Papers for

audio technology engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Spatial hearing improves through feedback using the free energy principle

Framing Spatial Hearing within the Free Energy Principle: A Hierarchical Model of Perceptual Learning

Abstract: Spatial hearing relies on dynamic internal representations to decode spatial information from ever-changing acoustic conditions. A fundamental example is sound localisation, where listeners infer the direction of an invisible sound. Bayesian inference provides a computational account of such a localisation process; however, modelling efforts are largely limited to static listening scenarios. Instead, the free energy principle (FEP) describes perception, learning, and action as joint minimisation of variational free energy (VFE), providing a principled framework to account for dynamic conditions. Here, we take a first step toward applying the FEP to spatial hearing. We characterise how listeners' beliefs evolve across trials, in which they estimated sound direction and received subsequent visual feedback on each trial. Listeners are described by a hierarchical generative model where visual feedback drives gradient descent on VFE, updating beliefs over three independent quantities: lateral and polar localisation precisions and hemifield disambiguation. The model captures individual learning trajectories and reveals components with different dynamics: lateral precision improves, as does hemifield disambiguation, consistent with increased sensitivity of the auditory pathway in decoding vertical direction. Notably, polar precision also increases, most for listeners with the lowest initial precision, suggesting that the observed vertical improvement is driven by both hemifield disambiguation and polar precision. This work establishes spatial hearing as a tractable domain for FEP and motivates future closed-loop experiments with full action-perception cycles.

Fri 16 OctSoundArtificial Intelligence
The gist
People use hearing to figure out where sounds come from, but this is difficult because sounds and environments change all the time. The authors show a way to understand how listeners learn to localize sounds better by updating their internal beliefs after getting visual feedback. Their model explains how different parts of hearing sensitivity improve over time, especially for vertical sound direction. This research helps connect theories about brain function to how we learn spatial hearing in everyday situations.
Open → 2610.23196v1

Brain activity data helps decode natural speech from podcasts

Cephalonauts One: A deep fMRI dataset for decoding naturalistic speech in the human brain

Abstract: Cephalonauts One is a whole-brain 3 Tesla (3T) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset recorded while subjects listened to audio podcasts. Three healthy subjects underwent multiple scanning sessions, each consisting of five 15-minute runs, while listening to podcasts in their native language. With 30 hours of fMRI data per subject, the current release is the deepest available fMRI dataset using naturalistic speech stimuli. The dataset pairs brain activity with the corresponding podcast audio, transcript annotations, and derived stimulus embeddings. Furthermore, we introduce a brain decoding benchmark formulated as audio segment retrieval: given fMRI activity from a held-out session, the decoder must identify the corresponding time-aligned podcast audio segment among candidate segments. We provide standardized splits, evaluation metrics, and baseline decoders for this task. Finally, a scaling analysis shows that decoding performance improves continuously with the amount of training data per subject.

Fri 2 OctMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Understanding how our brains process everyday speech is challenging because brain signals are complex and data is limited. The authors collected a very large set of brain scans from people listening to podcasts in their own language. They matched brain activity with the exact podcast audio and transcripts to try to identify which spoken segment someone was hearing just from their brain scan. They also tested computer methods to decode this from the brain data and found that more data helps improve decoding accuracy.
Open → 2610.03558v1