Papers for

audio security teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Deepfake audio detectors rely more on events than speech sounds

What Do Deepfake Audio Detectors Hear? From Self-Supervised Models to Audio LLMs

Abstract: Real-world audio recordings for deepfake detection rarely consist solely of speech; they often are mixtures of speech and background events that themselves may also be synthetic. When processing these mixtures, it remains unclear whether detectors attend to the speech or the background event, and where their spectral evidence lies. We study this on the CompSpoof V2 database, whose mixtures pair independently real-or-fake speech and event components. Our results show that all systems detect fake events more accurately than fake speech. However, this performance gap is largely driven by poor generalization to an unseen fake speech domain, rather than a true difference in difficulty. Furthermore, sub-band probing reveals that the front-end encoder dictates where a countermeasure focuses its frequency evidence. To enable reliable deployment in real-world scenarios, future countermeasures should address out-of-domain generalization failures and carefully select front-end encoders aligned with their target acoustic evidence. Our source code and checkpoints are released at https://github.com/nii-yamagishilab/AntiDeepfake-AudioLLM.

Tue 13 OctSound
The gist
Detecting fake audio is tricky because real recordings usually mix speech with background noises, and both can be faked. The authors studied how well detectors spot fake speech versus fake background sounds and found detectors identify fake background noises better than fake speech. However, this difference is due to detectors struggling with new types of fake speech they haven't seen before, not because fake speech is inherently harder to detect. They also discovered the part of the detector that processes sound waves strongly influences which frequencies it focuses on. To improve fake audio detection, future tools need to handle unfamiliar fake speech better and choose their sound-processing methods carefully.
Open → 2610.17617v1

Neural codec compression weakens audio deepfake detectors performance

Exposing and Mitigating Neural Codec Vulnerabilities in Audio Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Existing audio deepfake detection (ADD) datasets and detectors are primarily built for vocoder-based synthesis, evaluated against traditional post-hoc perturbations such as MP3/AAC compression or additive noise, applied independently of generation. However, recent speech synthesizers, particularly ALM-based systems, use neural audio codecs both for compression and as the resynthesis reconstructing waveforms from generated tokens, producing artifacts distinct from post-hoc compression. Neural codecs thus play a dual role: some are designed for pure compression under low-bandwidth communication, while others serve as resynthesis components. Despite this dual role, robustness to codec-based compression, unlike post-hoc compression, remains largely unexplored. We expose this gap, showing that state-of-the-art (SOTA) ADD models degrade drastically on codec-compressed speech; in particular, systems trained on Codec Resynthesized data as a proxy for codec-based generation prove most vulnerable, with legitimately compressed bona fide speech often misclassified as fake. To investigate this, we construct the Audio Neural Codec-Spoof dataset by applying seven neural codec algorithms to existing ADD benchmarks, isolating codec-induced resynthesis artifacts as a controlled proxy for codec-based generation. As baseline mitigation, we propose PCL-NET (Pairwise Consistency Learned Network), fine-tuning a pretrained XLS-R (300M) encoder with a pairwise consistency objective that minimizes the representation distance between an utterance's uncompressed and codec-compressed versions, disentangling codec artifacts from the real-versus-fake decision. As a result, PCL-NET reduces average EER under neural codec compression from 28.67% to 12.77%, while preserving competitive CoSG-based deepfake detection performance. We will also make the dataset publicly available on Hugging Face upon acceptance.

Mon 5 OctSound
The gist
Audio deepfake detectors, which aim to spot fake speech, usually handle traditional audio changes like adding noise or simple compressions. The authors found that new speech synthesis methods use neural codecs that create different audio artifacts. These detectors struggle when audio is compressed or resynthesized with such neural codecs, sometimes mistaking real compressed speech for fake. To fix this, the authors made a new dataset and proposed a method called PCL-NET that trains detectors to recognize speech correctly even after neural codec compression, improving detection accuracy.
Open → 2610.07216v1

Quantum kernel methods improve speech fake detection with little training data

On Evaluating Quantum Kernel Robustness for Low-Resource Cross-Corpus Audio Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Synthetic speech detection is critical for audio security, but performance can degrade when labeled data are scarce and evaluation conditions differ from training. This study examines quantum kernel methods and lightweight neural models for cross-corpus audio deepfake detection under limited training data. We compare a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), a classical support vector machine (SVM), and a multilayer perceptron (MLP), all trained on frozen wav2vec 2.0 embeddings using a strict budget of 200 training samples. To match the qubit budget of near-term quantum hardware, embeddings are reduced to four dimensions using principal component analysis, and all models use the same reduced features. Experiments on ASVspoof 2019, ASVspoof 5, the ADD 2023 Challenge, and the In-the-Wild dataset show that under severe domain shift from ASVspoof 2019 to ADD 2023, the MLP degrades to near-random performance, with an area under the curve of approximately 50% and an equal error rate of 50.0%. In contrast, the QSVM maintains meaningful discrimination, achieving an area under the curve of 76.0% and an equal error rate of 27.0%. This advantage is not consistent across transfer directions. When trained on ADD 2023, the QSVM falls below chance on two of three transfers, while the MLP performs better. These results suggest that quantum kernel methods can be competitive under severe cross-corpus shifts and strict low-resource constraints, but do not provide a consistent advantage under near-domain transfer. We interpret these findings as an empirical characterization of quantum kernel inductive bias under distribution shift, rather than evidence of quantum advantage, since the four-qubit kernel can be simulated exactly on classical hardware.

Wed 30 SeptSoundMachine Learning
The gist
Detecting fake speech can get much harder when there’s only a little example data to learn from or when the testing audio comes from a different source than the training data. The authors compared classical and quantum techniques using a tiny amount of examples and simplified features. They found that a quantum-based method kept detecting fakes fairly well when moving to very different kinds of audio, while a common neural network method failed. However, the quantum method’s advantage disappeared under other conditions, suggesting it helps mostly in harder cross-dataset scenarios, not always.
Open → 2610.00649v1

Audio codec improves deepfake detection on low bitrate recordings

Neural Audio Codec for Robust Audio Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Audio deepfake detectors are typically evaluated on uncompressed audio, although real-world audio often undergoes low-bitrate coding. In this work, we investigate how audio coding affects deepfake detection across codecs, bitrates, and detectors, finding higher errors at lower rates. A mixed-pair protocol isolates codec-induced changes in bona fide and spoof audio, revealing asymmetric, codec-dependent failures: low-rate DAC and EnCodec mainly degrade bona fide detection, whereas X-Codec shows a stronger spoof-side limitation. Motivated by these, we propose a forensic-preserving neural audio codec (FP-NAC), which fine-tunes a pretrained codec using a detector-guided objective while preserving its native hard quantization path and bitrate. On ASVspoof 2019 LA, FP-NAC reduces EER by up to 49.8~pp compared with the original DAC at 0.5~kbps while maintaining comparable reconstruction quality. Although supervised by only one detector, FP-NAC improves performance across multiple detectors, highlighting forensic transparency as a codec design objective alongside perceptual quality. Our codes are available at https://github.com/kjungwoo03/FP-NAC.

Wed 30 SeptSoundMultimedia
The gist
Audio deepfake detectors usually work on high-quality audio, but real-world clips are often compressed, which makes detecting fake sounds harder. The authors studied how different compression methods affect detection and found that low-quality codecs can cause errors. To fix this, they created a special neural audio codec that keeps important clues for detecting fakes, even after compression. This new codec greatly lowers errors without losing sound quality and works well with different fake audio detectors.
Open → 2609.39651v1

Vietnamese speech and deepfake dataset with diverse dialects and code-switching

VietPrism: A large-scale Vietnamese speech and deepfake corpus with diverse dialects and code-switching

Abstract: Vietnamese speech research is constrained by resources that isolate automatic speech recognition from speaker, dialect, code-switching, and deepfake analysis. We introduce VietPrism, an open, multi-domain corpus that brings these dimensions together at scale: 993.4 hours and 403,941 bona fide utterances from 1,262 verified speakers across 8,388 real-world videos. To our knowledge, it is the first large-scale Vietnamese corpus to jointly provide transcripts, consistent speaker identities, five dialect groups, and naturally occurring Vietnamese--English code-switching, which constitutes nearly half of the corpus by duration. We further create over 3.1K hours of spoof speech with four open-source and commercial synthesis systems. Every spoof is conditioned on a verified speaker reference and paired with a transcript- and speaker-matched bona fide utterance, enabling unique controlled evaluation with reduced lexical and identity confounds. Zero-shot evaluation of five pretrained multilingual detectors reveals striking brittleness: EER greatly varies across detector--generator pairings, while recent multilingual detector DFA-1B degrades from 16.3% to 33.6% as speaker similarity increases. Dialect-stratified results expose further model-dependent disparities. By unifying natural linguistic diversity with controlled spoof generation, VietPrism provides a challenging foundation for Vietnamese speech modeling and trustworthy audio-deepfake detection.

Thu 24 SeptComputation and LanguageSound
The gist
Vietnamese speech research often faces challenges because data usually focus only on one problem at a time, like recognizing words or detecting fake audio. The paper introduces VietPrism, a large dataset that combines many speech features including different dialects, speaker identities, and Vietnamese-English mixing in conversation. It also includes more than 3,000 hours of artificially generated speech to test how well deepfake detectors work. The authors found existing detectors struggle when faced with voices that sound similar or with different dialects, showing that more robust tools are needed.
Open → 2609.30005v1

Text to speech models get new way to prove ownership securely

TTS-Guard: Black-Box Ownership Verification of Text-to-Speech Models via Adaptive Adversarial Speaker-Pair Fingerprints

Abstract: The rapid maturation of zero-shot Text-to-Speech (TTS) models has turned high-quality voice cloning into a widely available capability, raising acute concerns over unauthorised replication, fine-tuning and resale of proprietary speech models. Yet ownership verification for TTS remains largely open: speech is a continuous waveform whose perturbations are easily destroyed by routine signal processing, and the human auditory system imposes a much tighter perceptual budget than vision. We present \textbf{TTS-Guard}, a black-box ownership verification framework for TTS models built on \emph{adversarial speaker-pair fingerprints}. TTS-Guard(i) selects key speaker pairs in a \emph{dual} embedding space for architecture-agnostic stealth;(ii) optimises a perturbation through an \emph{adaptive curriculum} of shadow models covering fine-tuning, pruning, quantisation and distillation; and (iii) aggregates black-box queries into a calibrated \emph{Verification Confidence Score}. On five mainstream TTS systems, TTS-Guard reaches an average Fingerprint Success Rate of $96.4\%$ at a False Positive Rate of $5.8\%$, while preserving intelligibility and naturalness. The fingerprint remains effective against ten audio attacks, six model modifications, and two state-of-the-art adversarial purifiers.

Sun 20 SeptSound
The gist
High-quality voice cloning technology makes it easy to copy text-to-speech (TTS) models without permission, creating problems for owners. The authors designed TTS-Guard, a method that can verify who owns a TTS model by creating special hidden voice patterns that survive common modifications. These patterns let owners prove their models are being used without consent, even if the copied voice is altered or degraded. The method works well across many existing TTS systems while keeping the voices natural and clear.
Open → 2609.23729v1

System detects fake audio snippets in multi-speaker talks quickly

Zero-Shot Temporal Localisation of Audio Deepfakes in Multi-Speaker Conversations

Abstract: Voice-cloning fraud increasingly relies on surgical injection: a genuine conversation in which only one or two sentences are replaced by synthetic speech. Utterance-level deepfake detectors emit a single real/fake label per clip and cannot report where the synthetic speech lies. We formalise this as Temporal Deepfake Localisation in Multi-Speaker Conversations (TDLMC), show that equal error rate and min-DCF are ill-posed once a file contains both classes, and propose temporal metrics for this regime. Our contribution is a training-free five-stage pipeline that wraps a frozen binary detector and adds segment-level output with no retraining, using a two-threshold hysteresis finitestate-machine decoder to turn noisy window scores into coherent intervals. On 180 constructed multi-speaker conversations from ASVspoof 5, the system attains temporal intersection-over-union 0.90, temporal detection rate 0.95, and MS-DCF 0.26 with a strong backbone, and its false-alarm rate on genuine speech is below 6%, falling under 2% on genuine real multi-speaker dialogue (AMI). Under an identical pipeline, a trained localiser improves temporal IoU by only about 0.04, bounding the cost of forgoing supervision. Evaluated across three frozen detectors under one decoder whose constants are selected on a held-out calibration split, and with a controlled analysis attributing the residual false-alarm rate to a backbone domain gap rather than to the decoder, this provides the first zero-shot baseline and a reusable benchmark for TDLMC.

Wed 9 SeptSoundMachine Learning
The gist
Voice cloning fraud is becoming more subtle by only replacing small parts of real conversations with fake speech. The authors address the challenge of finding exactly where these fake segments appear in multi-person recordings. They created a method that uses an existing detector without retraining and identifies the fake parts in conversations with high accuracy. Their approach works well across different detectors and datasets, establishing a benchmark for this problem.
Open → 2609.10051v1

Temporal coherence analysis distinguishes real and fake audio reliably

Audio Deepfake Detection Using Temporal Coherence Analysis

Abstract: The proliferation of AI-generated audio (so-called "deepfake" audio) poses significant threats to information integrity, from voice cloning fraud to synthetic music copyright disputes. We present a temporal coherence analysis framework built upon Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP) embeddings that spans speech, instrumental music, and music with vocals. By computing pairwise cosine similarities between audio segment embeddings and extracting statistical features from the resulting distributions, we train lightweight ensemble classifiers that reliably distinguish authentic from synthetic audio. Our work provides an interpretable, computationally efficient alternative to common deep learning methods while still achieving competitive performance across speech and music domains. Further, we reveal two notable empirical findings about audio deepfakes: (1) a feature-label inversion phenomenon in which 21 of 29 statistical features reverse their discriminative direction between training and in-the-wild deployment, and (2) a speech--music direction reversal in which entropy discriminates in opposite directions for speech and music deepfakes.

Tue 8 SeptCryptography and SecuritySound
The gist
Fake audio created by AI can trick people and cause problems like fraud or copyright issues. This paper presents a way to spot fake audio by looking at how parts of a sound clip relate to each other over time, using patterns learned from both speech and music. The method uses simple math tools and clever statistics to tell real and fake sounds apart. It also finds surprising behavior where some features flip their meaning when tested in the real world, and that speech and music have opposite clues for detecting fakes.
Open → 2609.09489v1

Audio attribution accuracy drops sharply after real-world codec compression

Clean Accuracy Does Not Guarantee Provenance Robustness: A Prospective Codec-Stress Evaluation of Audio Attribution

Abstract: Audio provenance attribution - which system produced a synthetic utterance - is reported at near-ceiling accuracy on clean benchmarks, yet audio reaching an analyst has usually been transcoded. We report a prospectively registered measurement of closed-set attribution after single-stage codec transport, with the analysis region fixed from fidelity metadata before any attribution model was trained. On two corpora, in-support losses reach 53.5 [43.5, 63.6] and 70.3 [63.0, 77.5] Macro-F1 points for WavLM-Base+, and 61.0 [56.8, 65.1] and 49.8 [41.6, 57.9] for W2V2-BERT 2.0, under simultaneous component-level bands. Degradation is strongly condition- and representation-dependent: within one in-support grid WavLM losses run from -0.4 to +53.5 points, and the two encoders differ beyond a prespecified +/-5-point margin at six of twelve conditions. A clean-qualified ECAPA-TDNN and a Proxy-Anchor head degrade comparably, so the effect is not confined to one representation family or a weak linear head. The registered matched-fidelity comparison was not estimable on this grid, and waveform and perceptual measures order the conditions differently: MP3 at 8 kbit/s ranks mid-grid on SI-SDR but last on PESQ-WB while causing the largest loss. For the tested tasks, corpora, representations and codec grid, a clean accuracy figure does not by itself characterise deployment robustness.

Mon 7 SeptSoundMachine Learning
The gist
Recognizing which system produced a synthetic voice sample is usually very accurate with clean audio. The authors show that once the audio is compressed or transcoded, which often happens in real use, this recognition accuracy falls drastically and unpredictably. Different compression methods and audio representations have very different effects, and a high score on clean data does not guarantee real-world reliability. Their findings suggest that testing only on clean audio does not ensure the systems will work well in practical scenarios.
Open → 2609.07981v1