voice consistency and expressiveness. This paper shows that by allowing the system to learn a special 'null' embedding—an unconditional sound representation—speech quality and speaker likeness improve. The researchers found that using different learnable null embeddings for various parts of the system gives more precise control over voice and expressiveness. This approach makes synthetic speech sound more natural and stable, even when pushing the system to produce stronger effects.
Open → 2609.25411v1

Self-distilled method improves rare word and accent control in text-to-speech

Self-Distilled Pronunciation and Accent Control for Neural Text-to-Speech

Abstract: Text-to-speech that reads raw text has no lexicon: a rare word is read as guessed. Remedies train a reading-and-accent channel on recorded speech or edit words one at a time from exemplars. We do neither. The frozen backbone reads a sentence containing a common word it already says correctly, and its own output then serves as the teacher for the same sentence, with that word replaced by a tagged, accented reading; this training pair is the whole idea. On Sarashina2.2-TTS, screened raters at Fleiss' kappa = 0.85 hear the prescribed accent on 0.89 of unseen words against 0.57 for kana, which cannot express one; kana wins no pair; naturalness is not measurably hurt. Moved untuned to autoregressive, diffusion, and encoder-decoder backbones, it transfers reading, 0.25 to 0.47 above no edit on 319 words, and on CosyVoice 2 accent on two words in three, but not on Irodori; the paper locates why.

Tue 15 SeptSound
The gist
Text-to-speech systems often struggle to pronounce uncommon words correctly or with the right accent because they typically guess from spelling. The authors developed a technique where the system learns to improve its own pronunciation by using its correct reading of common words as a teacher for rare or accented words. This method works well without needing extra recorded speech or word-by-word corrections and does not reduce the natural sound of the speech. The approach also transfers well to different types of text-to-speech models with some exceptions.
Open → 2609.17234v1